How a Real President Responded to civilians being blown out of the sky

Search

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,899
Tokens
But your thread you started was comparing Reagan's speech 4-5 days after the event to Obama's 40 second acknowledgement of the event just hours afterward. You shouldn't make threads if you forget what your point is so easily, lol.

Watching you is fun. You try so hard but fail so much. Got to admire how you keep getting up. Most would have quit by now.

Actually, idiot, now that you've made an utter fool of yourself yet again - you do this daily - you will now attack strawmen.

Probably because you're so "educated" and stuff.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Actually, idiot, now that you've made an utter fool of yourself yet again - you do this daily - you will now attack strawmen.

Probably because you're so "educated" and stuff.

Well I'm just responding to your thread. You are talking about Obama not being engaged and saying some 40 second statement hours after the incident and comparing it to Reagan's speech 4-5 days after that incident.

You might want to understand what you're posting. But then again I'm sure you didn't know when Reagan gave his speech. Poor Ace just can't win, lol. The child gets beat worse than Joe and Willie. Fun to watch.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 29, 2012
Messages
3,101
Tokens
The Wiki Leaks documents confirmed there were chemical weapons in Iraq.

Oh, and this just happened a few weeks ago

Iraqi militants seize Saddam's top chemical weapons facility

http://www.haaretz.com/news/middle-east/1.600073

You must come here to show everyone how abjectly stupid you are.

Hahaha. If you think that is proof of WMD you are dumber than I thought. Yes a facility. A defunct facility. An accounted for facility. Wmds were never found
 

New member
Joined
Aug 29, 2012
Messages
3,101
Tokens
What did Saddam use in Habalja to kill around 5000 men, women and children?

Answer - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWOSgybdGrw
I'm not talking about did they ever have WMD!!! I'm talking during the second war in Iraq did they have any. You know about the whole disarmament and un weapons inspectors for over 10 years. By the time of the American invasion they no longer had wmds. That is the point
 

cunning linguist, master debator
Joined
Sep 22, 2006
Messages
2,426
Tokens
youre right they didnt..they had pics of the iraqi's transporting the wmd's to syria prior to the American invasion
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
I'm not talking about did they ever have WMD!!! I'm talking during the second war in Iraq did they have any. You know about the whole disarmament and un weapons inspectors for over 10 years. By the time of the American invasion they no longer had wmds. That is the point

Cause they didn't have any time to get them over the border to other countries by the time the US went over there.

To say Saddam had 0 WMD's at all makes no sense. There were traces that there were WMD's recently when the US did arrive, but they did not find any stockpiles. They just moved them or destroyed them quick enough.

There is no proof they they DID NOT have any WMDS... and all the proof was pointing that they did have them.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
youre right they didnt..they had pics of the iraqi's transporting the wmd's to syria prior to the American invasion

They don't have any pics that prove Iraqis moved WMD to Syria. They just simply have satellite images of Iraqi trucks driving to Syria. They simply are making up a story that there were WMD's in the truck.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Cause they didn't have any time to get them over the border to other countries by the time the US went over there.

To say Saddam had 0 WMD's at all makes no sense. There were traces that there were WMD's recently when the US did arrive, but they did not find any stockpiles. They just moved them or destroyed them quick enough.

There is no proof they they DID NOT have any WMDS... and all the proof was pointing that they did have them.

You can't prove a negative. The only thing we know is there was not any WMDS. And after there were not any WMDS the narrative of why we were in Iraq changed.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 19, 2008
Messages
1,205
Tokens
Cause they didn't have any time to get them over the border to other countries by the time the US went over there.

To say Saddam had 0 WMD's at all makes no sense. There were traces that there were WMD's recently when the US did arrive, but they did not find any stockpiles. They just moved them or destroyed them quick enough.

There is no proof they they DID NOT have any WMDS... and all the proof was pointing that they did have them.

I wasn't there so im not gonna pretend to know the answer to whether they had them or not but this whole post makes no logical sense. At the point that invasion was on, if they had wmds why not keep them and potentially use them...destroying them wasn't stopping the invasion...Sadam would've rather seen his country, his people and American soldiers burn to the ground than give up any potential edge he had. What is the motive in destroying them?
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
You can't prove a negative. The only thing we know is there was not any WMDS. And after there were not any WMDS the narrative of why we were in Iraq changed.

