What the guessers of the world need to understand is that once a dot is connected it cannot be disconnected simply for convenience. It is very convenient to admit that these three guys were more than just names from the past and that they had little or no influence on him. Obama even made a statement that guesser quoted downplaying his relationship with Rashid Khalidi. That is something you do when you are on the defensive. Khalidi is not involved in Obama’s life according to Obama and guesser but consider this:
Khalidi is longtime a friend of Barack Obama and Michelle Obama. In the 1990s, Obama and his wife were regular dinner guests at Khalidi's Chicago home. During the 2000 election cycle, Mr. and Mrs. Khalidi organized a fundraiser for Barack Obama's unsuccessful congressional bid. In 2001 and again in 2002, the Woods Fund of Chicago, while Mr. Obama served on its board, made grants totaling $75,000 to Khalidi's Arab American Action Network. In 2003 Obama would attend a farewell party in Khalidi's honor when the latter was leaving the University of Chicago to embark on his new position at Columbia.
In a 2008 interview, Khalidi praised Obama effusively, stating that, if elected President, Obama would be more understanding of the Palestinian experience than other politicians. "He has family literally all over the world," Khalidi noted. "I feel a kindred spirit from that."
So what do you think based on what is going on in Israel right now. Wouldn’t you say that Obama is “more understanding of the Palestinian experience” than is he of the Israeli experience. Actions speak much louder than words. Could that be why Fox says you be the judge. Have you ever heard that from the mouth of a liberal. Right.
Khalidi is longtime a friend of Barack Obama and Michelle Obama. In the 1990s, Obama and his wife were regular dinner guests at Khalidi's Chicago home. During the 2000 election cycle, Mr. and Mrs. Khalidi organized a fundraiser for Barack Obama's unsuccessful congressional bid. In 2001 and again in 2002, the Woods Fund of Chicago, while Mr. Obama served on its board, made grants totaling $75,000 to Khalidi's Arab American Action Network. In 2003 Obama would attend a farewell party in Khalidi's honor when the latter was leaving the University of Chicago to embark on his new position at Columbia.
In a 2008 interview, Khalidi praised Obama effusively, stating that, if elected President, Obama would be more understanding of the Palestinian experience than other politicians. "He has family literally all over the world," Khalidi noted. "I feel a kindred spirit from that."
So what do you think based on what is going on in Israel right now. Wouldn’t you say that Obama is “more understanding of the Palestinian experience” than is he of the Israeli experience. Actions speak much louder than words. Could that be why Fox says you be the judge. Have you ever heard that from the mouth of a liberal. Right.
Exactly. But guesser has tried unsuccessfully to sell himself as an independent and someone who checked out Obama before he voted for him. I assure you he never connected any dots he did what he always does looked for what fitshis point of view. God forbid people like us are fiscal conservatives and have connected dots on Obama. He dropped crumbs all along the way and they couldn't hide them all.
uke1:The Guesser is like a pesky little ankle biter. Does a lot of yappin and not much else. Like most Liberals he’s been conditioned, brainwash if you will, to accept without reflux.
Obama has been given a pass his entire life. It’s almost like he’s some biblical profit when in actuality he’s nothing more than a carnie barker. He is a great orator when he has a teleprompter but without his blankie, not so much.
His record as president speaks for itself. He is the all time champion of failure.
Yet with all the glaring proof of his incompetence, he was elected to a 2nd term. The reality of that happening is mind boggling and exposes the majority of the citizens of our country.
I keep telling everyone, you can’t fix stupid.
ah so this is what all rubbish up in rubber room about is in here. As always i learned when lil girl never argue about politics or religion with anyone.
And sure enough i stayed away from the endless argumaents about conserves , libs, dems, and gop's Religion? never even thought about arguing with anyone. Stop-SS-- Hug it out guys you'll be better off in long run....YOU can continue arguing like this until the day you die and never change anyones mind.
And sure enough i stayed away from the endless argumaents about conserves , libs, dems, and gop's Religion? never even thought about arguing with anyone. Stop-SS-- Hug it out guys you'll be better off in long run....YOU can continue arguing like this until the day you die and never change anyones mind.
Dave: No you can't fix stupid and it also dispells the saying that ignorance is bliss. I can understand the uninformed voting for Obama but when guesser said he looked into his past before voting for him that was a big windy. I did not even do that until around 2009 when I took a good look around and saw what he was up to. Digging into his past for me was an after tought, too little too late but I have the peace of mind of knowing where he is really coming from. Guys like AK and guesser just don't get it. They are sheep through and through. Everyday there is something new that exposes this regime for what it is and it all points to Obama. Anyone who has looked into his past like us know better. Connecting dots is easy and they are there for all to see when it comes to Obama. Anyone who has looked into Obama's past can also find dead ends and hurdles that have been provided by those who protect Obama. But after a while it simply adds up and Obama's agenda is exposed as the Hope and Change that all of his mentors and associates have always been in pursuit of. The results of their pursuit is personified in Benghazi, the IRS scandal, Fast and Furious, the VA Hospital problems, the border, the Ukraine, Israel, on and on. You mentioned band aids, that is the extent of their ability to fix anything.
I can understand their inability to not fix problems but what I don’t understand is why they insist on fixing things that aren’t broken.
The Earth and healthcare are two glaring examples.
Ugh! fossil fuel bad, green energy good. So let’s put the coal industry out of business and the jobs that go along with it, restrict oil drilling on government land and the jobs it would create and blow trillions of dollars on green energy companies so they can ultimately go bankrupt. With all that’s going on in the world, energy independence should be a top priority for the country but no, fund raising tops the list.
