From a conventional attack certainly. But remember Israel can survive countless wars and never win one. But lose just once and it's population would be massacred. And Israel cannot survive a first strike nuclear attack.
Iran is a maniacal and genocidal regime, hated by its own people. They kill their own on a daily basis, and export murder and terror throughout the globe. Obama is war weary. Kerry is naive. Hagel is retarded. It's a dangerous combo. The way the clerics in Iran treat their own people, call for death to both Israel and America on a daily basis, why would anyone trust them? If the regime was faced with being overthrown why would it hesitate to use a nuke, or sell it to a Shia terrorist group in order to have plausible deniability? If the Saudis are scared enough to align with hated Israel over the prospect of a nuclear armed Iran that should be enough to open Obama's eyes.
That's right. So what are the facts?
And what is with hijacking every thread with your distracting BS? If you want to do it within your thread (with next to zero reads and replies) that's one thing, but to continuously invade other people's threads with this garbage is highly disrespectful and rude! :>(
Obama had his golden opportunity to end the Ayatollah's reign during the recent uprising in Iran, but like the good little Islamic sympathizer he is, instead chose to keep supporting the bad guys, just like he continues to shovel millions of taxpayer dollars to Hamas terrorists fighting Israel.
For anyone paying attention to his words AND deeds, it is VERY obvious where his loyalties lie.
First of all Hi Joe......
It doesn't appear to me that Joe C had any intention of hiding the fact that he is Joe C when he took his new name. I have not followed the argument and the ghost accusations closely though. But it seems Joe wanted people to know who he was or he would have signed up as Sherrif "Somebody Else." I was Scott Landau here until Shrink reformatted the board. Forgot my original PW and could not recover it. Re-registered as ScottL. Could be a similar story for Joe. Shouldn't matter anyway. I asked Dennis Green. He said, "He is who you thought he was."
It doesn't appear to me that Joe C had any intention of hiding the fact that he is Joe C when he took his new name. I have not followed the argument and the ghost accusations closely though. But it seems Joe wanted people to know who he was or he would have signed up as Sherrif "Somebody Else." I was Scott Landau here until Shrink reformatted the board. Forgot my original PW and could not recover it. Re-registered as ScottL. Could be a similar story for Joe. Shouldn't matter anyway. I asked Dennis Green. He said, "He is who you thought he was."
hope you're right. Kinda doubt it as the Jewish community to a man is up and arms with this agreement. USA has chosen its path, crystal clear. GL Israel......oil projected to drop as low as $85/barrel. From $108 to $98 within a blink, ...
Not quite true. This Jew, along with many others, both worldwide and in Israel, are all for this agreement and giving it a chance to work. Netenyahou is the Leader of Israel, but doesn't speak for all Israelis or all Jews, much like Obama doesn't speak for all Americans.
However, the rising doubts among less hostile sections of the population may be driven by the fact that Obama has not worn his religion on his sleeve. He has not adopted a church in Washington and is not seen to regularly attend church services.
"It so happens that Barack Obama follows eight years in which the previous president was very public and high-profile about his religious beliefs and practices.
Following that, Obama is far less high-profile. That may be part of the confusion," said Cooperman. "In the relative paucity of information from the White House and the president himself about religious beliefs, it may be that messages from his critics have gained more currency."
"It so happens that Barack Obama follows eight years in which the previous president was very public and high-profile about his religious beliefs and practices.
Following that, Obama is far less high-profile. That may be part of the confusion," said Cooperman. "In the relative paucity of information from the White House and the president himself about religious beliefs, it may be that messages from his critics have gained more currency."
