IMPORTANT VIRUS UPDATE - THE SEQUEL

Search

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,134
Tokens
^^^

:lmao:


Because you know the insurrection he incited that JackMeOff couldn’t pull the trigger on the indictment .



If Trump is the GOP nominee, you can expect he will be prevented from holding office under the United States Constitution, thereby handing an automatic victory to the sclerotic Joe Biden.
Just tell me what YOUR legal background is in comparison to the scholars cited and/or why she would accept

your OPINION on this which really offers nothing but a laughing emoji and basically repeating in essence what

was written in the article but with ZERO explanation why it is wrong and/or for that matter a legal explanation from your

end as to why the possibility doesn't even exist!!

Actually, I disagree with the last sentence but only in the sense that Joe Biden will not win the Presidency because he will

not be the nominee because of several well-known and valid possibilities.
 

RX Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
16,168
Tokens
Just tell me what YOUR legal background is in comparison and/or why she would accept your OPINION on this which really

offers nothing but a laughing emoji and basically repeating in essence what was written in the article but with ZERO explanation

why it is wrong and/or for that matter a legal explanation from your end as to why the possibility doesn't even exist!!

Actually, I disagree with the last sentence but only in the sense that Joe Biden will not win the Presidency because he will

not be the nominee because of several valid possibilities.


I don’t need a legal background . Read the Constitution and tell me what disqualifies a candidate from running .

And if it’s the part about an insurrection , tell me exactly who determines his eligibility / disqualification .
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,134
Tokens
I don’t need a legal background . Red the Constitution and tell me what disqualifies a candidate from running .

And if it’s the part about an insurrection , tell me exactly who determines his eligibility .
You don't need a legal background-do you realize what you are saying here!!

In essence, you are saying that your interpretation of the Constitution is more valid than folks who have degrees in this stuff

and do it for a living!!

Perhaps by your manner of thinking, you don't need a doctor/surgeon when you are sick, a dentist when you have tooth problems,

an exterminator if your home is infested with insects, or even better an attorney to represent yourself if you find yourself in any kind of

legal problem because you can do it better on your own!!

Seriously, for reasons I have stated before, I understand that the thought of Trump not winning the 2024 Election is

very and I mean very painful to you for psychological and emotional reasons, some of which I have suggested before, but

to simply brush off and sweep under the rug the opinions of anyone especially someone who is qualified to offer

one is something that says a lot about you-let's leave it at that.

To be fair, as you know, Alan Dershowitz has issues with the investigations and indictments also, and while I don't agree with

him, unlike you, I would never make a fool out of myself by inferring that because I don't agree with him, that I am in a better

position to offer and opinion than he does, which is in essence what you have done with your commentary!!
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,134
Tokens

Not surprising as all of Trump's attorneys are simply an extension of him and his overall criminal modus operandi!!
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,134
Tokens

I will ask the question again.

Who believes that the article above is true or on the other hand agrees with sbd's contention that Hamlin died on the football field

in Buffalo back in January from cardiac arrest caused by the Covid Vaccination, which means that this news is all about an impostor,

holograph, or some other kind of image which also has the football skills necessary to play in the NFL-yeah right!! lol
 

RX Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
16,168
Tokens
You don't need a legal background-do you realize what you are saying here!!

In essence, you are saying that your interpretation of the Constitution is more valid than folks who have degrees in this stuff

and do it for a living!!

Perhaps by your manner of thinking, you don't need a doctor/surgeon when you are sick, a dentist when you have tooth problems,

an exterminator if your home is infested with insects, or even better an attorney to represent yourself if you find yourself in any kind of

legal problem because you can do it better on your own!!

Seriously, for reasons I have stated before, I understand that the thought of Trump not winning the 2024 Election is

very and I mean very painful to you for psychological and emotional reasons, some of which I have suggested before, but

to simply brush off and sweep under the rug the opinions of anyone especially someone who is qualified to offer

one is something that says a lot about you-let's leave it at that.

To be fair, as you know, Alan Dershowitz has issues with the investigations and indictments also, and while I don't agree with

him, unlike you, I would never make a fool out of myself by inferring that because I don't agree with him, that I am in a better

position to offer and opinion than he does, which is in essence what you have done with your commentary!!

I don’t see your response as to who/ what determines his eligibility or the procedure/s used to stop him .
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,134
Tokens
I don’t see your response as to who/ what determines his eligibility or the procedure/s used to stop him .
I answered the question with my reference to the contents of the article!!

If you think your logic and reasoning are better than constitutional scholars, then so be it!!

