Acebb is by far the dumbest make believe lawyer I have ever met. The kid struggles with some of the most basic concepts out there. He can't grasp what liquidate means, he had trouble with what "sold" means, fails at basic math, can't figure out what scientists mean by "very likely", now he thinks a policy has to be written down?? Hahahaha. There is no chance he is a lawyer if he thinks policies have to be written. 0% chance. Absolute comedy gold!!
In the DoD AK, policies are on paper and published or they don't exist. They are called "policy letters," "publications," or "instructions." Supervisors at all levels always ask first "what does the publication say?" when talking about matters of contention or disagreement. These instructions provide clarity and remove ambiguity from the equation.
Um, since America left POW's behind in Korea and Vietnam, when was this policy you're saying exists put into place and who implemented it? Additionally, how can a policy be enacted when it is not written down?
Oh wait, policies do have to be written down, idiot. But of course you have no actual experience in the military or real world so you'll just make shit up. See dum-dum, policies flow from statute or regulations and thus are recorded. If something isn't written down it is not a policy.
You are so fucking dumb it is embarrassing.
Yes sir!
DoD Forms Management Web site uses all the terms that our man on active duty says they do.
But we will listen to the fat shut who lives in the middle of nowhere instead.
LMFAO
You're literally the dumbest lawyer in history, lol. Policies can be broken, they don't have to be put in place or written down. We have a policy of not negotiating with terrorists, yet it's not written down anywhere. You're confusing the ability to enforce policies versus what a policy actually is... something no lawyer would ever do. It's hilarious how dumb you are, hahaha.
Of course we do, haha. We've had the policy of not negotiating with terrorists for long before you were born. It's hilarious how dumb you are.
“This Administration has an obligation under the law to work with Congress on issues that relate to our national security,” said Congressman Barrow. “The President failed to notify Congress of his intent to transfer five high priority detainees from Guantanamo Bay, and more importantly, he abandoned our long-standing policy of not negotiating with terrorists. This transfer poses a major national security risk, and it complicates our efforts to combat terrorism worldwide. The President cannot treat Congress as an afterthought or adversary, particularly with decisions impacting our national security and especially since, in this case, Congress could have helped the President get this decision right.”
http://rigell.house.gov/news/email/show.aspx?ID=JYFGL5X43Y4DKQSZT5GJNEZGIU
Since you have never been in the military, how would you know what a military policy is?
Oh, you have no actual experience in the military or real world so you'll just make shit up. See dum-dum, policies flow from statute or regulations and thus are recorded. If something isn't written down it is not a policy.
I'm sorry guy but you can't have unwritten policies. That leads to ambiguity and that's not what policy is.
We don't negotiate with terrorists is not a policy or Bergdahl would still be sitting in a mud hut in Afghanistan. Policies are guidelines written down, signed and published by supervisors at all levels so the organizations know what the standards are.
There's always unwritten policies. In the government/military you don't want them and they are hard to enforce if they aren't explicitly written, but they do exist and it's not impossible for unwritten policies to exist as our resident all-star lawyer Acebb claims. Do not negotiate with terrorists is a perfect example of an unwritten policy that the government tries to abide by.
