Governor DeSantis steps up big again!
"In Florida, we will not let them lock you down. We will not let them take your jobs. We will not let them harm your businesses. We will not let them close your schools. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.”
What a REAL Governor looks like.
They don't bother with relatively harnless folks like him!!What are you gonna do? Report him to the FBI?
ot I had trouble deciding where to grab some quick dinner tonight.folks.
Then the revelation hit me to go to somewhere symbolic of this thread.
Thus I finally chose Chick-fil-A because the name is truly representative and symbolic of chickenshit folks like fpp/sbd who pretend to
put me on ignore rather than to try to defend themselves or even debate me because well they realize that everything that I have
said and documented about them is 100% true, and that they would dig their graves even deeper if they dared to try to dispute it!!
Then the revelation hit me to go to somewhere symbolic of this thread.
Thus I finally chose Chick-fil-A because the name is truly representative and symbolic of chickenshit folks like fpp/sbd who pretend to
put me on ignore rather than to try to defend themselves or even debate me because well they realize that everything that I have
said and documented about them is 100% true, and that they would dig their graves even deeper if they dared to try to dispute it!!
Just spoke with the Feds and they provided me a transcript of their call with savage1:
[phone ringing]
Feds: FBI, this is special agent [redacted].
savage1: Hi, this is [redacted], I would like to file a complaint.
Feds: for?
savage1: against someone posting stuff in a forum that makes me very uncomfortable.
Feds: continue.
savage1: There is someone there, he goes by the name sportsbookdata. He posts a lot of stuff that I don't agree with and it makes me very uncomfortable.
Feds: Why does it make you so uncomfortable? Is he threatening you or your family?
savage1: Umm, not per se, but his his posts threaten me.
Feds: why is that?
savage1: Because it's all the opposite of what CNN and MSN tells me what to think.
Feds: why does it bother you so much?
savage1: because everything he says almost always comes true.
Feds: We don't understand, what's the problem then?
savage1: he keeps spreading misinformation about Biden not being President and always saying Trump will be President again.
Feds: You do know Biden isn't president, right?
savage1: huh?
Feds: Yeah, Biden isn't the president.
savage1: how can you say this? Biden won the election.
Feds: uh, no he didn't.
savage1: yes he did. CNN said he got 81 million votes, the most in history.
Feds: yeah CNN told you millions were dying from covid too [laughing].
savage1: yes there are millions dying.
Feds: Uhh, no there isn't. It's all a game, don't you understand they don't care about you, they are just making shit up so they can shoot you up with a deadly vaccine.
savage1: why would you say that? the science proves this virus is very deadly and that the vaccine works.
Feds: what science son?
savage1: the science Dr. Fauci follows.
Feds: Fauci, are you serious?
savage1: Yes, he was the man of the year for a reason.
Feds: he was also wrong 100% of the time. Speaking of "time" you do understand Time magazine who said Fauci was man of the Year is owned by the same people that want to shoot you up wit an experimental drug, right?
savage1: No this is not true. Time magazine is very reputable. I rank them right up there with Anderson Cooper and Don Lemon.
Feds: Are you serious?
savage1: Yes.
Feds: do you live under a rock or in your mom's basement?
savage1: [laughing] No but I appreciate your sense of humor.
Feds: we are not being funny. Only a moron would believe Cooper and Lemon are credible reporters. And only a moron would think covid is real and that Biden is president.
savage1: Well I take offense to this. I'm a very smart man who was a very senior investigator with the Massachusetts Welfare Department. I know a thing or two you know.
Feds: Yeah, well you are about to get a free education in the U.S. Constitution.
savage1: that's what he always says.
Feds: who?
savage1: the guy at the forum.
Feds: are you sure it's not the guy in your head? [laughing]
savage1: he kind of is in my head too.
Feds: what do you mean?
savage1: he's the first thing I think of every morning and the last thing i think of at night.
Feds: Do you support LGBT?
savage1: yes I do.
Feds: we seem like the type of person that would. Perhaps you just have a man crush. [laughing]
savage1: [laughing] no I don't. I already have partner. His name is wilbur.
Feds: to each his own. [laughing]
Feds: How old are you sir?
savage1: 78
Feds: Okay, now we understand what you mean by senior. Have you had any cognizant tests recently?
savage1: No.
Feds: we strongly suggest you do.
savage1: let's get back to this guy in the forum.
Feds: what's his name?
savage1: I don't know.
Feds: where does he live?
savage1: I don't know.
Feds: do you have conversations with him frequently?
savage1: sort of.
Feds: what do you mean?
savage1: I post all day every day but he never responds to me.
Feds: why not?
savage1: I'm not sure but probably because I am killing it with my posts.
Feds: Is this happening in your thread or a thread created by him.
savage1: by him.
Feds: so to be clear, you are in his thread, posting all day every day and he doesn't respond to you, is this correct?
savage1: yes, but I know he reads my posts.
Feds: How do you know this? Do you have proof you can send us?
savage1: yes, I printed out the entire thread so you can see his posts.
