He's been saying this for years ... as far back as 2010
in 2013 the wording was slightly different as he was talking about His winning % in the LVH Contest
https://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/service-plays/2541632-steve-fezzik.html
What about what he is saying don't you understand though?
He isn't saying it is IMPOSSIBLE, he is saying he wants to bet anyone who thinks they're a fav to go over 58% (or w/e the # is)
At 58%, I tend to agree w/ him just becaue 80/256 games is a ton to consistently find 60% value on. The selection is too small and I don't think there is quite that much value avail on 1/3rd of the games a week.
Put it this way, if someone was a fav to do it, that's a bad motherfucker IMO.
I'm not saying they would be a favorite to do it.
I still stand on that this was back in 2013 or earlier ... 153 entries went over 58% last year alone
75 the year before, 130 the year before that, 113 in 2014, and about 50 in 2013
I do understand what you are saying. It's like he walks into a sportsbook and says to the first guys he see's, I bet you, you can't hit 58% in the Contest
That person isn't going to be the favorite to hit 58%
I'm saying he was called out on this bet, and he didn't take the call, or something along those lines.
what relevance ??
if one of the 500+ had taken him on the wager, he would have lost
I'm sure that Steve knows or knew people in the contest that hit over 58%
You're the one that said he's not saying it's Impossible ... Not sure what your problem is now.. Yes the Avg person wouldn't win the wager, But it is POSSIBLE
that if he made that wager, he could Also Lose
and I'll say it again, we have No idea what he really meant , because if you go back to his 2013 comment, he's saying Nobody in the Supercontest over a 6 year period can beat his overall winning %
Totally different from what BB posted. which we still don't know the Full Bet, because we don't know which video he's taking about.
Totally different from what BB posted. which we still don't know the Full Bet, because we don't know which video he's taking about.
You said "I'm guessing he's not talking about the Contest itself, because the last 5 years the winner has hit Way over that"
That's why I asked why you think the winner hitting way over that the last 5 years has relevance. Because ya know....you said it.
Do you think it has relevance that people have hit over 58% the last 5 years? Of course he could lose, he thinks he's >50% vs anyone.
Not sure why you think I have a problem because I'm asking you a question based on something you said.
That's why I asked why you think the winner hitting way over that the last 5 years has relevance. Because ya know....you said it.
Do you think it has relevance that people have hit over 58% the last 5 years? Of course he could lose, he thinks he's >50% vs anyone.
Not sure why you think I have a problem because I'm asking you a question based on something you said.
