Hillary Clinton Knockout.....Gowdy and Russ Beaten and Bloody

[neverbend]

I never knew Mrs. Clinton was doing a victory dance of the overthrow of Khaddafi until
this hearing & the fact that Mrs. Clinton was the prime mover in the American involvement
escaped me also. The amazing thing is that she still feels & is trying to persuade the public
that it was a good thing to do. Anyone who sides with her stance is insane!
Getting rid of Khaddafi turned Libya into a hellhole with radical Islamic groups fighting
each other & having 100 or more Khaddafi wannabees vying for power it was a terrible
decision as bad or worse than invading Iraq. Even Bush's brother admits Iraq was a big time mistake
yet Mrs. Clinton still insists that the Libyan indulgence was a big time success. Doesn't she even
realize that if Khaddafi would have been left alone the tragedy of 4 American deaths at
Bengazi would never had occurred. Incompetence of extraordinary proportions she still
touts as one of her successes & some are buying her story! Wow how ignorant some creatures
who have been given to vote in this country can be.

 

[vitterd]

Wipe the blood off your messy face . JDeuce just knocked you the fuck out !!!

Lmao.....actually he didn't.....he just showed he didn't see the hearing and I pointed out why.

 

[The Guesser]

Cleary you didn't see much of this farce hearing today. The democrats on the committee are trying to get ALL of the Blumenthal emails released instead of the pick and choose method by Gowdy.

The investigation was supposed to be about if there was a failure on state dept to provide security for embassy personnel. Every report says no.....there wasn't a failure, there was no stand down order and everything that could be done was done. The video and Blumenthal has nothing to do with it. They are now trying to make it seem that because he had access to Clinton and Stevens didn't, that blood is on her hands. Of course that's been proven totally false.

But the Dems want to hide Blumenthal in a corner. That's these idiots like J Deuce's talking points now. They are be-clowning themselves worse than this farcical committee in their partisan hackery.

 

[vitterd]

But the Dems want to hide Blumenthal in a corner. That's these idiots like J Deuce's talking points now. They are be-clowning themselves worse than this farcical committee in their partisan hackery.

And then the kiss ass chorus like Lenbo comes in and backs it up. Amazing stuff here.

The one dem congressman screamed the loudest on trying to get a vote to release all the emails. Lol

 

[JDeuce]

But the Dems want to hide Blumenthal in a corner. That's these idiots like J Deuce's talking points now. They are be-clowning themselves worse than this farcical committee in their partisan hackery.

Uh huh.

Do you have the first fucking clue about what legal scope means or how it is applied? What would be the point of releasing every e-mail when only the relevant ones need to be discussed in this hearing?

If a guy is on trial for murder and only one of his 10,000 e-mails sitting in his inbox mention the murder, the prosecution is not going to review the other 9,999 e-mails for the jury if they are irrelevant to the case.

In case it wasn't apparent earlier, Blumenthal was involved in the cover up. I'm sorry you're too fucking dense to grasp why that'd be important and within the scope of the investigation. Maybe Vince McMahon can hire a character to play an attorney...some of this might sink in for you after a few more years of watching Raw is War.

 

[vitterd]

Uh huh.

Do you have the first fucking clue about what legal scope means or how it is applied? What would be the point of releasing every e-mail when only the relevant ones need to be discussed in this hearing?

If a guy is on trial for murder and only one of his 10,000 e-mails sitting in his inbox mention the murder, the prosecution is not going to review the other 9,999 e-mails for the jury if they are irrelevant to the case.

In case it wasn't apparent earlier, Blumenthal was involved in the cover up. I'm sorry you're too fucking dense to grasp why that'd be important and within the scope of the investigation.

Youre not getting this. It is a big deal because if Gowdy decides what's relevant he can shape a specific narrative which is exactly what he's trying to do. You can pick out certain emails and take them out of context in a number of ways. Dems want them all released to show context and true narrative.....not something shaped by a prosecutor. That's why it's relevant.

 

[The Guesser]

Uh huh.

Do you have the first fucking clue about what legal scope means or how it is applied? What would be the point of releasing every e-mail when only the relevant ones need to be discussed in this hearing?

If a guy is on trial for murder and only one of his 10,000 e-mails sitting in his inbox mention the murder, the prosecution is not going to review the other 9,999 e-mails for the jury if they are irrelevant to the case.

In case it wasn't apparent earlier, Blumenthal was involved in the cover up. I'm sorry you're too fucking dense to grasp why that'd be important and within the scope of the investigation. Maybe Vince McMahon can hire a character to play an attorney...some of this might sink in for you after a few more years of watching Raw is War.

There is no cover up, idiot. This is the EIGHTH Committee covering the same shit, only this one is blatantly, and nakedly a partisan witch hunt.

 

[The Guesser]

Congressman Adam Smith said it best just now. At this point, all the R's are trying to do is get a sound bite they can edit, like "What Difference does it make"for their Campaigns. This is pathetic and offensive.

 

[vitterd]

Wow..... Now a republican loon woman from Alabama is trying to insinuate that Hillary didn't care about the surviving personnel. "When did you speak with survivors". Just unreal idiots. What a bunch of scumbag republicans on this committee.

 

[vitterd]

Congressman Adam Smith said it best just now. At this point, all the R's are trying to do is get a sound bite for their Campaigns. This is pathetic.

Smith has been on it all day. As you would say. He's nailed it!