Feds: To be honest we are not concerned with his posts, we are concerned with the proof you have that he is reading your posts.
savage1: well, I don't really have that.
Feds: So let's get this straight... you are in a public chat room, in someone's else's thread, talking to yourself, thinking you are killing it with every post, thinking he is reading your posts, but have no proof of it?
savage1: yes this is correct, can you find him and go after him?
Feds: Are you stupid sir? It's you we should come after for wasting our time with this delusional nonsense. Again, the only advice we have for you is to seek professional help and get that cognizant test done asap. Something isn't right with you and, although we do not give professional advice, we are of the opinion you should either be highly medicated or institutionalized.
savage1: You are making a big mistake pal. I know people in high places. I will be calling my old supervisor at the State Welfare Department to file a complaint about you.
Feds: [laughing] [click, hang up]
DELUSIONAL^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Just spoke with the Feds and they provided me a transcript of their call with savage1:
[phone ringing]
Feds: FBI, this is special agent [redacted].
savage1: Hi, this is [redacted], I would like to file a complaint.
Feds: for?
savage1: against someone posting stuff in a forum that makes me very uncomfortable.
Feds: continue.
savage1: There is someone there, he goes by the name sportsbookdata. He posts a lot of stuff that I don't agree with and it makes me very uncomfortable.
Feds: Why does it make you so uncomfortable? Is he threatening you or your family?
savage1: Umm, not per se, but his his posts threaten me.
Feds: why is that?
savage1: Because it's all the opposite of what CNN and MSN tells me what to think.
Feds: why does it bother you so much?
savage1: because everything he says almost always comes true.
Feds: We don't understand, what's the problem then?
savage1: he keeps spreading misinformation about Biden not being President and always saying Trump will be President again.
Feds: You do know Biden isn't president, right?
savage1: huh?
Feds: Yeah, Biden isn't the president.
savage1: how can you say this? Biden won the election.
Feds: uh, no he didn't.
savage1: yes he did. CNN said he got 81 million votes, the most in history.
Feds: yeah CNN told you millions were dying from covid too [laughing].
savage1: yes there are millions dying.
Feds: Uhh, no there isn't. It's all a game, don't you understand they don't care about you, they are just making shit up so they can shoot you up with a deadly vaccine.
savage1: why would you say that? the science proves this virus is very deadly and that the vaccine works.
Feds: what science son?
savage1: the science Dr. Fauci follows.
Feds: Fauci, are you serious?
savage1: Yes, he was the man of the year for a reason.
Feds: he was also wrong 100% of the time. Speaking of "time" you do understand Time magazine who said Fauci was man of the Year is owned by the same people that want to shoot you up wit an experimental drug, right?
savage1: No this is not true. Time magazine is very reputable. I rank them right up there with Anderson Cooper and Don Lemon.
Feds: Are you serious?
savage1: Yes.
Feds: do you live under a rock or in your mom's basement?
savage1: [laughing] No but I appreciate your sense of humor.
Feds: we are not being funny. Only a moron would believe Cooper and Lemon are credible reporters. And only a moron would think covid is real and that Biden is president.
savage1: Well I take offense to this. I'm a very smart man who was a very senior investigator with the Massachusetts Welfare Department. I know a thing or two you know.
Feds: Yeah, well you are about to get a free education in the U.S. Constitution.
savage1: that's what he always says.
Feds: who?
savage1: the guy at the forum.
Feds: are you sure it's not the guy in your head? [laughing]
savage1: he kind of is in my head too.
Feds: what do you mean?
savage1: he's the first thing I think of every morning and the last thing i think of at night.
Feds: Do you support LGBT?
savage1: yes I do.
Feds: we seem like the type of person that would. Perhaps you just have a man crush. [laughing]
savage1: [laughing] no I don't. I already have partner. His name is wilbur.
Feds: to each his own. [laughing]
Feds: How old are you sir?
savage1: 78
Feds: Okay, now we understand what you mean by senior. Have you had any cognizant tests recently?
savage1: No.
Feds: we strongly suggest you do.
savage1: let's get back to this guy in the forum.
Feds: what's his name?
savage1: I don't know.
Feds: where does he live?
savage1: I don't know.
Feds: do you have conversations with him frequently?
savage1: sort of.
Feds: what do you mean?
savage1: I post all day every day but he never responds to me.
Feds: why not?
savage1: I'm not sure but probably because I am killing it with my posts.
Feds: Is this happening in your thread or a thread created by him.
savage1: by him.
Feds: so to be clear, you are in his thread, posting all day every day and he doesn't respond to you, is this correct?
savage1: yes, but I know he reads my posts.
Feds: How do you know this? Do you have proof you can send us?
savage1: yes, I printed out the entire thread so you can see his posts.
Feds: To be honest we are not concerned with his posts, we are concerned with the proof you have that he is reading your posts.
savage1: well, I don't really have that.
Feds: So let's get this straight... you are in a public chat room, in someone's else's thread, talking to yourself, thinking you are killing it with every post, thinking he is reading your posts, but have no proof of it?
savage1: yes this is correct, can you find him and go after him?
