In Memory........

[vitterd]

and I want to emphasize that Vittard provides not a single shred of evidence to support his position anywhere or anytime

Do you even realize you're using numbers that don't even apply to the argument. You are missing the 24-29k demographic. How you can't see this is mind boggling.

Posting links that proves nothing does not make your argument.

People in poverty did not win obama the election...you simply cannot read numbers. Your post election analysis is only trumped by your pre election prediction. Go state by state and take those making under the poverty level out of the equation and you're party is still not in the white house.

 

[Willie99]

Do you even realize you're using numbers that don't even apply to the argument. You are missing the 24-29k demographic. How you can't see this is mind boggling.

Posting links that proves nothing does not make your argument.

People in poverty did not win obama the election...you simply cannot read numbers. Your post election analysis is only trumped by your pre election prediction. Go state by state and take those making under the poverty level out of the equation and you're party is still not in the white house.

still nothing

what's mind boggeling is that you actually think you've proven something simply because you managed to put together a few meaningless words into the structure of a sentence

your opinion is not evidence, while I at least showed why I think why I do, you've done nothing but say you disagree

please show us why I'm wrong, cite something, anything, just not your low information opinion

at this point, I'm pitching a no hitter if only because you can't swing the bat

bring it bitch

 

[vitterd]

still nothing

what's mind boggeling is that you actually think you've proven something simply because you managed to put together a few meaningless words into the structure of a sentence

your opinion is not evidence, while I at least showed why I think why I do, you've done nothing but say you disagree

please show us why I'm wrong, cite something, anything, just not your low information opinion

at this point, I'm pitching a no hitter if only because you can't swing the bat

bring it bitch

For someone who thinks he's smarter than everyone else....you have more trouble reading and understanding polls, election results and common sense numbers. All one has to do is look at what poverty is and you can easily determine what everyone else knows. There are simply not enough votes from people living in poverty to sway a national election. also, do you know how many people in those poor households actually vote? A huge percentage of them are not registered or not age eligible. If you were ever involved in an actual national election you might be able to understand what Im talking about. The math is simple.....even for those who do not understand pre and post election numbers. Look at those considered in poverty in 2010.....that is probably why you're unable to read the numbers...you simply don't understand who is considered living in poverty.

www.npc.umich.edu/poverty/

 

[vitterd]

www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/...obamas_victory_and_romneys_defeat_116090.html

Here is a site you often reference....no talk of the poor vote as to why obama won the election.

Have you even looked at how bad the woman vote went for romney? Hispanic vote? Asian vote? Have you even looked at those.

You're not throwing a no hitter....in fact, when it comes to elections and their results.....you arent even in the ballpark with me.

 

[akphidelt]

PS: The last quote is from the scum, I threw that in for comedic purposes only. The self anointed really smart person somehow thinks the fact that Obama would have still won my home state undermines my entire argument. Can one be more clueless?

Collectively, the left wing forum members in this thread have once again proven why they're called libtards, they just don't have "it".

Dismissed

Didn't mention anything about your current argument. Simply said you are known for being retarded, lol.

 

[vitterd]

Didn't mention anything about your current argument. Simply said you are known for being retarded, lol.

The usual batshit crazy far right nutters are beating their chest over the Cantor thing. They have no idea that their primary results don't translate to general election wins. Only in the nutty type districts that vote R no matter what D is on the ballot does this affect. They actually think a more conservative candidate will do better in a national election.....it's comical to watch how dumb people can be. Ted Cruz will lose worse than romney and mccain and they will have no idea why.

 

[akphidelt]

The usual batshit crazy far right nutters are beating their chest over the Cantor thing. They have no idea that their primary results don't translate to general election wins. Only in the nutty type districts that vote R no matter what D is on the ballot does this affect. They actually think a more conservative candidate will do better in a national election.....it's comical to watch how dumb people can be. Ted Cruz will lose worse than romney and mccain and they will have no idea why.

The funniest thing is those conservative nutters can't even win in the general election primaries because even when you take in to account all the Republicans across the nation, those candidates even scare the majority of Republicans, lol. We'll get another moderate type candidate and it will be a tight race because of that. Definitely no Ted Cruz's. He'll fail just as bad Rick Perry, lol. I'm embarrassed to even admit that I thought Rick Perry had a chance. Then once they start speaking on the national stage you realize it's like listening to Dave or Willie talking up there, lol! Just embarrassing that states and districts can be filled with such retards that find these candidates appealing.

