CNN anchor Chris Cuomo had a bigger role than previously known in helping defend his brother, former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, from sexual harassment allegations that forced him out of office, newly released transcripts and text messages show.
The TV journalist offered to reach out to "sources," including other reporters, to find out whether more women were going to come forward and relayed what he was hearing to his brother's advisers, according to the materials made public Monday.
Another Cuomo in hot water .
Are Fredo’s days at DNCNN numbered ? ?
Remember when dynamic duo were must see TV for the tards during the pandemic ?
?
The TV journalist offered to reach out to "sources," including other reporters, to find out whether more women were going to come forward and relayed what he was hearing to his brother's advisers, according to the materials made public Monday.
Another Cuomo in hot water .
Are Fredo’s days at DNCNN numbered ? ?
Remember when dynamic duo were must see TV for the tards during the pandemic ?
?
Good try and
Just spoke with the Feds and they provided me a transcript of their call with savage1:
[phone ringing]
Feds: FBI, this is special agent [redacted].
savage1: Hi, this is [redacted], I would like to file a complaint.
Feds: for?
savage1: against someone posting stuff in a forum that makes me very uncomfortable.
Feds: continue.
savage1: There is someone there, he goes by the name sportsbookdata. He posts a lot of stuff that I don't agree with and it makes me very uncomfortable.
Feds: Why does it make you so uncomfortable? Is he threatening you or your family?
savage1: Umm, not per se, but his his posts threaten me.
Feds: why is that?
savage1: Because it's all the opposite of what CNN and MSN tells me what to think.
Feds: why does it bother you so much?
savage1: because everything he says almost always comes true.
Feds: We don't understand, what's the problem then?
savage1: he keeps spreading misinformation about Biden not being President and always saying Trump will be President again.
Feds: You do know Biden isn't president, right?
savage1: huh?
Feds: Yeah, Biden isn't the president.
savage1: how can you say this? Biden won the election.
Feds: uh, no he didn't.
savage1: yes he did. CNN said he got 81 million votes, the most in history.
Feds: yeah CNN told you millions were dying from covid too [laughing].
savage1: yes there are millions dying.
Feds: Uhh, no there isn't. It's all a game, don't you understand they don't care about you, they are just making shit up so they can shoot you up with a deadly vaccine.
savage1: why would you say that? the science proves this virus is very deadly and that the vaccine works.
Feds: what science son?
savage1: the science Dr. Fauci follows.
Feds: Fauci, are you serious?
savage1: Yes, he was the man of the year for a reason.
Feds: he was also wrong 100% of the time. Speaking of "time" you do understand Time magazine who said Fauci was man of the Year is owned by the same people that want to shoot you up wit an experimental drug, right?
savage1: No this is not true. Time magazine is very reputable. I rank them right up there with Anderson Cooper and Don Lemon.
Feds: Are you serious?
savage1: Yes.
Feds: do you live under a rock or in your mom's basement?
savage1: [laughing] No but I appreciate your sense of humor.
Feds: we are not being funny. Only a moron would believe Cooper and Lemon are credible reporters. And only a moron would think covid is real and that Biden is president.
savage1: Well I take offense to this. I'm a very smart man who was a very senior investigator with the Massachusetts Welfare Department. I know a thing or two you know.
Feds: Yeah, well you are about to get a free education in the U.S. Constitution.
savage1: that's what he always says.
Feds: who?
savage1: the guy at the forum.
Feds: are you sure it's not the guy in your head? [laughing]
savage1: he kind of is in my head too.
Feds: what do you mean?
savage1: he's the first thing I think of every morning and the last thing i think of at night.
Feds: Do you support LGBT?
savage1: yes I do.
Feds: we seem like the type of person that would. Perhaps you just have a man crush. [laughing]
savage1: [laughing] no I don't. I already have partner. His name is wilbur.
Feds: to each his own. [laughing]
Feds: How old are you sir?
savage1: 78
Feds: Okay, now we understand what you mean by senior. Have you had any cognizant tests recently?
savage1: No.
Feds: we strongly suggest you do.
savage1: let's get back to this guy in the forum.
Feds: what's his name?
savage1: I don't know.
