I thought Obama and the Dems were finished?

Search

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
Implementing a policy that will affect upwards of 5,000,000 people and bitching slapping Republican scum in the process is "useless trivia?" You just keep getting dumber and dumber...

And you keep dodging post 12. Why is that?
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
And you keep dodging post 12. Why is that?

I'm not dodging shit, Asap is even dumber than YOU are, and that's saying something. But, I'll play along:

Under Obama, the U.S. has reduced more carbon pollution from energy than any other nation, about 475 million tons between 2008 and 2013, according to U.S. Energy Department data. In addition, fossil fuel trade has soared under Obama as he has overseen a domestic boom in oil and natural gas production and ordered the biggest increases in fuel economy in history. In 2010, the U.S. still imported more products refined from oil than it exported. A year later, it was a bigger exporter than importer, the first time that happened since 1949. In 2012, these products were the single largest U.S. export, worth $117 billion, according to U.S. Commerce Department figures.The boom has helped the U.S. reduce oil imports and create jobs in oil fields and ports. Fuel economy standards put in place by the Obama administration are leveling off gasoline consumption for the first time. A requirement to add corn-based ethanol to gasoline also has cut into oil's share of the gasoline market. Since October 2007, U.S. automobiles have used 15.1 billion fewer gallons of gasoline and diesel, according to Michael Sivak and Brandon Schoettle of the University of Michigan. But to meet rising demand in Latin America and elsewhere, the U.S. exported nearly seven times that amount, according to U.S. Energy Department data. Better economy, fewer unemployed, more people feeling good, helps the stock market, which is largely about perception. See how that works? You probably don't, you're waaaaaaaaaay too stupid. I've answered YOUR question, Scumbag, now YOU answer MINE: how the FUCK can you refer to a policy change that directly affects 5 million people(and indirectly affects millions more) as "trivial," you brainless cocksucker???
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,365
Tokens
What a bunch of crap!

The Kenyan and his outlaw regime are job KILLERS - unless you consider part timers at McDonalds "creating jobs"??? face)(*^%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ENERGY
How the EPA Plans to Kill Jobs and Reduce Your Income


How’s your heating bill? If you feel like you’re not paying enough, you’re in luck.

President Obama’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is pushing new regulations on power plants—regulations that will kill jobs, jack up your energy costs, and even end up reducing families’ income because of the impact on the prices of everything you buy.

As Heritage experts Nicolas Loris, Kevin Dayaratna, and David Kreutzer explain:

These regulations will act as a major energy tax that would negatively impact American households. Americans will suffer through higher energy bills, but also through higher prices for goods and services, slowing the economy and crippling the manufacturing sector.
…It will cost more to heat, cool, and light homes, and to cook meals. These higher energy prices will also have rippling effects throughout the economy. As energy prices increase, the cost of making products rises.


The EPA’s war is against coal, which is the main source of electricity for 21 states. In their research, Heritage experts analyzed a phase-out of coal (thanks to the EPA’s regulations) between 2015 and 2038.

Here are their dire warnings. By the end of 2023, they project:


  • Employment falls by nearly 600,000 jobs (270,000 in manufacturing).
  • Coal-mining jobs drop 30 percent.
  • A family of four’s annual income drops more than $1,200 per year, and its total income drops by nearly $24,400 over the entire period of analysis.

And for what?

Certainly not helping the environment. The authors sum it up: “President Obama’s climate plan would have a chilling effect on the economy, not the climate.”



They explain that “regulations aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions will have no meaningful effect on global climate change. The EPA admitted this in its own proposed rule.”

So—hundreds of thousands of lost jobs, thousands in lost income, higher prices across the board—and “no noticeable climate impact.” That’s what these regulations mean.

It’s important to remember that these rules are being developed by unelected bureaucrats at the whim of the Obama Administration.

We’ve already learned that the Administration delayed a number of controversial regulations, including energy-related ones, conveniently until after the 2012 election. Why? Because they’re harmful to Americans.

The authority to make such sweeping changes doesn’t belong to these unelected bureaucrats, the Heritage experts say. Congress should take back its power and prevent these rules from inflicting harm on the economy—and our wallets.

Read the Morning Bell and more en español every day at Heritage Libertad.

http://dailysignal.com/2013/12/17/epa-plans-kill-jobs-reduce-income/

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dabitch = brainwashed left wing loon with his tongue caught in Rachel Madcow's beaver!

