I am reposting this proposed bet I posted earlier.
I don't expect anyone to accept it because as usual the persons to whom it is directed are all mouth and can talk the talk but not back it
up by walking the walk!!
"Since it looks like it could be an important week regarding a possible ruling of the SCOTUS and maybe some other court regarding
what could happen, I am offering a proposed wager to Lenny or anyone who cares to take it, that is good for the first taker only.
My proposed bet is that before the 2024 Election Trump is going to be convicted in at least one of the indictments.
Whoever loses imposes a two-week self-ban on themselves from posting in this thread only but not for other threads
starting on the day and time of the conviction.
The only stipulation is that it is a no-bet either way if he is not the nominee for whatever reason when the conviction is rendered.
This proposed wager expires at 11;59 PM tonight Eastern time."
Back sometime after 10.
I don't expect anyone to accept it because as usual the persons to whom it is directed are all mouth and can talk the talk but not back it
up by walking the walk!!
"Since it looks like it could be an important week regarding a possible ruling of the SCOTUS and maybe some other court regarding
what could happen, I am offering a proposed wager to Lenny or anyone who cares to take it, that is good for the first taker only.
My proposed bet is that before the 2024 Election Trump is going to be convicted in at least one of the indictments.
Whoever loses imposes a two-week self-ban on themselves from posting in this thread only but not for other threads
starting on the day and time of the conviction.
The only stipulation is that it is a no-bet either way if he is not the nominee for whatever reason when the conviction is rendered.
This proposed wager expires at 11;59 PM tonight Eastern time."
Back sometime after 10.
I can finally agree on one thing with Ann Coulter.
www.alternet.org
I think he should do it.
'Die': Ann Coulter delivers brutal assessment on how Trump can help 'take America back'
Conservative firebrand Ann Coulter on Monday shared her opinion on what Donald Trump “needs to do” to help conservatives “take America back”: “Die.”The right-wing commentator and In Trump We Trust: E Pluribus Awesome! author, who endorsed the former president in 2016, gave her assessment on X in...
www.alternet.org
I think he should do it.
Funny how the greatest minds always agree with us.
Listen carefully
More proof Donald Trump is 100% aligned with God while Satan's minions stand absolutely no chance in this war.
#GodWon
Remember when the op warned about AI and CBDCs at the onset of the original RR thread, and continued to warn about them throughout?
So you are saying the op was RIGHT AGAIN?
I am done a little earlier, so here we go.
First of all, I take back in this instance anyway about not walking the walk as you did accept the bet with conditions.
I am not sure we will agree with my conditions and if not and/or you can't suggest an alternative condition with which
I agree with but here goes:
I will accept your end of the bet about Trump's being the nominee on Election Day if he is the nominee on that rather than
his just receiving the nomination at the Republican Convention in July.
If he is not the nominee on that date, then not only is your end of the bet canceled but mine is also unless you declare
that my end of the bet is still in effect.
Assuming that we agree to the conditions and that Trump is the nominee on Election day, here are two more conditions that are not
mandatory but I am suggesting.
Basically what I am proposing that if either one of us goes 2-0(the other person goes 0-2), the penalty will be a 2 week suspension
on;y rather than four weeks(two for each win/loss).
If we go 1-1, eg Trump is the nominee on Election Day but is also convicted by that date, it is a no-bet;if Trump is not
the nominee on that date but is also not convicted, it is also a no-bet.
I pretty much stated the same earlier on the post but here I just explained
That's pretty much it.
If you have another proposal, please post them.
If we can't agree on the terms, well, hey that's life, and on my end, no hard feelings.
All these health problems are surely unfortunate for TheRoyalFamily
this sick group of Satanic Pedos.....
I WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY AND THEIR HEALTH This family has faced an unprecedented confluence of "bad luck" relating to health. It could of course all be completely random But can we ask the question... Has Covid vaccination impacted this family in the way it has so many others? The British royal family used their influence to encourage the UK population to step up and take Covid vaccinations. The Queen and Prince Phillip received their first doses in January 2021. The second dose would almost certainly have been 3 weeks later.
