I rather vote for the KKK than a Democrat

[xpanda]

TT: the survivability of feminist success is wholeheartedly dependent on women's control of their reproductive choices.

Every early feminist scholar has pondered the relationship between our dependence upon men and the ownership of our bodies, in general, and our sexual freedom, specifically. Since the beginning of civilisations, when men finally figured out that they play a role in reproduction, they have tried to own it, control it, and manipulate it. To accomplish this task, we had to be subjugated, abused, beaten, and stripped of all human rights.

You'd have to go through a herd of us to try to reverse the strides we've made.

 

[xpanda]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Patriot:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Xpanda, yes I agree that the baby is fully dependent on the mother for survival. Does that automatically giver her the right to abort it?

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
TT and X,using that logic that would mean you could abort up until the age of about 5 years old.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Not true. While a baby is dependent on someone, that someone does not have to be its mother.

 

[PatPatriot]

The problem with abortion is after a while it is just used as a form of birth control...I mean there are married couples who have had 2 or 3 abortions...how sick is that?
Just like gay marriage...next it will be animal marrige..or polygamy marriage...Why should sheep lovers be discriminated against?
And people worry about global warming...oh my aching ass!

 

[barman]

Truthteller asks: Who are you to determine whether a fetus has rights? Are you God?

B: No, but She and I are on good terms....

Anyway, it doesn't matter what "I" think. Nor does it matter what 'you' think.

The only thing that matters is the opinion of the SCOTUS. And they have determined that a woman has the right to choose termination whenever she wants prior to a successful delivery.

"My" opinion happens to agree with theirs, but it's them, not me, that you have your complaint with.

If I changed my opinion today and joined you in your crusade to imprison women who choose to terminate unwanted pregnancies, it still wouldn't matter. All that matters is the opinion of the SCOTUS.

Oh, but I won't since I believe that a woman is the only one worthy of making that very difficult choice.

 

[truthteller]

The SCOTUS also thought slavery was the in thing at one time.

 

[lander]

Aborterers should have their limbs torn off and have their brains sucked out with much like they do to the babies that they kill.

Of course, no anethesia (sp?) will be administered.

 

[lander]

This is what you satanic fuks support

 

[truthteller]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by lander:
Aborterers should have their limbs torn off and have their brains sucked out with much like they do to the babies that they kill.

Of course, no anethesia (sp?) will be administered.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Or better yet have their kids go through it. Murderous fuks.

 

[barman]

When I mentioned that the only opinion that matters given current law is that of the SCOTUS, Truthteller replied:

"The SCOTUS also thought slavery was the in thing at one time."


B: Very shaky supposition. The 19th century SCOTUS was not faced with many direct challenges as to the constitutionality of slavery, until the second half of the century. And regardless of how a particular group of nine Justices might have felt, it was all made moot with the passage of the 13th Amendment.

See, the American populace as a whole decried slavery. So Congress passed a Constitutional Amendment, which means that over 2/3 of both House and Senate had to vote for it. Then 3/4 of the states at that time had to also vote for it and ratify it.

At that point the opinion of the SCOTUS was nullified and replaced with their needing to respect the newly ratified Amendment.

In 2004, no such mandate could be found for making abortion a criminal act today.

You wouldn't even be able to get all Republican congresscritters to vote yes to an amendment that would mandate criminal charges akin to murder for a woman who chose to terminate.

Hell, it took over a dozen years of a Republican controlled Congress to even get this so called 'partial birth' bill passed. And that insult to the Constitution will end up in the trashbin just like all other attempts to criminalize abortion have since 1973.

You need 2/3 of Congress to amend the Constitution and then you would need 38 states to ratify it. You're not likely to get anywhere near half of either figure.

Your gripe is not with me, but with the fact that your religous beliefs are not shared by the neccesary percentage of Americans needed to amend the Consitution. Until you can do that, the SCOTUS will have to respect the Constitution as it stands.

 

[hellah10]

These fuking liberals are ruining the U.S. First they took God out of school, then they have been legally murdering millions of innocent lives, now they want to legalise gay marriage.

If a KKK was running against a liberal, the KKK would get my vote. The KKK is the much lesser of 2 evils.

This is coming from someone that's not WHITE

:lol: