i thought you would be way more against it then it appears you are. if your talking about genes though, wouldnt the mixed offspring be genetically superior to the white and black partner since they would get both dominant genes from the parents?
Saying it reflects a failure in parenting is not being heavily against it? :think2:
I'm not so stupid as to think I can force anything on them, so I'm not going to get all ballistic. That would surely be counterproductive.
Yes there would be many genetic benefits to race mixing -- remember there are no guarantees but it improves the odds -- but that needs to be weighed against the risk of losing family unity. You get a likely bonus on the genetics but get a huge risk on the environment. Remember genes plus environment makes the man (or woman).
The worst would be to create a very skilled person who will adopt liberalism as his default ideology for lack of a well-defined identity. If I know I'm going to add another liberal to the world, I'd want that person to be gay, weak, stupid or otherwise non-threatening.
Because of the dangers, the selection process would need to be strict indeed. As an example, one criterion would be no men under 30 allowed because it's impossible for a male under 30 to know what he stands for. Sometimes they never know, but under 30 they most certainly don't know. There would be many other selection criteria as well, the details of which are beyond the scope of this post. Let's just say the probability that a random non-white that my kid could hook up satisfies the criteria is less than 1%