Thanks for your honest reply. My opinion of this game has to do with the opening line, team roles, ats margins of cover or no cover and travel situation. That is my method of handicapping. Every single variable in this matchup favors Rutgers, except one...the opening line. In a sense, you could call me a student of the opening line. That is why I'm so mystified. When I saw -3, it set off every handicapping alarm that I could imagine. Let me ask you this...if the opening line would have been -2', would you still have taken Rutgers? Or would you have thought that the opening line was curiously low? Me? I'm suspicious. I'm aware of traps. Most veteran bettors are. When I first saw this line, that's what I thought. T-R-A-P. But most traps are subtle. This one, imo, is obvious to a fault. I can't remember ever seeing one one this obvious. I also have a theory on "reverse traps" and I think that's what this might be. Allow JQP to bet and win the obvious side and those who think they're clever (like yours truly) will trip over their brain, take Michigan and outsmart themselves. Then again, I also have the option of "no play". I took Michigan in a few small parlays. But safe to say, I'm very interested in how this game plays out. Thanks, again.