Feds: where does he live?
savage1: I don't know.
Feds: do you have conversations with him frequently?
savage1: sort of.
Feds: what do you mean?
savage1: I post all day every day but he never responds to me.
Feds: why not?
savage1: I'm not sure but probably because I am killing it with my posts.
Feds: Is this happening in your thread or a thread created by him.
savage1: by him.
Feds: so to be clear, you are in his thread, posting all day every day and he doesn't respond to you, is this correct?
savage1: yes, but I know he reads my posts.
Feds: How do you know this? Do you have proof you can send us?
savage1: yes, I printed out the entire thread so you can see his posts.
Feds: To be honest we are not concerned with his posts, we are concerned with the proof you have that he is reading your posts.
savage1: well, I don't really have that.
Feds: So let's get this straight... you are in a public chat room, in someone's else's thread, talking to yourself, thinking you are killing it with every post, thinking he is reading your posts, but have no proof of it?
savage1: yes this is correct, can you find him and go after him?
Feds: Are you stupid sir? It's you we should come after for wasting our time with this delusional nonsense. Again, the only advice we have for you is to seek professional help and get that cognizant test done asap. Something isn't right with you and, although we do not give professional advice, we are of the opinion you should either be highly medicated or institutionalized.
savage1: You are making a big mistake pal. I know people in high places. I will be calling my old supervisor at the State Welfare Department to file a complaint about you.
Feds: [laughing] [click, hang up]
I will give you credit for a change showing that you that at least somewhere in your being the potential is there toJust spoke with the Feds and they provided me a transcript of their call with savage1:
[phone ringing]
Feds: FBI, this is special agent [redacted].
savage1: Hi, this is [redacted], I would like to file a complaint.
Feds: for?
savage1: against someone posting stuff in a forum that makes me very uncomfortable.
Feds: continue.
savage1: There is someone there, he goes by the name sportsbookdata. He posts a lot of stuff that I don't agree with and it makes me very uncomfortable.
Feds: Why does it make you so uncomfortable? Is he threatening you or your family?
savage1: Umm, not per se, but his his posts threaten me.
Feds: why is that?
savage1: Because it's all the opposite of what CNN and MSN tells me what to think.
Feds: why does it bother you so much?
savage1: because everything he says almost always comes true.
Feds: We don't understand, what's the problem then?
savage1: he keeps spreading misinformation about Biden not being President and always saying Trump will be President again.
Feds: You do know Biden isn't president, right?
savage1: huh?
Feds: Yeah, Biden isn't the president.
savage1: how can you say this? Biden won the election.
Feds: uh, no he didn't.
savage1: yes he did. CNN said he got 81 million votes, the most in history.
Feds: yeah CNN told you millions were dying from covid too [laughing].
savage1: yes there are millions dying.
Feds: Uhh, no there isn't. It's all a game, don't you understand they don't care about you, they are just making shit up so they can shoot you up with a deadly vaccine.
savage1: why would you say that? the science proves this virus is very deadly and that the vaccine works.
Feds: what science son?
savage1: the science Dr. Fauci follows.
Feds: Fauci, are you serious?
savage1: Yes, he was the man of the year for a reason.
Feds: he was also wrong 100% of the time. Speaking of "time" you do understand Time magazine who said Fauci was man of the Year is owned by the same people that want to shoot you up wit an experimental drug, right?
savage1: No this is not true. Time magazine is very reputable. I rank them right up there with Anderson Cooper and Don Lemon.
Feds: Are you serious?
savage1: Yes.
Feds: do you live under a rock or in your mom's basement?
savage1: [laughing] No but I appreciate your sense of humor.
Feds: we are not being funny. Only a moron would believe Cooper and Lemon are credible reporters. And only a moron would think covid is real and that Biden is president.
savage1: Well I take offense to this. I'm a very smart man who was a very senior investigator with the Massachusetts Welfare Department. I know a thing or two you know.
Feds: Yeah, well you are about to get a free education in the U.S. Constitution.
savage1: that's what he always says.
Feds: who?
savage1: the guy at the forum.
Feds: are you sure it's not the guy in your head? [laughing]
savage1: he kind of is in my head too.
