So are you finished talking out of your ass yet or would like to continue? The fact that you're simply basing your criteria off your own perception of popular players hardly demonstrates that you even know what you're talking about. Why not actually take a look at some stats and evaluate a player's body of work before you blow them off completely? Although Boozer doesn't get all the accolades and attention in comparison to Deron Williams or Derrick Rose, it doesn't mean that you can negate his contribution either.
The fact of the matter is, his career/season stats are comparable to Nash, Kidd, and Parker. He also grabs boards, gets points, can shoot FTs, doesn't cause drama in the locker room, or get injured very often. So what would you say keeps him out of contention from being inducted in the future? Because he doesn't "dominate" a game or get very far in the postseason? Honestly now, when was the last time you've seen Kidd, or Ray Allen take over a game? When was the last time Nash was even a contender to win the Western Conference?
Career: 17.0 ppg, 9.9 reb. 1.9 ast
Season:15.1 ppg, 8.7 reb. 2.4 ast
oh and.. Parker over Ginobili.
