You just did it again, namely begged the question poisoned the well and changed the focus of emphasis,
but NOT responding to what I just posted DIRECTLY!!
Until a little bit later I am going to say something to any objective readers of this thread to ponder(assuming that there are any besides
those of us who post here daily(a very questionable assumption for sure lol).
The premise is that you have read all of the posts here on both sides for a while, and have ambivalent feelings.
The question I ask of you is whether it is of any importance to you at all in deciding who has more credibility
based on this criterion:
One side has claimed/predicted hundreds of times on a daily basis since the 2020 Election that Trump is going
to be reinstated/devolutioned and that it is "IMMINENT", but never admits their prediction was wrong and simply
moves the goalposts out for this to happen.
The other side has maintained that reinstatemenr/devolution has not occurred and never will and uses empirical
evidence that this event as predicted has not even remotely even come close to occurring.
In short, do you folks reading this believe that an example like this has any relevance at all or no relevance at
all regarding their overall view of reality in not only this instances but in others?
I will leave it at that until using approrptriate terminology "my return," which really is imminent by the definition
of the word and which will occur within hours.