To be clear, imo and as many others have said, the reason that Jack Smith did not formally charge Trump with trying to incite
an insurrection on January 6th was/is that he wanted to focus on/streamline his focus of emphasis on charging Trump
with trying to overturn the results of the 2020 Election and subvert the Constitution rather than dilute his argument!!
Imo to conclude otherwise and state that he didn't have enough evidence is wishful thinking, illogical, baseless and in addition amounts to
begging the question and poisoning the well!!
1) To be clear . Jack has Jack shit for evidence to charge Trump for inciting an insurrection .
2)He so clearly subverted the Constitution trying to change the results of the election they had to change the Electoral Count Act .