By mid February 2021 Prince Phillip was hospitalised for a "non covid infection"...and for some form of HEART SURGERY. In April 2021 Prince Phillip died. Official cause of death "old age". On September 8th 2022 the Queen of England died, following a very visible decline in health over the preceding months. Her frailty increased rapidly, and her mobility declined. The Queen's official cause of death "old age"...although a Royal Biographer wrote a book claiming that she was battling BONE MARROW CANCER.
The Duchess of York (Fergie) has recently had a mastectomy following the discovery of BREAST CANCER. At the time of her surgery, moles were also removed. She has now been diagnosed with MELANOMA also. Princess Catherine, the future Queen of England, has recently been hospitalised for "ABDOMINAL SURGERY". Details remain confidential, but clearly whatever ails her is very significant. She spent two weeks in hospital and is expecting a three month recovery. And today.... We learn that the King of England, Charles, has been diagnosed with CANCER. He recently underwent an operation for an enlarged prostate, but we are told it is not prostate cancer.
At a time when cancer rates are soaring, and it is now clear that mrna suppresses cancer suppressor genes... It's not heresy to ask intelligent questions about the "bad luck" that has befallen this high visibility family
this sick group of Satanic Pedos.....
I WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY AND THEIR HEALTH This family has faced an unprecedented confluence of "bad luck" relating to health. It could of course all be completely random But can we ask the question... Has Covid vaccination impacted this family in the way it has so many others? The British royal family used their influence to encourage the UK population to step up and take Covid vaccinations. The Queen and Prince Phillip received their first doses in January 2021. The second dose would almost certainly have been 3 weeks later.
By mid February 2021 Prince Phillip was hospitalised for a "non covid infection"...and for some form of HEART SURGERY. In April 2021 Prince Phillip died. Official cause of death "old age". On September 8th 2022 the Queen of England died, following a very visible decline in health over the preceding months. Her frailty increased rapidly, and her mobility declined. The Queen's official cause of death "old age"...although a Royal Biographer wrote a book claiming that she was battling BONE MARROW CANCER.
The Duchess of York (Fergie) has recently had a mastectomy following the discovery of BREAST CANCER. At the time of her surgery, moles were also removed. She has now been diagnosed with MELANOMA also. Princess Catherine, the future Queen of England, has recently been hospitalised for "ABDOMINAL SURGERY". Details remain confidential, but clearly whatever ails her is very significant. She spent two weeks in hospital and is expecting a three month recovery. And today.... We learn that the King of England, Charles, has been diagnosed with CANCER. He recently underwent an operation for an enlarged prostate, but we are told it is not prostate cancer.
At a time when cancer rates are soaring, and it is now clear that mrna suppresses cancer suppressor genes... It's not heresy to ask intelligent questions about the "bad luck" that has befallen this high visibility family
You and/or your source don't know sh it about statistics and sampling techniques because if you did you/they would realize
that to draw any conclusions from Prince Charles and the Royal Family you would have to have a much larger sample
size as well as to compare the findings with sampling done for starters with similar characteristics such as with folks and familes with
similar backgrounds, etc. and to compare how many of these individuals and families have been vaccinated for
Covid suffered similar fates with the Royal Family to be able to decide if any conclusions can be derived
that are both valid and reliable!!
If not, what you state makes as much sense as saying that because someone famous like Kobe Bryant and his daughter were
killed in a helicopter crash a few years ago, one should conclude that one should avoid flying in helicopters and for that
matters flight in general!!
ps Not to brag, but having a strong college minor in statistics, I know what the fu ck I am talking about when it comes to stuff like this!!
"KING CHARLES" HAS "CANCER" AT SAME TIME CANCER "VACCINE" TRIALS START IN UKAnyone who actually believes a vaccine will cure cancer is beyond stupid.
It's an mRNA vaxx just like the deadly covid shot.
It has NOTHING to do with "curing cancer".
It's virtually the same "covid" vaxx being presented under a different guise.
And it's just paving the way to kill more people and control the rest through AI frequencies.
better job at being competent and effective than Biden (32%). In 2020, Biden had a 9-point advantage on this measure (47% to 38%)
37% - Biden's job rating is the lowest of his presidency and the lowest for any president in NBC Poll since G.W. Bush second term. (Trump's low was 39%) —
Don‘t worry JAGOFF will stop this
Biden in a blowout
immiment
Soon, real soon .
A very good read.
www.yahoo.com
The comments are awesome!