Feds: what do you mean?
savage1: he's the first thing I think of every morning and the last thing i think of at night.
Feds: Do you support LGBT?
savage1: yes I do.
Feds: we seem like the type of person that would. Perhaps you just have a man crush. [laughing]
savage1: [laughing] no I don't. I already have partner. His name is wilbur.
Feds: to each his own. [laughing]
Feds: How old are you sir?
savage1: 78
Feds: Okay, now we understand what you mean by senior. Have you had any cognizant tests recently?
savage1: No.
Feds: we strongly suggest you do.
savage1: let's get back to this guy in the forum.
Feds: what's his name?
savage1: I don't know.
Feds: where does he live?
savage1: I don't know.
Feds: do you have conversations with him frequently?
savage1: sort of.
Feds: what do you mean?
savage1: I post all day every day but he never responds to me.
Feds: why not?
savage1: I'm not sure but probably because I am killing it with my posts.
Feds: Is this happening in your thread or a thread created by him.
savage1: by him.
Feds: so to be clear, you are in his thread, posting all day every day and he doesn't respond to you, is this correct?
savage1: yes, but I know he reads my posts.
Feds: How do you know this? Do you have proof you can send us?
savage1: yes, I printed out the entire thread so you can see his posts.
Feds: To be honest we are not concerned with his posts, we are concerned with the proof you have that he is reading your posts.
savage1: well, I don't really have that.
Feds: So let's get this straight... you are in a public chat room, in someone's else's thread, talking to yourself, thinking you are killing it with every post, thinking he is reading your posts, but have no proof of it?
savage1: yes this is correct, can you find him and go after him?
Feds: Are you stupid sir? It's you we should come after for wasting our time with this delusional nonsense. Again, the only advice we have for you is to seek professional help and get that cognizant test done asap. Something isn't right with you and, although we do not give professional advice, we are of the opinion you should either be highly medicated or institutionalized.
savage1: You are making a big mistake pal. I know people in high places. I will be calling my old supervisor at the State Welfare Department to file a complaint about you.
Feds: [laughing] [click, hang up]
show that you do have a sense of humor rather than the borg-like/robotic/stiff manner in which your post every day.
That said, when all is said and done, your post amounts to the same things which I have documented about you such as begging
the question, poisoning the well, illogic, nonsequiturs, contradictions and inconsistencies with the notable difference
being that you are projecting your own deficiencies onto the feds.
Two corrections though:
1) Not that it matters that much, but I am 77 rather than 78.
2) I do not support LGBT and imo these folks are in serious need of professional help, the same as you.
Finally, I am curious as to how you know about all of the stuff you cited about me in your parody,
Since your say you don't read my posts, did all of this come to you because of your psychic abilities, did
one of your "friends" in this thread tell you via pm what I said or did you find out by some other means?
If you don't read my posts, then I certainly don't expect a response from you unless of course what I just stated is true.
Kindly comment on this apparent contradiction/paradox.
Could Joe be the "next one" to be sent to GITMO for trial and execution??Joe Biden was involved in a deal with Hunter and a Chinese giant — and was expecting a 10% cut
Oneida would be split according to an email sent by James Gilliar to the group on May 13, 2017, laying out the distribution of shares.
“The equity will be distributed as follows,” wrote Gilliar, listing the shares in percentages.
“20 H [Hunter]
“20 RW [Walker]
“20 JG [Gilliar]
“20 TB [Bobulinski]
“10 Jim [Biden]
“10 held by H for the big guy.”
https://nypost.com/2021/11/29/joe-biden-expected-10-percent-cut-in-deal-with-a-chinese-giant
Like the op stated at the onset of this thread, and maintained throughout, "don't forget 10% for the big guy".
When "conspiracy" becomes truth.
If so, I hope for the sake of his six or more body doubles, the folks doing the arresting don't mistake one of them for Biden
and execute one of them instead!! lol
Bring on the crash if you are right for a change(.2% of the time)!!
Again, you can't hide inflation forever.
You can't hide the REAL data forever.
Omicron not only helps them force feed the vaxx but it also provides them with a reason for the imminent crash.
