My edits were deemed too biased politically!!! Considering I've never introduced a source (non sports only. I've introduced sources for sports edits) it's total BS! Case in point, Jill Harth the only women to accuse Trump of sexual misconduct before the R came after his name, "Settled a lawsuit with Trump." That's how the wiki page read. Yet in her interview, which was/is cited in the wiki page, she said, "her boyfriend settled a business lawsuit with Trump." So they conveniently left out boyfriend and business!! They also conveniently left out the fact that she would go on to date Trump a year or so later. I edited the page to include the entire quote/story. it stayed for awhile, after 2016 they changed it and deemed my edits (numerous examples, DNC hack they leave out the fact the the FBI was not allowed to investigate the servers according to the cited sources etc etc... ) too politically biased!! I argued how can it be biased if I'm using the cited sources? I was just including the whole picture arguing we must include the whole story and let the readers decide, but to no avail.
Thanks for clarifying w-thumbs!^ it's tough when someone can ban you from a website for any reason & u can't fight back . I'm into rose breeding & I was banned from a forum because I mentioned a rose that the moderator deemed " offensive " because I used the word CONFEDERATE in my post - I was banned without the mod even reading my post .... She saw the word CONFEDERATE & just banned me , outrageous .
The question is did you read it......MSM sheep ,gonna MSM sheep.....
Gotta love a guy that doesnt even understand what he reads criticize a link. Try reading it again pal and back with us. Now keep in mind they worded it to trick simpletons like yourself, so read it slowly this time and figure out how many were vaxed and how many were not. No hard feelings, glad to help you.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-58680204
Accept truth In your own time Whopper Chopper, in your own time.:toast:
What I'm saying is that the world was in lockdown during 2020. Hence there will be a more limited spread of the disease
The world is open in 2021. Just opening up is going to create a surge.
That's where I stand in the middle of both worlds. The Fauci crowd says the increases prove we need to shut down. The antivaxers say the increase proves the vaccine is not working. I think both sides are wrong.
Of course we're having a surge, we know that's going to happen. And yes the vaccine is working, that's what's making the increases possible and palatable
The world is open in 2021. Just opening up is going to create a surge.
That's where I stand in the middle of both worlds. The Fauci crowd says the increases prove we need to shut down. The antivaxers say the increase proves the vaccine is not working. I think both sides are wrong.
Of course we're having a surge, we know that's going to happen. And yes the vaccine is working, that's what's making the increases possible and palatable
Ha , his continued use of the term "antivaxers" is pretty dishonest, I dont oppose proven vaxes...but I do oppose untested/barely tested mRNA gene therapy, especially when I see how many are being injured combined with how inneffective it is combined with Tyrannical goverments trying to force them on their citizens combined with media censoring doctors and scientist who give an opposing view while villifying safe and proven treatements like Ivermectin and HCQ.
Put all that shit together and its pretty obvious to those paying attention that this has almost nothing to do with health and pretty much everything to do about control......and Im not even getting to the REAL nefarious shit yetShush()*
I dont know how many will have to die unncessarily before people wake up?
Gotta love the Babylon Bee
CDC Reminds People To Listen To All Medical Professionals Except For The Tens Of Thousands Who Refused The Vaccine
WASHINGTON, D.C.—The CDC today issued a reminder for Americans to trust healthcare professionals when learning about the vaccine—except if said doctor disagrees with the government, in which case he should be ignored and fired.
"When we are trying to understand all the pros and cons of a brand new vaccine, the one absolute must is total groupthink," said CDC Director Rachel Walensky. "We cannot allow any sort of healthy dissension, especially from highly trained healthcare providers, to help guide us."
The administration has promised to make it easy to recognize unvaccinated medical professionals by ensuring they are unemployed. If one of these out-of-work doctors attempts to talk about the vaccine, the CDC has recommended citizens place their fingers in their ears and begin singing 'Baby Shark'.