In any case, who are you to ask for a response from me when you have avoided and run away from

and hidden to hundreds of my questions to you when I have made points and asked your questions for which

you have no answers!!

Go back and answer those first and then we can talk!!

Just as importantly, if instead of holding to your steadfast opinion that Trump is 100% innocent of all charges in all of the investigations,,

that none of the documentation by Jack Smith et al has any merit and/or are lies, and that speaking of lies, Trump didn't tell

even one during his four years as POTUS let alone 33,000 DOCUMENTED ONES, you come to a sense of and admit to

at least some criminal or at least the possibility of criminal intent, I can't take much that you take all that seriously,

the same as with any other OBJECTIVE person who has read your condom-like protect Trump no matter since

you started posting here!!

Just give up a heads-up of what you are going to say in the way of name-calling and/or insults and rationalization

if in the "rare" chance that Trump is convicted and heaven forbid, indicted!!

Time for lunch, Mr. Trump's bodyguard and protective armor,!!

Back later afternoon!!

Have fun!!
 

RX Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
16,168
Tokens
I answered the question with my reference to the contents of the article!!

If you think your logic and reasoning are better than constitutional scholars, then so be it!!

In any case, who are you to ask for a response from me when you have avoided and run away from

and hidden to hundreds of my questions to you when I have made points and asked your questions for which

you have no answers!!

Go back and answer those first and then we can talk!!

Just as importantly, if instead of holding to your steadfast opinion that Trump is 100% innocent of all charges in all of the investigations,,

that none of the documentation by Jack Smith et al has any merit and/or are lies, and that speaking of lies, Trump didn't tell

even one during his four years as POTUS let alone 33,000 DOCUMENTED ONES, you come to a sense of and admit to

at least some criminal or at least the possibility of criminal intent, I can't take much that you take all that seriously,

the same as with any other OBJECTIVE person who has read your condom-like protect Trump no matter since

you started posting here!!

Just give up a heads-up of what you are going to say in the way of name-calling and/or insults and rationalization

if in the "rare" chance that Trump is convicted and heaven forbid, indicted!!

Time for lunch, Mr. Trump's bodyguard and protective armor,!!

Back later afternoon!!

Have fun!!


Aaah yes ! Those Constitutional scholars . The same scholars that labeled a Russian asset from the day he took office .


Ok got it . According to the article , he will first be convicted but not from the statue that cites insurrection .

Then Dems will argue ( no idea what he’s referring to ) that Trump is Constitutionally banned from running while not even being convicted of said crime .

Then the author says he’s highly skeptical of the Supreme Court siding with Trump for inciting in an insurrection where no such charges were brought against him .

?‍♂️
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,134
Tokens

Here is an appetizer until I get back from my bike ride which is REALLY imminent rather than Trump's return/reinstatement/devolution

which the sbd/sheriff Hoe and now doctor success entry in this thread has claimed is imminent on a daily basis for the last

31 months!!
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
10,788
Tokens

I will ask the question again.

Who believes that the article above is true or on the other hand agrees with sbd's contention that Hamlin died on the football field

in Buffalo back in January from cardiac arrest caused by the Covid Vaccination, which means that this news is all about an impostor,

holograph, or some other kind of image which also has the football skills necessary to play in the NFL-yeah right!! lol
I ask.... Do you think Hunter will ever be drug tested, was ordered on July 26th... :+clueless
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,134
Tokens
I ask.... Do you think Hunter will ever be drug tested, was ordered on July 26th... :+clueless
I hope so and also that if he and/or Joe are indicted and are found guilty of anything criminal in intent, they are punished

accordingly to the full extent of the law.

Good luck trying to get the Trump entry and this thread and Lenny from issuing a similar statement as it regards Trump!!
 

RX Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
16,168
Tokens
80 million “votes” and his handlers are terrified to let him speak .

But he’s unbeatable if he faces Trump again .

Don’t any Biden supporters want to hear the good news on the economy , the border , or America’s waining support for the war in Ukraine from the useful idiot ?

?

 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,134
Tokens

Imo as is the case with Trump, this lady is about to get her just due for her role in all of this!!
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
10,788
Tokens
I hope so and also that if he and/or Joe are indicted and are found guilty of anything criminal in intent, they are punished

accordingly to the full extent of the law.

Good luck trying to get the Trump entry and this thread and Lenny from issuing a similar statement as it regards Trump!!
The Random Drug test is the 1st step would not be a problem if it wasn't court ordered . Not being followed up on is Criminal and apparently somebody isn't doing their job?
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,134
Tokens

Forum statistics

Threads
1,116,590
Messages
13,535,110
Members
100,377
Latest member
nocash117
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com