Then let’s take the best healthcare mankind has know, make it more expensive, restrict doctors and hospitals, under the false pretence that 30 million more will have health coverage only to have the CBO conclude by the year 2024, 31 million will still be uninsured. Brilliant I tell you, just fucking brilliant.
It’s a really, really good thing there are term limits on the presidency. No one, no matter how incompetent he/she may be, no matter how radical the ideology may be, no one person can destroy the U.S. in eight years.
And Obama is the proof.
anything about such posts seem a tad bit ironic to you? just saying
I ran across an article that placed Obama at an anti-Israel event held in LA where he delivered “a glowing testimonial” for Rashid Khaladi (his Palestenian friend I referenced earlier). That article also alluded to the claim that the LA Times had a video tape of that event and that they were not going to release it. That did not sound right, why would a newspaper protect everyone involved in an event that took place in 2003. Some on the left would probably say that it was not about Obama that was too early in his political career. Others might say, why would they not release the tape…period (sorry I borrowed that from Obama). Well it came up in 2008 and the LA time according to reports said they were still not releasing that tape. Well at that time it was obvious why….the election. The times said they could not release it because the source that furnished it who made not releasing the tape as a condition upon giving them the tape. Ok. Makes you wonder about this a little more and about the LA Times in particular. Then I came across this article today and it really got me to thinking. What do you think.
L.A. Times Prints Front-Page Defense of Hamas Terror Against Israel
Email ArticlePrint article Send a Tip
by Joel B. Pollak 24 Jul 2014, 5:37 AM PDT157post a comment
The Los Angeles Times leads Thursday with a story entitled: "Gaza's dilemma: Deadly war or suffocating Israeli embargo." According to the story, Palestinians in Gaza are left with no choice but to wage war, because if they do not fire rockets at Israeli civilians, they must accept an Israeli [sic] "embargo." The article omits the obvious point that if Hamas would stop trying to kill Israelis, neither the embargo nor the war itself would be necessary.
The authors, Alexandra Zavis and Batsheva Sobelman, accept that Hamas started the war--and even suggest that most Palestinians in Gaza support it, though there is nothing beyond anecdotal evidence to prove that claim. They also describe Hamas's smuggling tunnels to Egypt--which have been used to import deadly weapons--in positive terms, lamenting their supposed closure: "Residents are left to struggle just to get by."
Nowhere--not once--in the entire article do Zavis or Sobelman note the terror tunnels that Hamas has spent the past several years building to attack Israel, diverting humanitarian aid and building materials for that purpose. Nowhere do they mention the fact that Hamas is using Palestinians as human shields, or that Israel has offered many ceasefires, or that the rockets fired from Gaza are intended to kill as many Israeli civilians as possible.
The article presents "war" or "embargo" as a false choice for Palestinians, utterly ignoring the fact that Gazans could choose peace instead of either of those options. The authors faithfully report the skepticism of Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal towards a ceasefire, as if he is a reliable source and his reservations are justified.
In sum, the article is nothing short of pro-terror propaganda, in other words, presented to readers as front-page news.
Image: Newseum
L.A. Times Prints Front-Page Defense of Hamas Terror Against Israel
by Joel B. Pollak 24 Jul 2014, 5:37 AM PDT157post a comment
The Los Angeles Times leads Thursday with a story entitled: "Gaza's dilemma: Deadly war or suffocating Israeli embargo." According to the story, Palestinians in Gaza are left with no choice but to wage war, because if they do not fire rockets at Israeli civilians, they must accept an Israeli [sic] "embargo." The article omits the obvious point that if Hamas would stop trying to kill Israelis, neither the embargo nor the war itself would be necessary.
The authors, Alexandra Zavis and Batsheva Sobelman, accept that Hamas started the war--and even suggest that most Palestinians in Gaza support it, though there is nothing beyond anecdotal evidence to prove that claim. They also describe Hamas's smuggling tunnels to Egypt--which have been used to import deadly weapons--in positive terms, lamenting their supposed closure: "Residents are left to struggle just to get by."
Nowhere--not once--in the entire article do Zavis or Sobelman note the terror tunnels that Hamas has spent the past several years building to attack Israel, diverting humanitarian aid and building materials for that purpose. Nowhere do they mention the fact that Hamas is using Palestinians as human shields, or that Israel has offered many ceasefires, or that the rockets fired from Gaza are intended to kill as many Israeli civilians as possible.
The article presents "war" or "embargo" as a false choice for Palestinians, utterly ignoring the fact that Gazans could choose peace instead of either of those options. The authors faithfully report the skepticism of Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal towards a ceasefire, as if he is a reliable source and his reservations are justified.
In sum, the article is nothing short of pro-terror propaganda, in other words, presented to readers as front-page news.
Image: Newseum
^^^^^That is indicative of the dots that the tards avoid at all costs. They can Alinsky up all they want but they would never in a million years see any connection between the dots. More than likely what they printed defending Hamas today explains their actions back in 2003 and 2008. Obama may have shovel ready jobs but Aktard and guesser don't even know what a shovel is. They probably look at it as a giant spoon. Dots are not stars in the sky they are something you have to dig for. Connecting them is another matter and that requires a willingness to seek the truth and that cannot be done without gathering all the available data. You can draw your own conclusions.
Attempting to add something to the discussion is admirable, failing doesn’t get you any Scooby snacks.
AK and Guesser don’t deserve anything more than insults, sarcasm and baby pictures.
If what I post bothers you that’s what the ignore feature is for. Use it and save yourself the heartburn.
Want to contribute? Join Russ and I and give your opinion.
We may disagree with you but you won’t get any insults thrown your way from either myself or Russ.
I only return fire when fired upon.
