Since your post shows a fundamental lack of understanding of
statistics, and probably basic logic, I will repost my stat from earlier
in this thread. Please reread until you get the concept into your head.
If you have trouble after rereading, just let me know, and I will guide
you through the basic junior-high mathematics concepts.
Here, I'll tell you what, I'll highlight the important part of the stats,
so you don't have to think too hard.
Enjoy.
Male Homosexuals Commit A Disproportionate Number of Child Sex Abuse Cases
Homosexual apologists admit that some homosexuals sexually molest children, but they deny that homosexuals are more likely to commit such offenses. After all, they argue, the majority of child molestation cases are heterosexual in nature. While this is correct in terms of absolute numbers, this argument ignores the fact that homosexuals comprise only a very small percentage of the population.
The evidence indicates that homosexual men molest boys at rates grossly disproportionate to the rates at which heterosexual men molest girls. To demonstrate this it is necessary to connect several statistics related to the problem of child sex abuse: 1) men are almost always the perpetrator; 2) up to one-third or more of child sex abuse cases are committed against boys; 3) less than three percent of the population are homosexuals. Thus, a tiny percentage of the population (homosexual men), commit one-third or more of the cases of child sexual molestation.
Oops...almost forgot
Yep, I know you were about to remind me
The Ice Cream Man
I'm here to tell you that YES, there's a possible chance the ICM might have The Gay.
But only in rare instances to do they actually make a move, as opposed to say - the sports coach, the Christian counselor or the atheist never married music teacher.
Most ICM can achieve satisfaction just by giving the kid(s) a popsicle and watching them eat it.
FINALLY, make sure and tell your kids to watch out for This Guy
<table width="400" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td height="273" valign="top"><embed src="http://www.tubearoo.com/player/spiked_player.swf?file=http://www.tubearoo.com/videocodes/81859/data.xml&auto_play=false" quality="high" scale="noscale" bgcolor="#000000" width="100%" height="100%" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="sameDomain" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" /></td></tr></table>
Yep, I know you were about to remind me
The Ice Cream Man
I'm here to tell you that YES, there's a possible chance the ICM might have The Gay.
But only in rare instances to do they actually make a move, as opposed to say - the sports coach, the Christian counselor or the atheist never married music teacher.
Most ICM can achieve satisfaction just by giving the kid(s) a popsicle and watching them eat it.
FINALLY, make sure and tell your kids to watch out for This Guy
<table width="400" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td height="273" valign="top"><embed src="http://www.tubearoo.com/player/spiked_player.swf?file=http://www.tubearoo.com/videocodes/81859/data.xml&auto_play=false" quality="high" scale="noscale" bgcolor="#000000" width="100%" height="100%" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="sameDomain" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" /></td></tr></table>
It's Copied from an Opinion site and authored by a PhD, which for many is all they need.
http://www.traditionalvalues.org/urban/one-a.php
Two big problems in one short post.
1) making an irrational position even more irrational. In Mac's world, being opposed to gay marriage not only makes you a homophobes, it makes you a racist too. Next week, being against gay marriage will mean you support stuff like Nazi concentration camps and the killing fields of Cambodia.
2) Did you know that the best way to avoid shark attacks is to swim as far away from the shore as possible? That's right (using Mac's logic), because most shark attacks occur a few feet from the shore.
Furthermore, if you want to avoid automobile accidents, just don't drive within one mile of your house too often. You see, most accidents occur within one mile of your home.
Can you please stay on point and not keep acting like a moving target?
JTP did not say he was against gay marriage; he said he will not allow gays to be around his children. There is a big difference that you are glossing over.
JTP and today's conservatives: preaching fear and intolerance just like yesterday's conservatives.
And none of the righties in this thread have condemned JTP comments yet.
OK, I'll concede the point about about JTP's comments, all the talk around here recently has been about gay marriage and homophobes, so I went down that path.
