Many live in that bubble...simply doesn't allow them to understand what's happening around them. It's why they scratch their heads when the election predictions they make go way wrong. You think willie or gasman actually knows anyone on welfare? Anyone who has worked with welfare reciepents understands that most are doing what they can to get back to work and off welfare. Gasman thinks welfare people are living some grand lifestyle
Many live in that bubble...simply doesn't allow them to understand what's happening around them. It's why they scratch their heads when the election predictions they make go way wrong. You think willie or gasman actually knows anyone on welfare? Anyone who has worked with welfare reciepents understands that most are doing what they can to get back to work and off welfare. Gasman thinks welfare people are living some grand lifestyle
I would say that when I get into a debate I'm usually better prepared and more ready to support my conclusions than the guy with the opposing point. But so what? The thread sinks, the points are either forgotten or the debate rebooted in a future thread. And to what significance is it all? This is just a small meaningless spot in cyberspace. In reality every poster here is undefeated, while also winless.
This is why people like you are fucking naive twits. I just happen to know several people on welfare, just about any family making under 40k a year are on some type of government assistance whether it's WIC, EBT, subsidized housing, whatever the fuck.
Anyone who understands welfare recipients knows that most are doing what they can to con the system and stay on welfare.
I don't think welfare recipients are living a grand lifestyle, the problem is they live too well.
You guys are insane if you think this way. That's what makes you democratic liberal white apologist losers.
Hmm...interesting statements here. I believe strongly in education. I am educated. Science is vital to everything....what you ass clowns don't believe is that science can be manipulated...just look at the global warming scandals that have taken place the last couple of....OH WAIT...IS THAT ANOTHER SCANDAL? WOW! Shocker...
Check this out shit for brains.
The Australian Bureau of Meteorology has been caught red-handed manipulating temperature data to show "global warming" where none actually exists.
At Amberley, Queensland, for example, the data at a weather station showing 1 degree Celsius cooling per century was "homogenized" (adjusted) by the Bureau so that it instead showed a 2.5 degrees warming per century.
At Rutherglen, Victoria, a cooling trend of -0.35 degrees C per century was magically transformed at the stroke of an Australian meteorologist's pen into a warming trend of 1.73 degrees C per century.
Last year, the Australian Bureau of Meteorology made headlines in the liberal media by claiming that 2013 was Australia's hottest year on record. This prompted Australia's alarmist-in-chief Tim Flannery - an English literature graduate who later went on to earn his scientific credentials with a PhD in palaeontology, digging up ancient kangaroo bones - to observe that global warming in Australia was "like climate change on steroids."
But we now know, thanks to research by Australian scientist Jennifer Marohasy, that the hysteria this story generated was based on fabrications and lies.
Though the Bureau of Meteorology has insisted its data adjustments are "robust", it has been unable to come up with a credible explanation as to why it translated real-world data showing a cooling trend into homogenized data showing a warming trend.
She wrote:
“Repetition is a propaganda technique. The deletion of information from records, and the use of exaggeration and half-truths, are �others. The Bureau of Meteorology uses all these techniques, while wilfully ignoring evidence that contradicts its own propaganda.’’
This is a global problem. Earlier this year, Breitbart reported that similarly dishonest adjustments had been made to temperature records by NASA and NOAA. Similarly implicated are the UK temperature records of the Met Office Hadley Centre and at Phil "Climategate" Jones's disgraced Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia.
One of the many disingenuous arguments used by climate alarmists against sceptics is mockingly to accuse them of being conspiracy theorists. "How could global warming possibly not be a problem when all the world's temperature data sets from Australia to the US to the UK clearly show that it is? Are you seriously suggesting that so many different scientists and so many distinguished institutions from across the globe would collude in such a massive lie?" their argument runs.
Our answer: yes we bloody well are.
Exactly my point..your butt buddy vitterd is always boasting about his knockouts.
You always posting about how you are smarter than everyone else.
LOL,,..then you turn around and call others losers that doing basically the same thing.
God you guys are fucking retarded. Do liberal men have balls or do they just have an empty void between their legs.
