^
Twitter is up over 3% today.
A large regret in my life was selling FB at $38...months after IPO (~17ish cost basis)
A larger regret was selling pre-split TSLA at $600 (after actually picking it off near its low at $195ish).
EO looking meh
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...rs-dispute-over-china-election-meddling-views
Twitter is up over 3% today.
A large regret in my life was selling FB at $38...months after IPO (~17ish cost basis)
A larger regret was selling pre-split TSLA at $600 (after actually picking it off near its low at $195ish).
EO looking meh
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...rs-dispute-over-china-election-meddling-views
...but ol dirty south is back again
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Holy crap. The emergency order passed in Georgia to allow absentee voting (see: fraud) expired 5 days before the election with no renewal. <br><br>Every part of the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Georgia?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Georgia</a> election process was illegal. <br><br>You should be very angry. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WarRoomPandemic?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WarRoomPandemic</a></p>— Robert Patrick Lewis (@RobertPLewis) <a href="https://twitter.com/RobertPLewis/status/1339239810754465793?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 16, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Holy crap. The emergency order passed in Georgia to allow absentee voting (see: fraud) expired 5 days before the election with no renewal. <br><br>Every part of the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Georgia?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Georgia</a> election process was illegal. <br><br>You should be very angry. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WarRoomPandemic?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WarRoomPandemic</a></p>— Robert Patrick Lewis (@RobertPLewis) <a href="https://twitter.com/RobertPLewis/status/1339239810754465793?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 16, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
INTELL INSIDER
Friday December 18th marks the 45th day after the election, when the DNI will declare the election NULL & VOID.
It will be based on the EO POTUS signed in 2018, stating that if the DNI determines there was foreign interference in the election, they can declare the election results nullified.
Then Governors vote in January, ONE VOTE PER STATE, with more Reps than Dems voting.
Anyone else excited about Friday?
popcorn-eatinggif
Even Radcliffs comments suggested this. Other intelligence deep state officials obviously holding back their views. Creating a division and no report by Friday.. Seems like the enemy has been running parallel for decades too countering Patriot moves... Not sure how the EO goes forward now. But I'm not capable of offering opinions on this subject.
This post came about 2 hours after the Electoral College certified.
They legally certified the fraud on Monday with the EC.
The coup attempt is officially on record now.
IS THIS "HISTORIC MOMENT" POTUS SIGNING TO ENACT THE EO?
Stay tuned.
This kind of a meeting probably happens a few times a day...Who knows what they're talking about ?
From what I have read and heard from interviews on people who know that there are factions in the intelligent community about what went on.
The communist, Democrat owned intel guys are still saying Russia, Russia, Russia, this is the older faction that has been around for years.
Other, newer guys have intel and evidence on China dong things in the election that the Russian faction want to not hear.
As I understand it Radcliff is not signing off on any report that leaves out all the information that is relevant and real.
Meaning that the China info has to be included or he is not signing off on any report. Seems there is a standoff and stalling by the older, owned intel guys of the Democrat party. The other intel guys do not all like Trump but want to do their job and give out all credible and real info. They are said to have real evidence on China from before the election and even ongoing now about China involvement.
I am seeing an issue and problem here about any report coming out this Friday unless things get solved here.
More deep state, communist pieces of shit owned by Democrats/China causing issues.
Not sure what happens if that report is held up, there is only 45 days for it to come out. Do not see what happens if it does not come out within the 45 days
The communist, Democrat owned intel guys are still saying Russia, Russia, Russia, this is the older faction that has been around for years.
Other, newer guys have intel and evidence on China dong things in the election that the Russian faction want to not hear.
As I understand it Radcliff is not signing off on any report that leaves out all the information that is relevant and real.
Meaning that the China info has to be included or he is not signing off on any report. Seems there is a standoff and stalling by the older, owned intel guys of the Democrat party. The other intel guys do not all like Trump but want to do their job and give out all credible and real info. They are said to have real evidence on China from before the election and even ongoing now about China involvement.
I am seeing an issue and problem here about any report coming out this Friday unless things get solved here.
More deep state, communist pieces of shit owned by Democrats/China causing issues.
Not sure what happens if that report is held up, there is only 45 days for it to come out. Do not see what happens if it does not come out within the 45 days
nothing going to happen with this burger. at all on friday or thereafter. deadline schmeadline. if this deal was locked down...it would have been ready to roll weeks ago. take this off your radar
and the person below being referenced was the head WH lawyer
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">From my understanding the report was shown to the White House and was rejected by the person i mentioned yesterday for not having enough solid evidence.<br><br>Lets make sure <a href="https://twitter.com/DNI_Ratcliffe?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@DNI_Ratcliffe</a> knows about all the evidence we have so he can strengthen the report for his final presentation.</p>— Ron (@CodeMonkeyZ) <a href="https://twitter.com/CodeMonkeyZ/status/1339360542658424832?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 17, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
and the person below being referenced was the head WH lawyer
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">From my understanding the report was shown to the White House and was rejected by the person i mentioned yesterday for not having enough solid evidence.<br><br>Lets make sure <a href="https://twitter.com/DNI_Ratcliffe?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@DNI_Ratcliffe</a> knows about all the evidence we have so he can strengthen the report for his final presentation.</p>— Ron (@CodeMonkeyZ) <a href="https://twitter.com/CodeMonkeyZ/status/1339360542658424832?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 17, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
