How Are They Going To Force Sterling To Sell??

[Enfuego]

Lmao, both those lawyers in the video I presented disagree with you. Like I said from the beginning, this isn't the same battle that private sector businesses have with the government or other lawsuits. This is the NBA, and the NBA has the ability to kick someone out that is hurting their league. I have provided numerous sources that have proved you wrong including case law where judges respect the agreements between owners.

I'm beginning to think you are just dumb. Trust me on this, you should listen to me instead of make comments. I'm usually right on real world issues.

Ya know what, I haven't argued with you at all in this thread. Haven't been derogatory at all, been respectful and listened to your opinion. Now, you've called me a retard, nut job and dumb.

What's with you man? Why can't you just discuss an issue without acting like a donkey?

 

[Enfuego]

I mean, really, if you think Sterling has no legal recourse here, you are just delusional about the situation. It's either that or...you really are trolling and making a serious effort to just keep the thread going longer and longer for no apparent reason whatsoever.

 

[akphidelt]

Ya know what, I haven't argued with you at all in this thread. Haven't been derogatory at all, been respectful and listened to your opinion. Now, you've called me a retard, nut job and dumb.

What's with you man? Why can't you just discuss an issue without acting like a donkey?

Oh grow up dude, your last post was condescending and you are wrong about this issue. The NBA has control over its organization like I've said the whole time. It will be an easy case and the Constitution proves it. Owners waive all right to sue the league once a decision is made. What part of that do you not understand? You think they just sign contracts and agree to things that don't mean anything. Please. You need to smarten up.

 

[akphidelt]

I mean, really, if you think Sterling has no legal recourse here, you are just delusional about the situation. It's either that or...you really are trolling and making a serious effort to just keep the thread going longer and longer for no apparent reason whatsoever.

He has no real recourse for legal action other than an antitrust claim that he will not win.

 

[Enfuego]

Oh grow up dude, your last post was condescending and you are wrong about this issue. The NBA has control over its organization like I've said the whole time. It will be an easy case and the Constitution proves it. Owners waive all right to sue the league once a decision is made. What part of that do you not understand? You think they just sign contracts and agree to things that don't mean anything. Please. You need to smarten up.

You've called anyone that doesn't agree with you here a retard, nut job and dumb. And you tell me to grow up?

Whatever you say.

 

[Enfuego]

He has no real recourse for legal action other than an antitrust claim that he will not win.

And you have no basis in which to form this opinion. You are not a lawyer.

Maybe he'll win, maybe he won't but he has a case.

 

[PatsFan1283]

Is there any news on when the vote is gonna be? You guys seem glued to this...

 

[akphidelt]

And you have no basis in which to form this opinion. You are not a lawyer.

Maybe he'll win, maybe he won't but he has a case.

I provided two lawyers who have said the same exact thing. The owners vote is final, binding, and Sterling cannot sue. It can't be much clearer than that.

 

[akphidelt]

You've called anyone that doesn't agree with you here a retard, nut job and dumb. And you tell me to grow up?

Whatever you say.

It's just a coincidence that the people who have disagreed with me are actually retarded. If someone smart disagreed with me I would listen.

 

[Enfuego]

It's just a coincidence that the people who have disagreed with me are actually retarded. If someone smart disagreed with me I would listen.

You don't even know us.

 

[Enfuego]

I provided two lawyers who have said the same exact thing. The owners vote is final, binding, and Sterling cannot sue. It can't be much clearer than that.

And for your two lawyers, there's ten that say the opposite. It's all good. We'll see how it plays out.

 

[akphidelt]

You don't even know us.

I don't need to

 

[akphidelt]

And for your two lawyers, there's ten that say the opposite. It's all good. We'll see how it plays out.

These are lawyers talking about the actual Constitution and the process. It is very simple. Owners vote him out it is game over.

 

[Enfuego]

I don't need to

And that pretty much sums it up. I don't know you either. I wouldn't call you dumb though.

 

[PatsFan1283]

And that pretty much sums it up. I don't know you either. I wouldn't call you dumb though.

If you have no opinion why would this thread be 18 pages mostly of back and forht with you and him recently

 

[akphidelt]

And that pretty much sums it up. I don't know you either. I wouldn't call you dumb though.

I wouldn't call me dumb either if I didn't know me. Because I don't make dumb comments.

This dude is a Sports Attorney that has been involved in actual cases involving sports leagues.

http://espn.go.com/college-sports/s...jeffrey-kessler-challenges-ncaa-amateur-model

And he is laying it out as easy as it can possibly be. The decision by the owners is final, binding, and the owner waives their right to sue on the decision. The only thing he can do is an antitrust claim which he doesn't have one.

I don't even need to be a lawyer to have enough common sense to understand that an organization can vote someone out that is hurting their organization. It's just basic common sense. Apparently everyone here thinks the NBA is the government attacking a private business.

Your argument about "willfully". That is something that the owners have to determine, not the court of law. He's done bro. It will be easy.

 

[Dafinch]

And for your two lawyers, there's ten that say the opposite. It's all good. We'll see how it plays out.

Ten, huh? Embellish much? Why don't you post, say, 5 of the "ten?"

 

[Enfuego]

Ten, huh? Embellish much? Why don't you post, say, 5 of the "ten?"

They've been posted throughout the last 18 pages.

 

[Enfuego]

I wouldn't call me dumb either if I didn't know me. Because I don't make dumb comments.

This dude is a Sports Attorney that has been involved in actual cases involving sports leagues.

http://espn.go.com/college-sports/s...jeffrey-kessler-challenges-ncaa-amateur-model

And he is laying it out as easy as it can possibly be. The decision by the owners is final, binding, and the owner waives their right to sue on the decision. The only thing he can do is an antitrust claim which he doesn't have one.

I don't even need to be a lawyer to have enough common sense to understand that an organization can vote someone out that is hurting their organization. It's just basic common sense. Apparently everyone here thinks the NBA is the government attacking a private business.

Your argument about "willfully". That is something that the owners have to determine, not the court of law. He's done bro. It will be easy.

Owners of basketball teams don't determine what is willful and what is not if an antitrust case is filed in a court of law.

 

[Enfuego]

If you have no opinion why would this thread be 18 pages mostly of back and forht with you and him recently

No opinion about what?