You don't understand do you? Say GS comes in and values the team at 1.1B. He could then argue there is a greater value and go to court and contest it. You think whatever the NBA wants or says is the law. There is a judicial process by which Sterling can fight this. Where did you go to law school?
You think the NBA doesn't have this in their Constitution? That forcing an owner out, the owner might "refuse". Come on now. You don't even need to go to law school to understand the NBA can force him to sell regardless of whether he accepts the price or not. You keep acting like the NBA is a government and has no control over its franchise owners. Damn bro, that's really dumb.
Notice a law professor said this:
"I tend to believe the opinion of others with more expertise than myself." While noting this is going to be litigated for years.
And someone who is comically uninformed, has no relevant experience or education on the matter (and who has a low IQ) said:
Why this silly little kid insists on posting this silly blather every single day showing everyone he is an utter fool, isn't clear.
"I tend to believe the opinion of others with more expertise than myself." While noting this is going to be litigated for years.
And someone who is comically uninformed, has no relevant experience or education on the matter (and who has a low IQ) said:
Why this silly little kid insists on posting this silly blather every single day showing everyone he is an utter fool, isn't clear.
CBS just reported that in a confidential survey, 16 NBA owners support forcing the sale of the Clippers and 8 owners declined to take a position.
[Most NBA ownership groups reached Tuesday by the Associated Press said they will vote to force Sterling to sell. The teams were asked the specific question of whether Sterling should be forced to sell, and 16 ownership groups said yes, while eight declined to reveal their stance.]
[Most NBA ownership groups reached Tuesday by the Associated Press said they will vote to force Sterling to sell. The teams were asked the specific question of whether Sterling should be forced to sell, and 16 ownership groups said yes, while eight declined to reveal their stance.]
This article from SI on the matter is pretty good:
Sterling suing may lead to pretrial discovery, which could be designed in part to embarrass other owners and NBA officials of any bigoted remarks or beliefs on their part. Keep in mind, if Sterling is ousted because of racism, he would likely demand that evidence showing that other owners and officials are also racist be shared. He would use such information to portray his penalty as unwarranted and contradicted by the conduct of those who ousted him. Sterling might request emails and other records from owners and officials that depict them in a negative light. Sterling has owned the Clippers for 33 years, which suggests that he has had many interactions -- including private conversations with league officials and owners. If there are other owners who are racist or bigoted, it stands to reason Sterling knows who they are.
Sterling suing may lead to pretrial discovery, which could be designed in part to embarrass other owners and NBA officials of any bigoted remarks or beliefs on their part. Keep in mind, if Sterling is ousted because of racism, he would likely demand that evidence showing that other owners and officials are also racist be shared. He would use such information to portray his penalty as unwarranted and contradicted by the conduct of those who ousted him. Sterling might request emails and other records from owners and officials that depict them in a negative light. Sterling has owned the Clippers for 33 years, which suggests that he has had many interactions -- including private conversations with league officials and owners. If there are other owners who are racist or bigoted, it stands to reason Sterling knows who they are.
