I said they weren't good offensively. This is true. The 2020 Rays were 13th in the league in OPS. Basically average. But yes, the Rays are world beaters on offense because their record is good. There's no other explanation. LOL... you're in over your head in this whole discussion I'm noticing.
And just so you know, Kershaw did survive that game because the Rays are mediocre offensively. Most world series lineups don't have a giant glaring hole in the bottom of the order like that with multiple guys who are automatic outs even if you don't make your pitches, which Kershaw did not make great pitches to those guys in the 4th inning. Those at bats in the 4th inning were truly horrible and got Kershaw out of that jam before he imploded. Against a better offense, that likely doesn't happen, and we're likely here having a discussion about how Kershaw gave up 5 runs and blew the game.
actually not .
You the one over your head actually.
You are using outdated back of the baseball card stats to make your case such as ERA and W/L record .
Those stats have not been takin seriously in quite some time when it comes to analysis .
BAPIB for instance is a much better measure and HH% just to name a few .
When you use those figures his postseason failures are overblown although yes he has been much better in the regular season .
But he has not been nearly as bad as has been advertised when you get past the back of the baseball card stats that you seem to still use.
Are you seriously arguing that Kershaw's post season ERA is nearly 2 full runs over his regular season ERA over the span of 190 innings because of bad luck?
Anyway, if you want to go that retarded path, Kershaw allows 1 HR per 12.89 innings in the regular season and 1 HR every 6.53 innings in the postseason. That's a stat that can't possibly have much to do with luck, right?
Can you imagine the pressure that was on that Cubs team during game 6 in 2016? The mighty Clayton Kershaw coming to town for game 6...
Not only that, if Kershaw had won game 6, there's very little chance the Cubs recover and win game 7. I remember 2003 well.
But Kershaw did not give his team a chance to win that game in game 6, did he? He gave up runs early and was giving up loud and hard contact every inning.
What he is now and what he was then are different
I would say calling liberal athletes less clutch is a stretch. Far-left athletes might actually be different.
People on the far left tend to be unathletic little bitches or thugs. Whiny cry babies who likely don't deal well with pressure
Sorry, just kind of true
But I have no idea of any of these players are that
But it would make sense if they are
I enjoy the Bumgardner mentioned. Loved the guy in the play offs, especially the 2014 post season. Every time he came in, it was like dad coming out to pitch vs his son and his 8th grade buddies and dad was going to teach the kids a lesson.
With that said, Bumgardner is now an actual Bum pitcher. While Kershaw is still a stud. So...do i really need to make some sort of political statement now to wrap this up? Nah.
With that said, Bumgardner is now an actual Bum pitcher. While Kershaw is still a stud. So...do i really need to make some sort of political statement now to wrap this up? Nah.
So it is your contention that no famous person or public figure has ever made a donation that they don't care about, or don't believe in personally?
That is literally an argument you're making right now, just so we are clear?
I can't tell which of you and crudebar is dumber. Probably crudebar, that dumb bitch rode the short bus to school before he dropped out.