 

[The Guesser]

Smith has been on it all day. As you would say. He's nailed it!

Yes, he has. He is doing a great job right now exposing the whole farce for what it is.

 

[The Guesser]

This tool Jordan is the poster boy for the sick, political witch hunt. I bet idiots like Casper are already beating off to him. He hasn't even said the word Benghazi in his questioning.

 

[SheriffJoe]

Uh huh.

Do you have the first fucking clue about what legal scope means or how it is applied? What would be the point of releasing every e-mail when only the relevant ones need to be discussed in this hearing?

If a guy is on trial for murder and only one of his 10,000 e-mails sitting in his inbox mention the murder, the prosecution is not going to review the other 9,999 e-mails for the jury if they are irrelevant to the case.

In case it wasn't apparent earlier, Blumenthal was involved in the cover up. I'm sorry you're too fucking dense to grasp why that'd be important and within the scope of the investigation. Maybe Vince McMahon can hire a character to play an attorney...some of this might sink in for you after a few more years of watching Raw is War.

No, but he understands what libtard scope is:

 

[vitterd]

This tool Jordan is the poster boy for the sick, political witch hunt. I bet idiots like Casper are already beating off to him. He hasn't even said the word Benghazi in his questioning.

The republicans on this committee are a total disgrace and I think they really helped Hillary presidential campaign today.

 

[JDeuce]

There is no cover up, idiot. This is the EIGHTH Committee covering the same shit, only this one is blatantly, and nakedly a partisan witch hunt.

Of course...you're still out there.

Why else would her story change repeatedly, shithead?

Btw, the cover-up also extends to your precious Stuttering Clusterfuck of a Miserable Failure. Except you wouldn't understand how...because in your myopic view, no dimocrap has ever committed a crime since every single hearing is a "witch hunt."

 

[The Guesser]

Of course...you're still out there.

Why else would her story change repeatedly, shithead?

Btw, the cover-up also extends to your precious Stuttering Clusterfuck of a Miserable Failure. Except you wouldn't understand how...because in your myopic view, no dimocrap has ever committed a crime since every single hearing is a "witch hunt."

Of course, a blatant, Partisan Hack Lie. The original Benghazi Investigation and hearing was necessary. By the EIGHTH one, it's blatantly obvious what it was, and that's before one of the highest ranking R's admitted it and boasted about it to try and prove his Wingnut Bonafides.

 

[SheriffJoe]

Of course, a blatant, Partisan Hack Lie. The original Benghazi Investigation and hearing was necessary. By the EIGHTH one, it's blatantly obvious what it was, and that's before one of the highest ranking R's admitted it and boasted about it to try and prove his Wingnut Bonafides.

Actually, there could be twenty hearings. As long as this regime refused to release key documents and blocked witnesses from testifying, well...

 

[JDeuce]

Of course, a blatant, Partisan Hack Lie. The original Benghazi Investigation and hearing was necessary. By the EIGHTH one, it's blatantly obvious what it was, and that's before one of the highest ranking R's admitted it and boasted about it to try and prove his Wingnut Bonafides.

You claim they looked and found nothing, except Trey Gowdy said that their committee is the first to have asked for e-mails from the Ambassador. Don't you think that may contain key information?

Yeah, real bang-up thorough jobs those seven other committees did.

She had an unauthorized server. She did a large part of her personal and Sec State business through that server. She had classified information on that server.

None of this is disputed.

Therefore, she should be indicted under the Espionage Act. It has a section just for people like Hitlery. People too good to follow the rules and precautions.

Whoever stripped the markings on that information is also criminally liable. But it doesn't matter one bit if the fat old hag was aware or unaware that the material was classified...her negligence exposed it. And only a total fucking IDIOT of the first magnitude could possibly think the SoS didn't know intelligence information and sources weren't at least secret.

Are you a total fucking idiot of the first magnitude?

(yes, that was rhetorical)

Now, what's your next strawman du jour you'd like me to obliterate and continue to expose your ever-increasing idiocy?

 

[vitterd]

You claim they looked and found nothing, except Trey Gowdy said that their committee is the first to have asked for e-mails from the Ambassador. Don't you think that may contain key information?

Yeah, real bang-up thorough jobs those seven other committees did.

She had an unauthorized server. She did a large part of her personal and Sec State business through that server. She had classified information on that server.

None of this is disputed.

Therefore, she should be indicted under the Espionage Act. It has a section just for people like Hitlery. People too good to follow the rules and precautions.

Whoever stripped the markings on that information is also criminally liable. But it doesn't matter one bit if the fat old hag was aware or unaware that the material was classified...her negligence exposed it. And only a total fucking IDIOT of the first magnitude could possibly think the SoS didn't know intelligence information and sources weren't at least secret.

Are you a total fucking idiot of the first magnitude?

(yes, that was rhetorical)

Now, what's your next strawman du jour you'd like me to obliterate and continue to expose your ever-increasing idiocy?

You need to watch the hearing today. I think there is a reason that Gowdy suggested a closed door, no cameras hearing. It's obvious why....what Gowdy says and what the record says are two completely different things.

It would be worth your time to read the cliff notes of the first 8 investigations and then watch today's hearing.

There will never be any prosecution of Hillary on emails or anything else and it isn't because there is some big cover up. It's because much of the "evidence" spewed by congressional republicans is largely false.

 

[SheriffJoe]