:pucking:

 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
I'm not dodging shit, Asap is even dumber than YOU are, and that's saying something. But, I'll play along:

Under Obama, the U.S. has reduced more carbon pollution from energy than any other nation, about 475 million tons between 2008 and 2013, according to U.S. Energy Department data. In addition, fossil fuel trade has soared under Obama as he has overseen a domestic boom in oil and natural gas production and ordered the biggest increases in fuel economy in history. In 2010, the U.S. still imported more products refined from oil than it exported. A year later, it was a bigger exporter than importer, the first time that happened since 1949. In 2012, these products were the single largest U.S. export, worth $117 billion, according to U.S. Commerce Department figures.The boom has helped the U.S. reduce oil imports and create jobs in oil fields and ports. Fuel economy standards put in place by the Obama administration are leveling off gasoline consumption for the first time. A requirement to add corn-based ethanol to gasoline also has cut into oil's share of the gasoline market. Since October 2007, U.S. automobiles have used 15.1 billion fewer gallons of gasoline and diesel, according to Michael Sivak and Brandon Schoettle of the University of Michigan. But to meet rising demand in Latin America and elsewhere, the U.S. exported nearly seven times that amount, according to U.S. Energy Department data. Better economy, fewer unemployed, more people feeling good, helps the stock market, which is largely about perception. See how that works? You probably don't, you're waaaaaaaaaay too stupid. I've answered YOUR question, Scumbag, now YOU answer MINE: how the FUCK can you refer to a policy change that directly affects 5 million people(and indirectly affects millions more) as "trivial," you brainless cocksucker???

Blah, blah, blah.

The oil boom was in spite of Obama not because of him.

God you’re dense.

Those 5 million are illegal immigrants. I guess next you’re going to tell me they are the reason the market is at an all time high.

Any other Liberal brilliance you want to share?

Before you do you might want to pray to your Lord and Savior for some guidance.

Obama_God.jpg
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,365
Tokens
The only thing worse than Obama...

a3444821-128-trash-and-other-debris-scattered-across-the-national-mall-after-obama-inauguration-ceremony.jpg


...is the trash that voted for him, which will still be around after he leaves office.

:neenee:
 

New member
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
2,625
Tokens
The White House gave new hope to 5 million immigrants, and there wasn’t much Republicans could do about it.

@):mad:

Yes, because people in America illegally are now "immigrants"

And the President suddenly deciding to re-write immigration law by himself is something to cheer about.

What a complete moron you are.


17 states sue Obama for executive order on immigration

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-texas-sues-obama-immigration-20141203-story.html#page=1

You might want to stop getting your news from media matters, idiot.


Andrew Hansen Tthe federal judge assigned to rule in the lawsuit over President Barack Obama's changes to immigration rules last year accused the Obama administration of participating in criminal conspiracies to smuggle children into the country by reuniting them with parents living here illegally. This isn't some lunatic leftwinger who will decide whether BO acted legally.

Under Title 8 Section 1325 of the U.S. Code, "Improper Entry by Alien," any citizen of any country other than the United States who:
• Enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers; or
• Eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers; or
• Attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact; has committed a federal crime.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Blah, blah, blah.

The oil boom was in spite of Obama not because of him.

God you’re dense.

Those 5 million are illegal immigrants. I guess next you’re going to tell me they are the reason the market is at an all time high.

Any other Liberal brilliance you want to share?

Before you do you might want to pray to your Lord and Savior for some guidance.

Obama_God.jpg

Gee, I never would have predicted your response. It's hilarious how if gas prices go up, Obama will get the blame without explanation, but when they go down, he doesn't get credit even with explanation. The gas boom went up in spite of him? Why don't you explain how that is, Genius? Whether you want to admit it or not, many illegal immigrants contribute to the country, and anybody who says that something that affects more than 5 million people is "trivial(as is the rescue of hostages from a hostile nation)," is, by definition, a fucking moron. Why don't you regal us all with your crackerjack predictions from 2012, Jagoff? It's gonna happen all over again, in both the Senate and White House, you're gonna take it up the ass again, and I'll be right here to rub your nose in it, AGAIN...
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Blah, blah, blah.

The oil boom was in spite of Obama not because of him.

God you’re dense.

Those 5 million are illegal immigrants. I guess next you’re going to tell me they are the reason the market is at an all time high.

Any other Liberal brilliance you want to share?

Before you do you might want to pray to your Lord and Savior for some guidance.

