Is Bradford a Lock to Win the Heisman?

[HPark1]

Let me follow your logic. You are basing your opinion on what 5 voters say out of more than 900 voters ? very logical to me ! :lol:
What does my Florida futures wagers have to do with the Heisman race .... Nothing whatsoever except that in order to come up with that conclusion one has to use logic. I've been winning big money on futures for over 30 years now and one must look at the schedule etc to come up with wagers that have a strong percentage chance to win. Heisman wagering is nothing but a wager on the future. Would I bet on it at - 600 ? no way because Bradford was the correct side quite a while ago IMHO !

Those are a sample of voters who are not voting Bradford number 1. That evidence is a lot more useful than your sole opinion (in which you do not even have a vote yourself) Bradford is a lock. I am simply contesting your belief this race is a "lock". Thus far you've supplied absolutely nothing to back up your opinion this will be a lopsided vote. How you mock my efforts to back up my opinion is ludicrous.

Again I don't know what you winning big on futures for over 30 years has anything to do with sizing up the Heisman race and determining whether or not it will be a one sided vote.

And its even stranger now you suggest -600 is not worth a bet even though you've stated his victory is a virtual lock twice in this thread.

It's a Lock ! not even close !

Bradford in a walk ! If I use the word lock... It's a lock my friend !

If I was using exclamation posts and screaming lock I'd be confident enough to recommend a -600 line. So I guess you do agree this isn't going to be a cakewalk after all.

It appears all this discussion has been for nothing.

 

[kermit16]

Those are a sample of voters who are not voting Bradford number 1. That evidence is a lot more useful than your sole opinion (in which you do not even have a vote yourself) Bradford is a lock. I am simply contesting your belief this race is a "lock". Thus far you've supplied absolutely nothing to back up your opinion this will be a lopsided vote. How you mock my efforts to back up my opinion is ludicrous.

Again I don't know what you winning big on futures for over 30 years has anything to do with sizing up the Heisman race and determining whether or not it will be a one sided vote.

And its even stranger now you suggest -600 is not worth a bet even though you've stated his victory is a virtual lock twice in this thread.




If I was using exclamation posts and screaming lock I'd be confident enough to recommend a -600 line. So I guess you do agree this isn't going to be a cakewalk after all.

It appears all this discussion has been for nothing.

Once again you miss all my points ! Why would anyone want to bet Bradford at - 600 when that's the poorest odds I have ever seen on Bradford to win the Heisman. I guess you would want me to recommend wagering on the Giants to win the Super Bowl now at 2/1 when I have the Giants at 30/1 ? Timing my friend , Timing !

 

[HPark1]

Once again you miss all my points ! Why would anyone want to bet Bradford at - 600 when that's the poorest odds I have ever seen on Bradford to win the Heisman. I guess you would want me to recommend wagering on the Giants to win the Super Bowl now at 2/1 when I have the Giants at 30/1 ? Timing my friend , Timing !

You are going to send me to the madhouse. My whole discussion with you is concerning whether or not this Heisman vote is going to be one-sided for Bradford. You posted twice this is a big lock for Bradford while I disagreed and believed this will be a close race. There is nothing else to this debate. I do not care about your previous wagers on this heisman race or any other sport. It is not relevant.

I've offered an opinion with some evidence to counter your opinion (to which point is baseless).

Nobody cares if you bet Bradford in week 1 or yesterday. Of course you have a ton more value if you bet previously but that makes no difference now. If you state something is a lock how can you not recommend that play at -600. I'd think that is a reasonable line for a lock.

What was the point of your "this is a total lock" posts?

 

[Waz]

What's the latest on the Heisman watch?

 

[kermit16]

You are going to send me to the madhouse. My whole discussion with you is concerning whether or not this Heisman vote is going to be one-sided for Bradford. You posted twice this is a big lock for Bradford while I disagreed and believed this will be a close race. There is nothing else to this debate. I do not care about your previous wagers on this heisman race or any other sport. It is not relevant.

I've offered an opinion with some evidence to counter your opinion (to which point is baseless).

Nobody cares if you bet Bradford in week 1 or yesterday. Of course you have a ton more value if you bet previously but that makes no difference now. If you state something is a lock how can you not recommend that play at -600. I'd think that is a reasonable line for a lock.

What was the point of your "this is a total lock" posts?

Some of us veterans don't make a living wagering on - 600 bets ! It sounds like you don't really care about timing and logic so you are correct .... You've wasted your time even reading anything I have to say. GL on your wagers

 

[BCTTWR]

What's the latest on the Heisman watch?

Bradford still the favorite. I would not lay -400 though.

 

[HPark1]

Some of us veterans don't make a living wagering on - 600 bets ! It sounds like you don't really care about timing and logic so you are correct .... You've wasted your time even reading anything I have to say. GL on your wagers

Why do you continue to venture off topic and not make sense? Its like you don't read my posts and just type whatever you want to. Its insane.

Bottom line is you stated Bradford was a lock loudly. Now I disagreed and said it would be a close race and backed it up with some information. You thus far have done nothing to back your opinion of a lopsided vote and keep muttering on about future wagers with the Gators and other nonsense which serves no purpose to this discussion.

Again I ask, what was the point of you posting;

It's a Lock ! not even close !

Bradford in a walk ! If I use the word lock... It's a lock my friend !

And why can't you back up your opinion with any data? All I hear is the constant chime of logic, which is ridiculous. Everyone has their own. That is not a manner in which you can back up a opinion.



*For the sane people out there as I thought the race is very close. Tebow actually may get more first place votes than Bradford (beyond Kermit's logic I know) but Bradford appears to be getting more 1 and 2's combined. McCoy still right there. Bradford edging it at the moment.