BFL: And then he went on this infamous negative roll, and surrendered his poly posting privileges for a year.
Duchess: But instead of enjoying the gift of a year away from you far right lunatics he posts in other rooms.
BFL: And look at me, preparing to slide my hand up your skirt. And they call me a coward!
Duchess: But instead of enjoying the gift of a year away from you far right lunatics he posts in other rooms.
BFL: And look at me, preparing to slide my hand up your skirt. And they call me a coward!
Scottstein living the dream, or is that living in a dream? or maybe dreaming about something
maybe Superbeets can help you out with some pictures appropriate for the moment, any special requests?
or is it too late?
maybe Superbeets can help you out with some pictures appropriate for the moment, any special requests?
or is it too late?
Your attemptss are ridiculously inaccuarte because your claiming numbers based on less than 30k. Those making 24-29k are not considered poverty. So your entire attempt to prove your point is based on false info.
Do yourself a favor...educate yourself on who votes and check the breakdown of votes for those in poverty in swing states. Maybe next time you won't look so foolish in predicting election. What will be the excuse in 2016? Minorities again?
Linked shit plenty of time and that sends you into hiding. Rasmussen ring a bell? How about when I linked all the storms/hurricanes that you said stopped happening after katrina? I will hold you up for a couple more rounds on this one
EXACTLY. Lying Ace couldn't wait to post his Lie about the Killer Frazier Glenn Miller running as a Democrat multiple times, to try and paint the Lying portrait that his sick, nazi, Anti Semitic views were somehow shaped by the Democratic party. And of course the amen chorus in that Hellhole blindly went along with it until I exposed it as just another Ace Lie.
I think you are both right and wrong. I have no dog in this fight, but if you remove the under $25K vote, which isn’t exactly the $23K, you are removing roughly 13.5% of the total vote. Of that vote, Obama claimed an approximate edge of 64-34. It certainly appears as if Florida (29) and Ohio (18) would have flipped to Romney giving him an additional 47 electoral votes. Florida and Ohio were above the 13.5% at 14.7% and 16.1%, respectively, but were also a bit tighter on the split at 61-37 and 63-35. Obama only won Florida by 73,109 and would have lost under $25K votes of approximately 751,915 to Romney’s loss of 456,079 for a difference of -295,836. In Ohio, Obama won by 103,481 and would have lost under $25K votes of approximately 535,904 to Romney’s loss of 297,724 for a difference of -238,180.
This would leave Romney ahead 253-240 with 45 electoral votes in question in Iowa (6), Nevada (6), Pennsylvania (20) and Virginia (13). I suspect Obama would have actually held all four states to still claim the presidency, but it surely would have been very close. Iowa, Nevada and Virginia appear as Obama would have certainly held, but Pennsylvania would have been close, but likely still to Obama. The popular vote would have been nearly 50-50.
This would leave Romney ahead 253-240 with 45 electoral votes in question in Iowa (6), Nevada (6), Pennsylvania (20) and Virginia (13). I suspect Obama would have actually held all four states to still claim the presidency, but it surely would have been very close. Iowa, Nevada and Virginia appear as Obama would have certainly held, but Pennsylvania would have been close, but likely still to Obama. The popular vote would have been nearly 50-50.
I lived next to Fordham one summer
Arthur Ave is safe because it's still Italians - I remember when a basketball court was put up in a park there - the Italians tore down the hoops hours later
Now I've been near the Bronx Zoo late at night by accident and it made me think I was lost and had entered the actual zoo - it definitely aint safe there
Willie's argument: Low income / impoverished and high school drop outs support the democratic party by such a significant margin that it put Obama over the top. I point out that Romney won each and every income demographic breakdown of people who make > 50k (the working class, something Obama actually won in 2008 but workers know fail when they see fail). I post links to exit polls which can be found all over the WWW.
The Vitard argues Obama would still win without (he lists several low income demographics). Lets ignore the simple fact that it's a Romney landslide if we only include 50k + households, I focused on a much lower income demographic, the lowest for which numbers I can find. I then recalculate what the popular vote nationwide and show Romney wins the popular vote resulting from the 5.4% swing (He lost by 4, a mini landslide to people who guess a lot). I post links showing where I obtained my info, and the math is relatively simple. Vittard says I'm wrong, he argues the electoral vote doesn't change (presumably because that's what he thinks and that's all that matters, because he doesn't offer an iota of evidence)
So for Vittard to be right, the voting patterns had to be different in the swing states than they were nationwide. We know Obama won key swing states by < 4%, he won FL by 1 and OH by 3. So for Vittard to be right, the lowest income demographics in those states had to give Obama less than a 27% margin of victory and / or make up less than 20% of the turnout. And those differences would have to be significant to overcome Romney's recalculated 1.4% victory nationwide.
Now I've summed up my position in one post, and I quoted all the Vittard's responses to me in this thread (not one shred of evidence, not one citation)
He argues "I (willie99) don't get it". How fucking libtarded is that? he provides nothing, I piss down his throat, and he says "I don't get it".
PS: The last quote is from the scum, I threw that in for comedic purposes only. The self anointed really smart person somehow thinks the fact that Obama would have still won my home state undermines my entire argument. Can one be more clueless?
Collectively, the left wing forum members in this thread have once again proven why they're called libtards, they just don't have "it".
Dismissed