Imminent
Fraud
Rapist
Grifter
Donald Trump’s Awkward Verbal Stumble Has His Critics On A Roll
The former president’s latest gaffe led to a quick reminder of one of his administration’s biggest failures.
The comments are awesome!
Imminent
Fraud
Rapist
Grifter
I remember dwac was by far your smallest holding when it was down.
Implying it is a big holding now doesn't fly unless you can provide a post showing then that changed.
The bigger question is how much you have of any stock a a person who hasn't been employed for at least east the last four years
since you started the original thread!!
Hmm-all from the same person/YOU who claims that there has been a cure for ALL kinds of cancer for well over but has somehow
View attachment 83357
Anyone who actually believes a vaccine will cure cancer is beyond stupid.
It's an mRNA vaxx just like the deadly covid shot.
It has NOTHING to do with "curing cancer".
It's virtually the same "covid" vaxx being presented under a different guise.
And it's just paving the way to kill more people and control the rest through AI frequencies.
been kept secret by all of the doctors who know about it, the patients who have been cured, the media, etc. for all of these years,
but that somehow you are one of the selected few who know about it-yeah right!! lol
And oh yes you also claim because of some natural herbs that only you and another few select folks know about, and I am quoting,
you HAVE NEVER BEEN SICK FOR ONE DAY IN YOUR ENTIRE LIFE INCLUDING A COMMON COLD!!
Can you say "sbd the pathological liar," who every day tries to emulate a fellow pathological liar, Donald Trump!!
somehow you are one of the "privileged: folks
I am reposting this from late last night and am extending the deadline to 11;59 tonight.
If Lenny and/or anyone else doesn't accept the terms of the bet and/or suggests an alternative, it is a no-bet and again I commend
Lenny for at least responding to it even if we can't agree on the terms.
First of all, I take back in this instance anyway about not walking the walk as you did accept the bet with conditions.
I am not sure we will agree with my conditions and if not and/or you can't suggest an alternative condition with which
I agree with but here goes:
I will accept your end of the bet about Trump's being the nominee on Election Day if he is the nominee on that rather than
his just receiving the nomination at the Republican Convention in July.
If he is not the nominee on that date, then not only is your end of the bet canceled but mine is also unless you declare
that my end of the bet is still in effect.
Assuming that we agree to the conditions and that Trump is the nominee on Election day, here are two more conditions that are not
mandatory but I am suggesting.
Basically what I am proposing that if either one of us goes 2-0(the other person goes 0-2), the penalty will be a 2 week suspension
on;y rather than four weeks(two for each win/loss).
If we go 1-1, eg Trump is the nominee on Election Day but is also convicted by that date, it is a no-bet;if Trump is not
the nominee on that date but is also not convicted, it is also a no-bet.
I pretty much stated the same earlier on the post but here I just explained
That's pretty much it.
If you have another proposal, please post them.
If we can't agree on the terms, well, hey that's life, and on my end, no hard feelings.
If Lenny and/or anyone else doesn't accept the terms of the bet and/or suggests an alternative, it is a no-bet and again I commend
Lenny for at least responding to it even if we can't agree on the terms.
I am done a little earlier, so here we go.
First of all, I take back in this instance anyway about not walking the walk as you did accept the bet with conditions.
I am not sure we will agree with my conditions and if not and/or you can't suggest an alternative condition with which
I agree with but here goes:
I will accept your end of the bet about Trump's being the nominee on Election Day if he is the nominee on that rather than
his just receiving the nomination at the Republican Convention in July.
If he is not the nominee on that date, then not only is your end of the bet canceled but mine is also unless you declare
that my end of the bet is still in effect.
Assuming that we agree to the conditions and that Trump is the nominee on Election day, here are two more conditions that are not
mandatory but I am suggesting.
Basically what I am proposing that if either one of us goes 2-0(the other person goes 0-2), the penalty will be a 2 week suspension
on;y rather than four weeks(two for each win/loss).
If we go 1-1, eg Trump is the nominee on Election Day but is also convicted by that date, it is a no-bet;if Trump is not
the nominee on that date but is also not convicted, it is also a no-bet.
I pretty much stated the same earlier on the post but here I just explained
That's pretty much it.
If you have another proposal, please post them.
If we can't agree on the terms, well, hey that's life, and on my end, no hard feelings.
