I’m not dwelling on the past . Only reacting to posts while posting links about Mary Trump and Bob Woodward books about guess who.
Lol dope .
All that long winded diarrhea of the mouth about not understanding , then there’s this about the media .
Opinion: Trump’s not president, so why can’t journalists just quit him?
Reader debate how much attention journalists should pay to the former president, even as his grip on the Republican Party tightens.
www.latimes.com
From the article . Lol !
The attention paid to Trump during his presidency bothered some readers; now, with Trump out of office but still a political force, reporting that mentions Trump is continuing to irk readers. I doubt this is the last time we’ll be hearing complaints about this.
Suffice it to say that the fact that you referred to what I said as long winded diarrhea just just cooroborates what I have said about you before:
1) you are 100% in your way one view of Trump, namely that he never once lied while in office(and for that matter in his entire life), never made ANY any mistakes
while serving as POTUS and is an "exemplary" human being.
2) You either refuse to respond DIRECTLY because of what I said in #1 because you don't have a legitimate response and/or because you don't have the intellectual
or philosophical capacity/ability to discuss and debate what I stated.
3) Instead of answering what I stated DIRECTLY, as you have done in the past, in essence you try to sweep it under the rug and concentrate on something
entirely different, hoping that you can divert interest from my original thesis.
Therefore moving forward, I have decided that while I am going to read what you say, I am not going to respond each time if I perceive
your response as the same blinders on mentality when it comes to Trump as usual because my response would simply be repetitive and would serve no purpose.
Imo as is the case with fpp/sbd, most intelligent and OBJECTIVE people out there realize that what I have stated is true.
The only difference as I see it is that at least you read what I state and do respond to it, unlike fpp, who PRETENDS not to read what I say because he is smart
enough to know that if he does, he will look bad in the eyes of many posters.
In short, moving forward, I will be selective in responding to you, ie when I see something in your post which is patently false and/or in general something
which imo needs to be pointed out to readers regardless of what I deem your response will be.
The fact that you simply dismiss what the likes of Mary Trump, Bon Woodward, General Milley and tons of what other folks in a position to know about Trump say as lies,
is clear indication of the fact of how one-sided you are and your overall brick wall mentality when it comes to Trump.
ointer:
