I have no clue what Zaga team you are watching. Sabonis and Karnowski will get absolutely dominated by Kentucky's bigs. Hell, they couldn't even stop Waldo down low. I think Kentucky beats them by 30+, but I wouldn't bet that high of a number with out serious odds. If you want to talk about scrub ass teams, look at Gonzagas schedule.
If Waldo played in the SEC, he quite possibly would be the best offensive C in the conference.
I personally think Arizona can beat KY, along with Wisconsin.
This KY team is not UNLV from 1990, they wish they had half their athleticism.
That's debatable... Jarrell Martin would give him a run for his money. And Jarrell Martin is actually athletic enough to get shots off against NBA level bigs. Towns, Cauley-Stein, and Johnson would make life hell for for Waldow. They definitely aren't Karnowski and Sabonis with 4 inch verts out there.
Have you seen Gonzaga play? Karnowski and Sabonis are a good 1-2 punch.
Arizona doesn't have length?
Do you think UVA is one of the best defenses in the history of the game too?
You realize Gonzaga blew a road win earlier this year against Arizona, right?
And UVA has every bit as good a defense as Kentucky statistically, so basically your whole premise is the eye test. It's not as if UK's front line totally shut down UNC or LSU's front line. Granted Gonzaga's front lines aren't as athletic than those 2, but they also have much better perimeter shooting than either of those teams and the ability to space the floor.
Yea, I watched that game against Arizona. Arizona has struggled against a lot of teams this year, a lot of pretty bad teams. I wouldn't necessarily count that as a reason Gonzaga could compete with Kentucky. I would take Kansas over Arizona any day of the week and we all saw what Kentucky did to Kansas. That right there is dominance. Arizona, Gonzaga, and Kentucky have one common opponent and that is UCLA. What Kentucky did to UCLA was absolute destruction of a semi good team with semi good front 2. Something Gonzaga or Arizona could never do to a team like UCLA.
As for defense the only thing Virginia has over Kentucky is points, but like I said they play a style where they aren't going to give up many points. Kentucky is #2 in blocks, #1 FG%, #4 3pt FG%, . Virginia isn't even in the top 50 in blocks. Kentucky has given up more than 140+ shots than Virginia has. It all comes down to tempo with Virginia's D. Kentucky is a force inside and probably the best or at least top 3 defense in the history of the game.
Why does it matter when it was played? That's the level of intensity you are going to get out of them come tourney time.