Feds: Are you stupid sir? It's you we should come after for wasting our time with this delusional nonsense. Again, the only advice we have for you is to seek professional help and get that cognizant test done asap. Something isn't right with you and, although we do not give professional advice, we are of the opinion you should either be highly medicated or institutionalized.
savage1: You are making a big mistake pal. I know people in high places. I will be calling my old supervisor at the State Welfare Department to file a complaint about you.
Feds: [laughing] [click, hang up]
Just one more thing to consider before fpp/sbd or anyone else decides to cast aspersions I did as a person who as part
of the job needed to expose welfare fraud(not by any means all of my job, as I was a Quality Control Specialist, whose
primary function as well as that of others who did the same thing was to determine eligibility and the correctness of
benefits of received based on a randomly selected sample each month.
The point is that I and the others had to be completely objective in our findings with no regard to political affiliations.
I mention this because I have been portrayed by some i this thread as very liberal when in fact nothing could be further from the truth.
If I was as liberal as some of you folks think I am, believe me I could have easily twisted the data in favor of those who committed fraud.
Actually going back to the 60;s era, many of my associates in my life were very liberally minded.
In fact before I graduated to by QC Specialist job, I was just an everyday eligibility worked who determined eligibility
and assessed their overall needs.
Let's just say that many of my co-workers were so incredibly liberal in that they wanted to hand over there the ranch to
recipients such as brand new furniture(sometimes without even documentation that they actually needed it), it really angered
me,
I took the time to go to their apartments to determine if they really needed everything they requested.
The bottom line is that sometimes they needed all of it and sometimes they did not.
Thank God a couple of years later this mass giveaway program ended and the reliability requirements became much stricter.
Conclusion-you are making a big mistake if you refer to me as a liberal , whereas as I already stated, in
fact the original welfare rules and regulations were way too liberal for me.
Actually,some of my views are far from liberal as I am anti-abortion, against gay marriage and homosexuality, all of which
are much closer to the Republican way of thinking!!
That's it!!
Thanks to anyone who took the time to read this-I really wanted to get this off of my chest!!
of the job needed to expose welfare fraud(not by any means all of my job, as I was a Quality Control Specialist, whose
primary function as well as that of others who did the same thing was to determine eligibility and the correctness of
benefits of received based on a randomly selected sample each month.
The point is that I and the others had to be completely objective in our findings with no regard to political affiliations.
I mention this because I have been portrayed by some i this thread as very liberal when in fact nothing could be further from the truth.
If I was as liberal as some of you folks think I am, believe me I could have easily twisted the data in favor of those who committed fraud.
Actually going back to the 60;s era, many of my associates in my life were very liberally minded.
In fact before I graduated to by QC Specialist job, I was just an everyday eligibility worked who determined eligibility
and assessed their overall needs.
Let's just say that many of my co-workers were so incredibly liberal in that they wanted to hand over there the ranch to
recipients such as brand new furniture(sometimes without even documentation that they actually needed it), it really angered
me,
I took the time to go to their apartments to determine if they really needed everything they requested.
The bottom line is that sometimes they needed all of it and sometimes they did not.
Thank God a couple of years later this mass giveaway program ended and the reliability requirements became much stricter.
Conclusion-you are making a big mistake if you refer to me as a liberal , whereas as I already stated, in
fact the original welfare rules and regulations were way too liberal for me.
Actually,some of my views are far from liberal as I am anti-abortion, against gay marriage and homosexuality, all of which
are much closer to the Republican way of thinking!!
That's it!!
Thanks to anyone who took the time to read this-I really wanted to get this off of my chest!!
Please explain PRECISELY how and why I am delusional, based on what empirical and visible evidence?
Personal opinions are not evidence, sorry!!
And the same applies to chickenshit-what am I chickenshit about PRECISELY??
Unlike you I don't run away and hide when faced with tough but relevant questions such as I asked you.
"Perhaps" it is you who are the REAL chickenshit and are simply projecting your feelings onto me, the same as fpp/sbd!!
The difference between you and me is that I use specifics and document what I say, whereas you simply resort to
vague generalizations WITHOUT any specifics and of course namecalling, which is typical of folks who don't have the intelligence
and/or any material which will resonate with any intelligent person.
wilbur
Joe Biden was involved in a deal with Hunter and a Chinese giant — and was expecting a 10% cut
Oneida would be split according to an email sent by James Gilliar to the group on May 13, 2017, laying out the distribution of shares.“The equity will be distributed as follows,” wrote Gilliar, listing the shares in percentages.
“20 H [Hunter]
“20 RW [Walker]
“20 JG [Gilliar]
“20 TB [Bobulinski]
“10 Jim [Biden]
“10 held by H for the big guy.”
https://nypost.com/2021/11/29/joe-biden-expected-10-percent-cut-in-deal-with-a-chinese-giant
Like the op stated at the onset of this thread, and maintained throughout, "don't forget 10% for the big guy".
When "conspiracy" becomes truth.
