At least M.J. is not a rapist.
Why do you quit your job? Because you can't take it anymore. It's not because you got old and retired. No, what Jordan did was quit in his prime on both occasions.
And yes, Jordan had an aura about him, as does Kobe. I don't doubt that. However, he is an attention whore and narcissist for going out his way to "retire" and return, then retire again, repeat, etc. When somebody keeps doing that, it means they want people to go, "NOOOO WE CAN'T LIVE WITHOUT YOU! NOOOO!" I mean, c'mon, how many times do you need to "retire" in the prime of your career?hno:
I have the book dumbass. He never says that.
Your credibility just continues to corrode. There's no bottom with you, clearly. :lolBIG:
Checking the facts, yes you are somewhat right, the quote Phil
makes about Kobe sabotaging games in high school was made to
the press and is not in the book.
I have the book. There is no doubt that Phil trashes Kobe in the book,
and shows that Kobe did sabotage the team, and basically whined like
a bitch, and drove Shaq away from the team. There is no denying that.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/01/s...-in-lakers-triangle-offense.html?pagewanted=1
Oh wow, you were there in the room ham?
hno:It's funny the whole court deposition is here, but your name
doesn't appear there at all?
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0924041kobea1.html
There are only two people in this world who know for sure if rape
occurred, Kobe and the girl.
Oh wow, you were there in the room ham?
It's funny the whole court deposition is here, but your name
doesn't appear there at all?
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0924041kobea1.html
There are only two people in this world who know for sure if rape
occurred, Kobe and the girl.
I wasn't in the room, nor were you. :lol:
Common sense clearly eludes you. :drink:
In his new book, ''More Than a Game,'' Phil Jackson writes about a player who stubbornly refused to buy into the triangle offense, a player who thought he could showcase his talents more without giving up space and shots to his teammates.
That player joked that the triangle was a ''white man's offense,'' because of its emphasis on spot-up shooting rather than one-on-one forays to the basket.
It sounds like a Kobe Bryant lament. But the words belong to Michael Jordan, who took several years to grasp all the qualities of the offense that helped the Chicago Bulls win six championships.
--------------------------------------------------
Jackson also said: ''Someone told me that in high school, Kobe used to sabotage his own games, so the game could be close, so he could dominate at the end. To sabotage the team process, to be so self-centered in your own process . . . it's almost stupefying.''
Bryant said he would not dignify the claim with a comment.
Jackson, upon reflection, said, ''There's a word, 'sabotage,' that got a large degree of colorization. . . . If I could take the word back, 'sabotage,' I would do that.''
------------------------------------------
The only thing that article shows is that everybody has flaws. Jordan and Kobe were both selfish when they initially entered the league, as most players at the NBA level. You can't succeed the way they have without at least some degree of greediness.
Same deal with Phil. Just because he's considered the greatest coach in the NBA, doesn't mean he doesn't exaggerate accounts or use fictitious or bullshit sources to project his antagonistic feelings in a passive aggressive format.
If you study the rape case you'll find documented evidence
that:
Faber's rape examination revealed "vaginal trauma" and that her underwear had a very small brown mark on the crotch that was identified as dried blood.
The prosecution deemed that there was plenty evidence to go to trial,
and the only reason it didn't is because the woman got paid off.
There is evidence leaning both ways in this case, and the only
common sense statement is the one I already stated which is that
only two people in this world know if rape actually occurred in that
hotel room.
So, for Kobe's scrotum lappers to definitively state that no rape occurred
is frankly an ignorant, stupid thing to say.
I love how you ignore my very clear statement that said
there is evidence leaning both ways in the case.
hno:Besides, what you're implying is that if a woman has sex before
getting raped, then it can't actually be rape, because there
would be multiple sperm samples in her vagina. WTF?
I'll repeat myself yet again. There are only two people in this
world that know if rape occurred, and you are not one of them.
<<Ham wins the douche of the year awardI love how you ignore my very clear statement that said
there is evidence leaning both ways in the case.
Besides, what you're implying is that if a woman has sex before
getting raped, then it can't actually be rape, because there
would be multiple sperm samples in her vagina. WTF?
I'll repeat myself yet again. There are only two people in this
world that know if rape occurred, and you are not one of them.
Do I have to spell it out for your dim wit?
hno:Who has more credibility? The slut who wants to make a quick buck, or the guy all the girls want? You're just grasping for straws now. :lol:
