It would be a younger version of him. I would think the pork rind neck matches but just a younger pic.
I have it on my bucket list to head on down to the courthouse for one of his civil cases he’ll no doubt lose. I just want the chance to look at him and shake my head in disgust. I just have to see for myself these mental cases exist, filing frivolous lawsuits, suffering TDS, and just being an extreme libtard. But mostly looking at him in disgust would make my day.
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, I can just SEE you in your lonely room, strokin' your 'lil Jimmy to a FRENZY (hey, at least she's a lot better looking than Succubus Sidney) in anticipation of the big "trial." How come you Republi-KUNTS cry "Voter fraud!" virtually EVERY time you get BUTT fucked in an election, invariably, without a SHRED of proof (think: Looney Rudy ad Succubus Sidney's SLIGHT lack of success in 65 consecutive such lawsuits? You'd be well advised to pay more attention to the BUTT fucking that's coming in a few days when the taxes of your Fat, fatuous fukwad of a Fuhrer are released, you gullible, brain dead, always wrong cocksucker.NEWS
Judge Orders 2-Day Trial In Kari Lake Election Lawsuit
By
Truth Press
Published
8 hours ago
Arizona Republican gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake’s lawsuit against Maricopa County will go to trial, a judge ruled late Monday.
Lake filed the lawsuit December 9, alleging that “hundreds of thousands of illegal ballots infected” the Nov. 8 election and led to Hobbs being declared the winner, and “contains more than 270 exhibits of evidence.” Lake’s suit also relies on expert witness testimony.
Last week Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson agreed to allow Lake’s legal team to “inspect a small number of printed and early ballots from the election, including 50 that were marked ‘spoiled’ on Election Day.” That inspection has not occurred yet; it is scheduled to begin Tuesday, December 20.
Then, after a hearing Monday:
…Thompson tossed eight of the claims in Lake’s lawsuit, but allowed two to remain that alleged an intentional plot by officials to manipulate the election in favor of Lake’s Democratic opponent, Secretary of State Katie Hobbs. In two separate orders, he ruled that a two-day trial will take place before Jan. 2, and that Hobbs and County Recorder Stephen Richer would be required to testify as Lake wished.
The ruling stated that Lake has “alleged intentional misconduct sufficient to affect the outcome of the election and thus has stated an issue of fact that requires going beyond the pleadings,” and that at trial Lake must show that the county’s printer malfunctions were intentional and designed to affect the election results, and that the actions “did actually affect the outcome.”
While Hobbs’ attorneys argued that “Lake’s case should be thrown out because it doesn’t adhere to state standards for a valid election complaint” and asked for sanctions against Lake and her attorneys:
Kurt Olsen, one of Lake’s attorneys, meanwhile portrayed the lawsuit as an expose of systemic problems, failures and possible illegal acts by election officials that led to “massive failure” at the polling stations and “tens of thousands” of disenfranchised voters.
Lake’s attorneys for the suit include Bryan Blehm, who was a lawyer for Cyber Ninjas, the contractor hired by the state Senate for its review of the 2020 election, and Olsen, a Washington, D.C., lawyer who recently was ordered to pay sanctions in a federal suit brought by Lake and Finchem that a judge said contained frivolous and baseless claims.
Olsen, who spoke after the county lawyers, said the judge should put stock in the affidavit of “top cyber expert” Clay Parikh, whose analysis concluded that the county’s “system-wide” failures could only be explained by intentional manipulation of county officials. An analysis “based on science” also showed that 15,000 to 29,000 votes were disenfranchised, Olsen said. He also claimed the county mysteriously “found” 25,000 “extra voters” two days after the polls closed.
Lake will update the crowd at Turning Point USA’s AMFEST in Phoenix Tuesday, she announced.
STFU, you welching, delusional douchebag: you probably welched "in person" and got the shit bet outta you, hence the little 3 month "vacation," or, oh, excuse me, the "cleaning up" of your apartment after it was "robbed" on my orders.
Whatt fuckin' lying, losing scumbag. Get ready for the taxes, Scumbag, they're gonna look up his fat ass, insert a beach umbrella, then open, lol.
Democratic lawmakers vote to release former President Trump’s tax returns
Ben Werschkul
·Washington Correspondent
Tue, December 20, 2022 at 5:04 PM PST
Democrats on the House Ways and Means committee voted Tuesday to release former President Donald Trump’s tax returns in a move that opponents say will have “severe consequences.”
The vote was 24-16 on a party-line basis.
The six years of returns — spanning from 2015-2020 — will be released to the public in the coming days after the documents are prepared by staffers to redact information like Social Security numbers, street addresses, and other identifying data.
The returns will be released as part of a larger committee report on the IRS practice of auditing presidents and marks the end of a long partisan battle that began when then-candidate Trump broke years of tradition by refusing to release his tax returns during the 2016 presidential campaign.
"After a long process, this was not about being punitive, this was not about being malicious," Committee chairman Richard Neal (D-MA) said Tuesday after the vote.
Former President Donald Trump during an event at his Mar-a-Lago estate in November to announce that he will once again run in 2024. (REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst)
The committee had a range of options on the table from keeping the returns private for now or releasing a summary to releasing all or part of the returns themselves and opting to send the documents to the full House of Representatives, which has the effect of making them public.
The move drew intense condemnation from Republicans on the committee and across Washington.
"Democrats are unleashing a dangerous new political weapon that is going to have severe consequences," GOP ranking member Kevin Brady (R-TX) said Tuesday.
Republicans will take control of the powerful tax-writing committee in just a few weeks and wouldn’t say if today’s move will lead to reprisals.
"I won't speculate on what the next Congress and this committee will focus on related to tax returns,” Brady said. "But I do know a big focus will be on the IRS."
Before the hearing, House Ways and Means Committee Ranking Member Rep. Kevin Brady (R-TX) addressed reporters next to a sign decrying the idea of releasing Trump's tax returns. (REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein)
Brady is retiring this year and Rep. Vern Buchanan (R-FL) is one of the candidates to replace him atop the committee next year. Buchanan has called the move “an extremely slippery slope and would make clear no American is safe from being targeted for their personal or political beliefs.”
Still, there was very little that Republicans could do Tuesday with Democrats in control of the panel and voting in unison.
Six years of returns
With the documents themselves still awaiting preparation, it remains to be seen what new details might be uncovered that aren’t already publicly known. In 2020, the New York Times obtained a trove of Trump’s tax return data going back decades. But they didn't include returns from certain years that are now in the possession of House Democrats, such as 2018 or 2019 while Trump was in office.Those leaked returns showed that Trump paid just $750 in federal income taxes in 2016 when he won the presidency and another $750 the year after. He also paid no federal income taxes in 11 of the 18 years that The Times examined.
Prosecutors in New York have also obtained access to some of Trump’s tax data, but have not released them publicly.
House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Rep. Richard Neal (D-MA) speaks with Ranking Member Rep. Kevin Brady (R-TX) during the meeting to discuss former President Donald Trump's tax returns. (REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein)
Tuesday’s hearing, while historic, was also a quick affair at least when it came to the cameras. Chairman Neal opened the review of the confidential materials and moved quickly into a private session after agreeing to a motion from Brady that a transcript of the private meeting would be made public.
Then, more than four hours later, the cameras were turned back on, reporters were let back into the room, and the voting promptly got underway.
Tuesday's events provided a bookend of sorts for Neal, who is handing over his gavel at the end of the year. In 2019, Democrats took control of the panel and Neal headed the committee, beginning his effort for the returns and arguing that the committee needed them as part of a larger look at an Internal Revenue Service program of auditing sitting presidents.
Speaking to reporters after the vote, Rep. Brady again criticized the action saying, "what was clear today is that public disclosure of President Trump's private tax returns has nothing to do to do with the stated purpose of reviewing the IRS presidential audit process."
Republicans have long disputed that the returns were being pursued for a legitimate legislative purpose, charging that the real reason was simply to make them public as a means to embarrass the former president.
Dabitch. ?????????
Dafinch's Welch List!
Citi-bank
Capitol One
American Express Carrington Mortgage Services
BANK OF AMERICA OCWEN LOAN SERVICING,
LLC Pro Tax and Accounting
Meadows at England Run HOA
Enhanced Recovery Company
Wells Fargo Bank Guaranteed Rate
ALG
Trustee City of Henderson Republic
Services City of Las Vegas Water
ReconTrust Company
Plus Four, Inc.
BAC Home Loan Servicing
LP First
Premier Bank (Secured Credit Card he defaulted on LMAO)
Convergent Outsourcing Miami National Enterprises Cox Communications AT&T Sprint You guys ever see someone with a below 500 credit score?
Dafinch's Welch List!
Citi-bank
Capitol One
American Express Carrington Mortgage Services
BANK OF AMERICA OCWEN LOAN SERVICING,
LLC Pro Tax and Accounting
Meadows at England Run HOA
Enhanced Recovery Company
Wells Fargo Bank Guaranteed Rate
ALG
Trustee City of Henderson Republic
Services City of Las Vegas Water
ReconTrust Company
Plus Four, Inc.
BAC Home Loan Servicing
LP First
Premier Bank (Secured Credit Card he defaulted on LMAO)
Convergent Outsourcing Miami National Enterprises Cox Communications AT&T Sprint You guys ever see someone with a below 500 credit score?
Now that the judge tossed most of Lake's lawsuit, it has pretty much zero bite left.
The two he left are one very difficult to prove issue and one who really cares issue.
The tossed issues were the meat.
Not sure what Lake is now or if she is just a show to be frank.
She is sure looking like controlled opposition in Kabuki theater.
Nothing is really going to come of this lawsuit now
The corrupt judge and possibly corrupt legal team of Lake are seeing to it.
Can't wait to see how Lake spins this, as it really makes her look like a complete fool
and total sell out RINO
The two he left are one very difficult to prove issue and one who really cares issue.
The tossed issues were the meat.
Not sure what Lake is now or if she is just a show to be frank.
She is sure looking like controlled opposition in Kabuki theater.
Nothing is really going to come of this lawsuit now
The corrupt judge and possibly corrupt legal team of Lake are seeing to it.
Can't wait to see how Lake spins this, as it really makes her look like a complete fool
and total sell out RINO
Kari Lake trial insane explosive bombshells…
- Kari Lake trial reveals 42.5% of ballots in their random samples were illegal ballots. Things are about to get crazy…
- 48 of 113 ballots reviewed during our examination were 19-inch ballots produced on 20-inch paper. This one-inch discrepancy cause chaos on Election day. Causing the mass rejection of these votes as they were attempted to be read through the tabulators.
- 25+ Year Cyber Security Expert and Certified Forensic Investigator testifies under oath that based on Maricopa Election officials admitting they used wrong sizes for Ballots on Election Day that it was the cause of vote center tabulator rejection
- AZ Co Elections Director - Scott Jarrett completely evades answering whether or not the 2022 AZ Midterm elections had obvious and documented disruptions He argues voters still had other options
- "Cowardly Katie Hobbs is trying desperately to get out of testifying in our trial. She's already a twice-convicted racist. She clearly doesn't want to add perjury to that list." - Kari Lake
Insane!
Nah, they got PLENTY of courage, it's just that YOU have no brains, you stupid, Nazi turd. Oh, look, HERE'S a shocker (Sanctions, INCOMING!):
https://news.yahoo.com/
Kari Lake’s lawsuit challenging Arizona election loss tossed out by judge
3
Graig Graziosi
Sat, December 24, 2022 at 12:19 PM PST·3 min read
The lawsuit by defeated Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake challenging the results of her election have been tossed out by a judge.
The former news anchor-turned-MAGA politician lost her election in November to Democrat Katie Hobbs, 50.3 per cent to 49.7 per cent.
After a two day trial, Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson tossed out Ms Lake’s lawsuit alleging that election officials in the county had knowingly sabotaged her candidacy through the use of printer malfunctions on Election Day.
Mr Thompson ruled that Ms Lake’s witnesses did not have any personal knowledge of intentional misconduct, and that her claims lacked clear and compelling evidence of wide spread misconduct.
"The Court cannot accept speculation or conjecture in place of clear and convincing evidence," Mr Thompson said, according to the Associated Press.
Election fraud was a hallmark of Ms Lake’s campaign. She first focused on former President Donald Trump’s loss to Joe Biden in 2020, and then after losing in November shifting focus to her own allegedly rigged election.
Ms Lake reportedly asked the judge to either declare her the winner of the election or to order a revote in Maricopa County. He found no evidence to warrant adherence to her ultimatum.
He told Ms Lake that unilaterally overturning the results of an election "has never been done in the history of the United States."
Ms Lake’s lawyers argued in their filing that problems with printers at some of the voting locations in Maricopa County —where more than 60 per cent of the state’s voters reside — not only prevented voters from voting, but that the malfunction was an intentional act by nefarious actors trying to sabotage the Republican.
It is true that there were printing machine issues in Maricopa County on election day, and it is also true that it resulted in long lines for voters. However, every voter was ultimately able to cast their ballot, even if they were at a polling place where the printers weren’t working.
At the time, county elections officials said that while votes could be cast, they might not be counted until later in the day, as the votes had to be delivered to a site with operational counters.
That claim served as another sticking point for Ms Lake; her lawsuit claimed the ballots’ chain of custody was broken at some point between their original facility and final counting facility. The attorneys claimed that the election workers removed votes for Ms Lake and replaced them with mail-in ballots they filled out themselves.
The judge found that there was insufficient evidence to support any of Ms Lake’ claims.
Ms Lake claimed on Saturday that she planned to appeal the judge’s ruling.
"My Election Case provided the world with evidence that proves our elections are run outside the law," she wrote. "This judge did not rule in our favour. However, for the sake of restoring faith and honesty in our elections, I will appeal his ruling."