If you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it, and you will even come to believe it yourself.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
It's not even clear what happened yet. But you guys do like to jump the gun. Just like all the wmds Iraq had. And you absolute idiots actually probably stil believe Iraq was involved with 9-11

Comrade, the people you are arguing with would blame Obama no matter what he did, no matter what his response would be. If it was measured and thoughtful, as it was, they accuse him of lacking testosterone. If it was fiery and forceful, they'd accuse him of jumping the gun without the facts. That's how they roll down here. Obama is Wrong about Everything, and even when history proves him right, they just change the narrative. Once you realize that, you'll get this place. Enjoy.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
You can't prove a negative. The only thing we know is there was not any WMDS. And after there were not any WMDS the narrative of why we were in Iraq changed.

Kind of how you defend Obama on his handling of the Recession and "stopping" another great depression?
 

New member
Joined
Dec 19, 2008
Messages
1,205
Tokens
Comrade, the people you are arguing with would blame Obama no matter what he did, no matter what his response would be. If it was measured and thoughtful, as it was, they accuse him of lacking testosterone. If it was fiery and forceful, they'd accuse him of jumping the gun without the facts. That's how they roll down here. Obama is Wrong about Everything, and even when history proves him right, they just change the narrative. Once you realize that, you'll get this place. Enjoy.

hahahahaha....this is the nature of todays politics, all this Regan nostalgia going around, if he decided to run for head of the republican party today he'd probably lose and be seen as a left wing socialist. Raised taxes, pro immigration, deficit went out of control and government swelled under his watch but with time he's a superhero, today he'd probably be forced to run as a democrat
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
hahahahaha....this is the nature of todays politics, all this Regan nostalgia going around, if he decided to run for head of the republican party today he'd probably lose and be seen as a left wing socialist. Raised taxes, pro immigration, deficit went out of control and government swelled under his watch but with time he's a superhero, today he'd probably be forced to run as a democrat

We haven't had a good president since Kennedy ... and he didn't get his chance to shine long enough.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
We haven't had a good president since Kennedy ... and he didn't get his chance to shine long enough.

I thought Poppy Bush was a real good President. Knew how to get in and out of a War, what the war's intent was. Knew that raising Taxes was sometimes good and needed for the Country, Knew that Reagan's economic policies were smoke and mirrors. But he made the fatal mistake of making a stupid campaign comment about Reading his lips and taxes and got hammered for not sticking to it, even though he did the right thing for America. His demise was the demise of the Republican party as a sane, rational party, unfortunately.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,000
Tokens
Comrade, the people you are arguing with would blame Obama no matter what he did, no matter what his response would be. If it was measured and thoughtful, as it was, they accuse him of lacking testosterone. If it was fiery and forceful, they'd accuse him of jumping the gun without the facts. That's how they roll down here. Obama is Wrong about Everything, and even when history proves him right, they just change the narrative. Once you realize that, you'll get this place. Enjoy.

Comrade, Guys like sewer rat Guesser will defend Obama and suck his cock, no matter what he does. He could rape Joe Biden on national TV and Guesser would still be sucking his cock. Guys like sewer rat Guesser don't think rationally, as long as Obama is part of the Democrat Party, Guesser will bow down and worship him as Messiah.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
Comrade, Guys like sewer rat Guesser will defend Obama and suck his cock, no matter what he does. He could rape Joe Biden on national TV and Guesser would still be sucking his cock. Guys like sewer rat Guesser don't think rationally, as long as Obama is part of the Democrat Party, Guesser will bow down and worship him as Messiah.

Absolute Lie by a Vile, Muslim hating, fake Religious Racist. I've criticized Obama many, many times down here. Zit is exactly what I'm talking about, filled with irrational hate, incapable of an issue by issue response to Obama, just a knee jerk Obama is wrong in every instance.
2Q==
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Comrade, Guys like sewer rat Guesser will defend Obama and suck his cock, no matter what he does. He could rape Joe Biden on national TV and Guesser would still be sucking his cock. Guys like sewer rat Guesser don't think rationally, as long as Obama is part of the Democrat Party, Guesser will bow down and worship him as Messiah.

Nah, the Guesser will call him out... but this definitely sounds much more like you and your infatuation with Willie. It's a documented fact that you will bow down and suck his dick no matter what he says. Hahahahaha!!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,876
Messages
13,574,543
Members
100,879
Latest member
am_sports
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com