"It's hard to even put into words how stupid the CDC is," said a local doctor who also writes for a satire site and must remain anonymous. "I have natural immunity because I kept taking care of patients when this pandemic hit. My entire family became really ill, but those were the risks we had to take. Now hear me: the vaccine is a medical marvel. It has saved many lives, it has allowed my elderly patients to resume living—I am very grateful for it. Yet while the vaccine is very safe, it is not a zero-risk intervention. Real, significant adverse events can occur, although rarely. So for someone with natural immunity—which the latest data shows to be seven times stronger than vaccination—there is simply no reason they should be compelled into vaccination and take on that risk of an adverse event. Same with children, given their low-risk profile for serious disease, and the need for longer studies to determine potential adverse effects.
The broad mandate for everyone to get vaccinated, regardless of natural immunity status, is egregiously anti-science."
The CDC has asked anyone who read the previous paragraph to please smack their heads into a wall until they forget everything they just read. Drones have been dispatched to take care of that silly doctor, who is probably hiding in Brazil.
CDC Reminds People To Listen To All Medical Professionals Except For The Tens Of Thousands Who Refused The Vaccine
WASHINGTON, D.C.—The CDC today issued a reminder for Americans to trust healthcare professionals when learning about the vaccine—except if said doctor disagrees with the government, in which case he should be ignored and fired.
"When we are trying to understand all the pros and cons of a brand new vaccine, the one absolute must is total groupthink," said CDC Director Rachel Walensky. "We cannot allow any sort of healthy dissension, especially from highly trained healthcare providers, to help guide us."
The administration has promised to make it easy to recognize unvaccinated medical professionals by ensuring they are unemployed. If one of these out-of-work doctors attempts to talk about the vaccine, the CDC has recommended citizens place their fingers in their ears and begin singing 'Baby Shark'.
"It's hard to even put into words how stupid the CDC is," said a local doctor who also writes for a satire site and must remain anonymous. "I have natural immunity because I kept taking care of patients when this pandemic hit. My entire family became really ill, but those were the risks we had to take. Now hear me: the vaccine is a medical marvel. It has saved many lives, it has allowed my elderly patients to resume living—I am very grateful for it. Yet while the vaccine is very safe, it is not a zero-risk intervention. Real, significant adverse events can occur, although rarely. So for someone with natural immunity—which the latest data shows to be seven times stronger than vaccination—there is simply no reason they should be compelled into vaccination and take on that risk of an adverse event. Same with children, given their low-risk profile for serious disease, and the need for longer studies to determine potential adverse effects.
The broad mandate for everyone to get vaccinated, regardless of natural immunity status, is egregiously anti-science."
The CDC has asked anyone who read the previous paragraph to please smack their heads into a wall until they forget everything they just read. Drones have been dispatched to take care of that silly doctor, who is probably hiding in Brazil.
These so-called "vaccines" have killed more people in a year than all other vaccines in history COMBINED using the CDC's own numbers, which we know are a total fraud. In years past, a dozen or so deaths would have been enough to pull them off the market. Not now. Those numbers are much higher and in the coming years we'll see skyrocketing auto immune diseases, cancers, heart failures and what not.
Coupled with the fact Covid cases, hospitalizations and deaths are skyrocketing in the most "ulta-vaxxed" areas on the planet (Israel now on its FOURTH booster, with no end in sight) it's hard to believe a vaccine being much worse.
Of course doctors aren't "in on" the scam, they simply follow hospital guidelines and can only provide their patients with information disclosed by these drug companies, which sadly don't have a very good track record of transparency and honesty.
All this for a virus with a 99.6% survival rate. Why would any rational individual even entertain this experimental jab?
Coupled with the fact Covid cases, hospitalizations and deaths are skyrocketing in the most "ulta-vaxxed" areas on the planet (Israel now on its FOURTH booster, with no end in sight) it's hard to believe a vaccine being much worse.
Of course doctors aren't "in on" the scam, they simply follow hospital guidelines and can only provide their patients with information disclosed by these drug companies, which sadly don't have a very good track record of transparency and honesty.
All this for a virus with a 99.6% survival rate. Why would any rational individual even entertain this experimental jab?
I can see fine, I can think even more, and I'm sorry it's so damn easy to raise mitigating circumstances
I don’t buy and sell superficial bullshit. My standard for evidence is much much much higher
