From
www.RealNewsandHistory.com
A little over one year has passed since the White Hats -- using both the identity and the ill-gotten money of the probably deceased Globalist villain Elon Musk -- concluded the process of purchasing Deep State Twitter for $44 billion.
Over the course of the past year, the imposter "Elon Musk" has done his best to drive the value of his acquired asset into the ground -- including such detrimental acts as the bizarre rebranding of the company as "X," and the deliberate picking of bad-for-business political fights with the (((usual suspects))) as well as Demonrats in general.
The plummeting value of X currently stands at $20 billion and -- in the aftermath of his endorsement of "far right conspiracy theories;" his shocking amplification of an "antisemitic" post blaming Jews for anti-White hatred and the subsequent advertiser boycotts -- is expected to lose even more value. "Musk" -- while
publicly acknowledging the fact that the boycotts could end up killing his company -- seems unperturbed by it all. In response to a question about advertiser boycotts, (Disney being the most prominent) he said, before an audience, that anyone who wants to boycott X can: "Go F*** yourself."
Is "Musk" trying to wreck Twitter / X from within? We now suspect that to be his assigned mission. But why would he want to do such a thing? Who benefits? We'll get to that.
In math, statistics and certain types of coding, the variable "X" is used as a temporary "placeholder." Might this mean that some other entity will, in due time, takeover X?
What's Musk's end game?
"Musk's" latest nemesis is Disney CEO Bob Iger (cough cough) who was supposedly in the audience when Musk dropped the F Bomb directed at Disney (which owns ABC). We say "supposedly" because we have reason to believe that Bob Iger -- who had strangely resigned from Disney but just as strangely returned less than two years later -- may actually be "Bob Iger."
The interesting thing about the mutually destructive boycott war between the two titans is that Iger, like Musk and like Twitters' prior CEO, Jack Dorsey -- was also specifically targeted, years ago, by Q, at a time when nobody could have foreseen this ongoing drama. Here's what Q (post 3883, February 25, 2021) had to say about Iger's unexpected 2020 "resignation" as Disney CEO:
"Iger didn't quit Disney" --- "The Secret War continues." - Q
Iger's (or "Iger's) Disney and Disney X streaming service are, like Musk's X, also imploding. Disney stock is down 32% from its 2021 high. Some of that is market-related, of course -- but a well-organized and expanding right wing boycott (now being enhanced by Musk) -- is contributing to the hemorrhaging of Disney + streaming subscriptions.
If "Musk" and "Iger" keep beating each other up the way they are, then pretty soon, X and Disney+ may both be available for media competitors to buy up on the cheap. Is there a Divide and Conquer operation at work here?
https://www.realnewsandhistory.com/bookspdfs/
NEWSWEEK
USA TODAY
CNN
A mutually destructive ("Divide & Conquer) war between the "world's richest man" and the various tech / media giants boycotting him (Disney, Apple, Facebook et al) will benefit the unknown party which is ochestrating the multi-party battle.
That the financial troubles being experienced by Twitter / X and Disney+ have been engineered by the White Hats is quite obvious to "The Editorial Board" of The Anti-New York Times. No speculation there, boys and girls. Therefore, there has to be an end game / final scene for the scripted "Musk" drama.
The following, however, is only a hypothesis. Don't hold us to it --- and do not take this as investment advice! X has an up-and-coming social media competitor which has announced its intentions to achieve a much higher market share as soon as its expected merger with Digital World Acquistion Corporation (DWAC) and associated major funding are consummated. That would be Truth Social, part of the Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG).
Disney+ also has a new competitor on the horizon -- a streaming service called TMTG+, which is also part of Trump's promised TMTG media juggernaut. The stated mission for TMTG+ will be to produce "non-woke" subscription-based clean content --- the opposite of what "Frankfurt School" degenerate Disney+ pumps out.
What if the plan all along was to sabotage Twitter and Disney+ -- pit them into a boycott war against each other -- and tank their stock prices in advance of TMTG acquiring them both? DWAC, after all, stands for Digital World Acquisition Corp.
Keep an eye on this "Musk" vs "Iger" war.
* Full disclosure (not advice!): "The Editorial Board" purchased shares of DWAC two years ago. DWAC shares will convert to TMTG shares after the merger happens sometime in 2024. At which time, according to CEO Devon Nunes, TMTG will use the funding to embark on a major expansion program.
What if Truth Social acquires Twitter / X and TMTG + acquires Disney + and TMTG News acquires CNN? The would certainly be a "GIANT VOICE" for the people.
Just two days before Twitter (on Trump's orders) banned Trump's account -- he hinted that we would have a GIANT VOICE in the future. Is that what his multi-media company, TMTG is destined for?