However, you are totally wrong about the right to vote. The Republicans approved the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by a wider margin than the Democrats did.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vote totals
Totals are in "Yea-Nay" format:
- The original House version: 290-130 (69%-31%)
- The Senate version: 73-27 (73%-27%)
- The Senate version, as voted on by the House: 289-126 (70%-30%)
[edit] By party
The original House version:<sup id="cite_ref-King_8-0" class="reference">[9]</sup>
- Democratic Party: 152-96 (61%-39%)
- Republican Party: 138-34 (80%-20%)
- Democratic Party: 46-21 (69%-31%)
- Republican Party: 27-6 (82%-18%)
- Democratic Party: 153-91 (63%-37%)
- Republican Party: 136-35 (80%-20%)
This is simply another example of how the Democratic Party and their enablers in the media rewrite history. Since LBJ was President, the Democrats get credit and somehow the party that was more supportive of the legislation is now being viewed as being the opposition to the bill. LBJ's only real opposition came from within his own party, and he had to talk many of them into supporting the bill.
ROFL. Typical expected leftist response, don't address the issues or facts,
just throw in either:
1. racist slur
2. KKk slur
3. Nazi slur
Oh yeah, throw in a couple ad hominem attacks while you're at it, really
buttresses your argument right?
God I wish public schools would teach basic junior high logical
thinking and argumentation skills.
hno:
ROFL. Typical expected leftist response, don't address the issues or facts,
just throw in either:
1. racist slur
2. KKk slur
3. Nazi slur
Oh yeah, throw in a couple ad hominem attacks while you're at it, really
buttresses your argument right?
God I wish public schools would teach basic junior high logical
thinking and argumentation skills.
Why didn't you link your source?
These are the same people that supported FDR's New Deal and LBJ's Great Society, so I don't think they're conservatives.
It also doesn't change the fact that 80% of the Republicans in office supported the bill.
Can you provide a link that shows how many of those "Dixiecrats" switched parties? because I think it more hyperbole and simply part of their justification for rewriting history.
Sometimes I do, all you had to do was ask, looks like barman
obliged you.
Why didn't you cite your source linking traditionalvalues.org to the KKK?
Here is a quote from Traditional Values.Org:
"Contrary to what homosexual activist groups or homosexual-affirming psychological associations may suggest, there is hope for individuals who wish to break free from unwanted same-sex attractions, sexual compulsions, cross-dressing, or transsexual feelings.
The list below is not comprehensive yet many of these organizations provide their own lists of referral services state by state as well as international resources. We will continue to add to this list.
The good news is that no one is born homosexual or transsexual. These are mental conditions that can be treated through religious-based or psychological therapies.
We offer this list to all those who feel trapped in unwanted same-sex desires. We pray that they will find the freedom they deserve to live full and productive lives."
So you, F'ing Zit, trust the statistics on a website promoting "homosexual cures" as to who commits sex crimes?
Do you, F'ing Zit, believe homosexuality can be cured?
I think you didn't link it because you were too embarrassed to link it.
Embarrassed? Why not at all, I know many ex-homosexuals that have
been cured.
Thanks for asking.
Since you clearly have been brain-washed by the gay activists. I'll
point you to some great reading material.
http://www.conservapedia.com/Homosexuality
All the stats you need to show that:
1. Strong evidence that homosexuality is a choice
2. Homosexuality can be cured
3. Failed Experiments to show genetic determinism for homosexuality
Don't let the facts get in the way of your hatred of the truth.
F'ing heterophobe.
Dumb, LOL yes you are
trying to rewrite history by saying conservatives were really liberals and liberals were really conservatives because that serves your attempt to rewrite history better.
after all, Goldwater & Nixon must be modern day liberals while JFK & LBJ would be modern day conservatives. LMAF
But if they pass stuff you liked, well they are what they are.
Keep your sorry ass attempt to rewrite history to the sorry ass people that can't see the forest through the trees.
And think for one second. You're making an argument that Dixiecrats switched parties because the Democrats approved the Equal Rights Act, without providing one source to back up your position other than some attempt to cite an ever changing political landscape while ignoring one big fucking glaring weakness;
why on earth would Dixiecrats switch to the party which supported the ERA by an 80/20 ratio? doesn't that defeat their purpose and your entire argument?
Of course it does, but lefties repeat their own lies and their own version of rewriting history so often that their lies become the truth to them.