Obama_God.jpg

Gee, I never would have predicted your response. It's hilarious how if gas prices go up, Obama will get the blame without explanation, but when they go down, he doesn't get credit even with explanation. The gas boom went up in spite of him? Why don't you explain how that is, Genius? Whether you want to admit it or not, many illegal immigrants contribute to the country, and anybody who says that something that affects more than 5 million people is "trivial(as is the rescue of hostages from a hostile nation)," is, by definition, a fucking moron. Why don't you regal us all with your crackerjack predictions from 2012, Jagoff? It's gonna happen all over again, unlike in 2008 and 2012, I'm confident in making this prediction almost 2 years out: in both the Senate and White House, you're gonna take it up the ass again, and I'll be right here to rub your nose in it, AGAIN...
 

Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
2,755
Tokens
Gee, I never would have predicted your response. It's hilarious how if gas prices go up, Obama will get the blame without explanation, but when they go down, he doesn't get credit even with explanation. The gas boom went up in spite of him? Why don't you explain how that is, Genius? Whether you want to admit it or not, many illegal immigrants contribute to the country, and anybody who says that something that affects more than 5 million people is "trivial(as is the rescue of hostages from a hostile nation)," is, by definition, a fucking moron. Why don't you regal us all with your crackerjack predictions from 2012, Jagoff? It's gonna happen all over again, in both the Senate and White House, you're gonna take it up the ass again, and I'll be right here to rub your nose in it, AGAIN...


Gas prices were $1.84 a gallon when Obama came into office. We are supposed to get excited about gas prices falling below $3.00 a gallon?

Gruberism at it's finest, The American electorate is too stupid to figure it out.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
You have to appreciate the irony here.

DumbFinch posts a puff piece that the Stutering Clusterfuck may as well have written himself. The article makes a lot of major assumptions without backing up the claims. He asks posters to challenge the specific content rather than just attack the source, so they do.

Then, Ace asks DumbFinch to list the specific reasons the Stuttering Clusterfuck should be given credit for the recent good economic news, and he can't do it...because there are none. So DumbFinch goes on to attack the posters who asked him to do that.

You literally can't make this up.

You're another moron who talked shit in 2012 and was left with cum on your chin and a goof look on your face. Why don't you give us YOUR reason why gas prices are low, Scumbag?
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Gas prices were $1.84 a gallon when Obama came into office. We are supposed to get excited about gas prices falling below $3.00 a gallon?

Gruberism at it's finest, The American electorate is too stupid to figure it out.

Lol, Gas prices rose dramatically while George W. Bush was in the White House and the GOP controlled all three branches of government (after they complained that gas prices were too high under Clinton/Gore and promised to lower them) , dropped significantly during the Bush/Cheney recession, and are but eventually returned to the previous trend. I guess you forgot that in July 2008, the prices were at $4.25, huh?
 

$5 foot long
Joined
Mar 7, 2007
Messages
48
Tokens
Lol, Gas prices rose dramatically while George W. Bush was in the White House and the GOP controlled all three branches of government (after they complained that gas prices were too high under Clinton/Gore and promised to lower them) , dropped significantly during the Bush/Cheney recession, and are but eventually returned to the previous trend. I guess you forgot that in July 2008, the prices were at $4.25, huh?

Who controlled the House and the Senate back in 2008?
 

Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
2,755
Tokens
Lol, Gas prices rose dramatically while George W. Bush was in the White House and the GOP controlled all three branches of government (after they complained that gas prices were too high under Clinton/Gore and promised to lower them) , dropped significantly during the Bush/Cheney recession, and are but eventually returned to the previous trend. I guess you forgot that in July 2008, the prices were at $4.25, huh?

No more than you conveniently forgot that the Democrats owned both Houses after the election and 100% from 2008-10 and up to this past election 2/3. Oil prices are subject to extreme spikes and usually correct themselves and they did after 2008. The fact is that when Bush left, prices were $1.84 a gallon. Under this administration prices have stayed consistently high, an unprecedented event. No matter how anyone tries to spin it, those are the facts.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Who controlled the House and the Senate back in 2008?

And who was the President in July 2008, and had been, arguably, the worst President in history for 8 long years? You think you can undo 8 years of fuckups in 2 seconds? That idiot who ran against Obma crowed that he could get the unemployment down to 6%, but that he would need 4 years to do. It's down to less than that in less than 2, but, of course, you guys will ignore that and prattle on about the "real" unemployment rate.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
18,212
Tokens
Obama is more than a lame duck, he is a dead duck. Everything he has done and will do since the eviction notice was served to Congress will label him for what he is. His legacy will be worse than Carter's by far.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
2,625
Tokens
Obama is more than a lame duck, he is a dead duck. Everything he has done and will do since the eviction notice was served to Congress will label him for what he is. His legacy will be worse than Carter's by far.

Worse than Johnson? That's a close one, they're neck & neck!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,817
Messages
13,573,570
Members
100,877
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com