I got plenty of cash on the sidelines to cash in if the market shows that we have entered a bear market and/or to adjust
the portion of my portfolio which I manage.
Joe Biden was involved in a deal with Hunter and a Chinese giant — and was expecting a 10% cut
Oneida would be split according to an email sent by James Gilliar to the group on May 13, 2017, laying out the distribution of shares.
“The equity will be distributed as follows,” wrote Gilliar, listing the shares in percentages.
“20 H [Hunter]
“20 RW [Walker]
“20 JG [Gilliar]
“20 TB [Bobulinski]
“10 Jim [Biden]
“10 held by H for the big guy.”
https://nypost.com/2021/11/29/joe-biden-expected-10-percent-cut-in-deal-with-a-chinese-giant
Like the op stated at the onset of this thread, and maintained throughout, "don't forget 10% for the big guy".
When "conspiracy" becomes truth.
Flashback
NATIONAL SECURITY
Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say
More than 50 former intelligence officials signed a letter casting doubt on the provenance of a New York Post story on the former vice president's son.
But there’s no such thing as the Deep State .
They knew exactly the legitimacy of the Post Story .
And they gave cover for the lying senile shit stain in the WH to use it as his defense in his debate with Trump when meth mouth’s laptop question came up .
Greater concerns about the virus could reduce people's willingness to work in person, which would slow progress in the labor market and intensify supply-chain disruptions," Powell wrote in his testimony.
Lol !
News flash . The virus will continue to mutate and although strains can become more contagious they do become much weaker .
These clowns should take a message from Gov. DeSantis and not live their lives in fear .
My only response to this is that the virus and its variants and the future potential contained therein are unknown at this time.
Unlike as is the case in handicapping a horse race, where one can evaluate a given horse's chance of winning based on
past performance, we really don't have one when it comes to Covid as it is still evolving.
Thus, imo the term "not living one's life in fear" is not the correct term here to describe the situation because of the fact
that as we have seen with the variants/mutations it is still evolving.
Personally I believe that science and technology will EVENTUALLY rid the world of this disease.
I respect those who see things differently, but I don't respect at all anyone who tries to dismiss the Virus as one gigantic hoax,
and such nonsense that it is not to be taken any more seriously than a common cold-that is just pure denial of the
facts and statistics surrounding this Virus.
I myself have taken a sort of in-between approach to this Virus subject to change depending on circumstances.
Since I have received both vaccinations, I no longer wear a mask when I go shopping, go to restaurants or other public
places even though I see many folks who still do.
If I see clear evidence that conditions/infections are worsening here in Massachusetts where I reside, I may very well
start wearing a mask again and stay home as much as possible such as I did when Covid first made its presence known.
In short, I am taking a wait-and-see approach moving forward.
Obviously being happily retired, financially secure and not having to go to work every day put me in an advantageous position over
those who are not in that position and have to make the decision as to whether to go to work and get vaccinated,
using whatever criterion they choose to make that decision.
Unlike as is the case in handicapping a horse race, where one can evaluate a given horse's chance of winning based on
past performance, we really don't have one when it comes to Covid as it is still evolving.
Thus, imo the term "not living one's life in fear" is not the correct term here to describe the situation because of the fact
that as we have seen with the variants/mutations it is still evolving.
Personally I believe that science and technology will EVENTUALLY rid the world of this disease.
I respect those who see things differently, but I don't respect at all anyone who tries to dismiss the Virus as one gigantic hoax,
and such nonsense that it is not to be taken any more seriously than a common cold-that is just pure denial of the
facts and statistics surrounding this Virus.
I myself have taken a sort of in-between approach to this Virus subject to change depending on circumstances.
Since I have received both vaccinations, I no longer wear a mask when I go shopping, go to restaurants or other public
places even though I see many folks who still do.
If I see clear evidence that conditions/infections are worsening here in Massachusetts where I reside, I may very well
start wearing a mask again and stay home as much as possible such as I did when Covid first made its presence known.
In short, I am taking a wait-and-see approach moving forward.
Obviously being happily retired, financially secure and not having to go to work every day put me in an advantageous position over
those who are not in that position and have to make the decision as to whether to go to work and get vaccinated,
using whatever criterion they choose to make that decision.