 

[vitterd]

The funniest thing is those conservative nutters can't even win in the general election primaries because even when you take in to account all the Republicans across the nation, those candidates even scare the majority of Republicans, lol. We'll get another moderate type candidate and it will be a tight race because of that. Definitely no Ted Cruz's. He'll fail just as bad Rick Perry, lol. I'm embarrassed to even admit that I thought Rick Perry had a chance. Then once they start speaking on the national stage you realize it's like listening to Dave or Willie talking up there, lol! Just embarrassing that states and districts can be filled with such retards that find these candidates appealing.

Im amazed that the wacky people here think that repubs will get elected of the are more conservative. How out of touch can a person be from reality to think that? They must live in a bubble.

 

[Willie99]

For someone who thinks he's smarter than everyone else....you have more trouble reading and understanding polls, election results and common sense numbers. All one has to do is look at what poverty is and you can easily determine what everyone else knows. There are simply not enough votes from people living in poverty to sway a national election. also, do you know how many people in those poor households actually vote? A huge percentage of them are not registered or not age eligible. If you were ever involved in an actual national election you might be able to understand what Im talking about. The math is simple.....even for those who do not understand pre and post election numbers. Look at those considered in poverty in 2010.....that is probably why you're unable to read the numbers...you simply don't understand who is considered living in poverty.

www.npc.umich.edu/poverty/

talks about poverty levels, does not address votes at all

worthless

next

 

[Willie99]

still nothing, what a surprise

anyhow, somebody is going to have to tell me if he posts something substantive that I should address

 

[SheriffJoe]

talks about poverty levels, does not address votes at all

worthless

next

What would you expect from a poker fraud stiff who mocks Fox News yet links websites like "governmentisgood.com" face)(*^%

In other news, BFL just took a dump.

Loser!@#0

 

[vitterd]

talks about poverty levels, does not address votes at all

worthless

next

Huh???? Your entire argument has been low income poverty voters won obama the election. You can't discuss that argument without knowing what the poverty level is. You keep using this 50k barometer when poverty is considered 23k. Gonna be impossible for you to understand why obama won if you are not able to realize who is poor and who isnt.

Look more into this and maybe in 2016 you will be able to figure out the most likely outcome.

 

[vitterd]

What would you expect from a poker fraud stiff who mocks Fox News yet links websites like "governmentisgood.com" face)(*^%

In other news, BFL just took a dump.

Did that BIG NEWS on the birth certificate come out yet? Are they waiting until obama builds his pres library to shock us all?? Lmao

Joe, you have fallen even lower than you were a year ago.....hard to believe.

Did you read the study that shows fox news makes you dumber? Kinda tells the story of what you do all week.

Stick to purple flowers and your bi-curiousity

 

[ScottL]

I think it's sad that you can make several back handed insults towards me and consider them humor....however when I do it you, you take offense. If you feel you're able to bust my balls then I think you should receive ball busting a little better

I don't see how you think I even came close to insulting you.

 

[loomis41973]

The entire premise of those numbers are wrong

The entire premise of your being is wrong.

Your daddy shoulda shot the whole wad on the sheets and not just 80% of it.

 

[vitterd]

The entire premise of your being is wrong.

Your daddy shoulda shot the whole wad on the sheets and not just 80% of it.

Your stupidity and inability to underrstand simple concepts would be unmatched anywhere else but here. Thankfully for you, it doesn't really shine thru here because others are just as dumb as you.

 

[Willie99]

In libtardville, when I say "the inner-city poor", they think they get to define "the inner-city poor" as people living below the poverty line. Only in libtardville can income of 25k not be considered poor.

It speaks to their knowledge base, it speaks to their base, and to argue such while saying I'm wrong and I don't understand speaks volumes about their ignorance.

Once again proving you can't reason with ignorance.

 

[vitterd]

In libtardville, when I say "the inner-city poor", they think they get to define "the inner-city poor" as people living below the poverty line. Only in libtardville can income of 25k not be considered poor.

It speaks to their knowledge base, it speaks to their base, and to argue such while saying I'm wrong and I don't understand speaks volumes about their ignorance.

Once again proving you can't reason with ignorance.

You have no idea about inner city or poor. Your limited knowledge of each, voting blocks and understanding pre and post election numbers is comical. Know your limitations kid.

 

[GasMan]

Ummm ok. You are correct, eliminate everyone who votes dem and repubs would win. Imagine if we decide to eliminate the uneducated, toothless down south white people. How do you think conservatives would do?

You do realize that the highest rates of illiteracy in the south (at least in Mississippi) are in counties that are predominately black?

Of course you don't. What's so sad for you is that I am from the north. Lived 22 years up north. I would never move back there again in my lifetime...yet it makes me smile that people like you have the same attitude about the south that I once had. It keeps jack ass yankees like you out of our hair.

Plus our women are WAY hotter...unless of course you want to go to the bah in your cah (insert nasaly whiny northern dyke voice).


FUCK ME HADDAR

 

[GasMan]