Hilarious TRUMP Lovers

[The Guesser]

Donald Trump’s hate-filled speech helps ISIS

Donald Trump’s views on Muslims deserve strong condemnation
More Republican presidential candidates should speak out against them
Unfortunately, his ideas will help ISIS recruit more people to oppose America

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump spoke to supporters Friday at Dorton Arena in Raleigh, N.C. Chuck Liddy cliddy@newsobserver.com


The Editorial Board

Donald Trump “is a race-baiting, xenophobic, religious bigot.... You know how you make America great again? Tell Donald Trump to go to hell.”
Well said, U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina. We only wish more Republicans running for president would join you in clearly rejecting the latest abhorrent views from the current national leader of the GOP campaign.
And yet Trump’s hate-filled and utterly impractical idea of blocking Muslims from entering the United States is getting traction within parts of the party.
The same GOP presidential candidates who could be speaking against Trump’s buffoonery have uttered similarly appalling approaches to national affairs.
After the November attacks in Paris, they spoke out in ugly fashion against allowing Syrian refugees into the country. And the anti-immigration crowd is strong in top GOP circles.
Most of the candidates have made their pact with the devil, all to woo older, ultra-conservative, white Republican voters eager to vote in the party’s primaries.
It’s particularly disturbing, and even shocking, to see crowds of fawning Trump supporters yelling in favor of the dangerous nonsense their candidate is spouting.
As Trump’s idea on Muslims circulated Tuesday, some Republican voices did speak out against it. They included Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback, who said, “I disagree with it. I question its constitutionality as well.”
Trump’s plan would violate the First Amendment’s guarantee of religious freedom and the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of equal treatment under the law.
It’s worthwhile to point out — if just to have some kind of hope to hang on to in this crazy political season — that the great majority of Americans do not favor the kind of ignorant bile Trump is peddling.
Yet his speech has real and dangerous effects around the globe.
Fomenting hate of Muslims plays into the hands of the Islamic State. It allows the extremists to claim Americans are opponents of the religious views held by hundreds of millions of Muslims.
Donald Trump is the best recruiting tool ISIS has today.
As Graham aptly noted, “He is helping the enemy of this nation. He is empowering radical Islam.”
That makes Trump appear to be something like a domestic terrorist. He has no business running for the White House, much less ever sitting in the Oval Office.

 

[The Guesser]

http://www.kansascity.com/opinion/editorials/article48698340.html

 

[superbeets]

Donald Trump’s hate-filled speech helps ISIS

Donald Trump’s views on Muslims deserve strong condemnation
More Republican presidential candidates should speak out against them
Unfortunately, his ideas will help ISIS recruit more people to oppose America

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump spoke to supporters Friday at Dorton Arena in Raleigh, N.C. Chuck Liddy cliddy@newsobserver.com


The Editorial Board

Donald Trump “is a race-baiting, xenophobic, religious bigot.... You know how you make America great again? Tell Donald Trump to go to hell.”
Well said, U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina. We only wish more Republicans running for president would join you in clearly rejecting the latest abhorrent views from the current national leader of the GOP campaign.
And yet Trump’s hate-filled and utterly impractical idea of blocking Muslims from entering the United States is getting traction within parts of the party.
The same GOP presidential candidates who could be speaking against Trump’s buffoonery have uttered similarly appalling approaches to national affairs.
After the November attacks in Paris, they spoke out in ugly fashion against allowing Syrian refugees into the country. And the anti-immigration crowd is strong in top GOP circles.
Most of the candidates have made their pact with the devil, all to woo older, ultra-conservative, white Republican voters eager to vote in the party’s primaries.
It’s particularly disturbing, and even shocking, to see crowds of fawning Trump supporters yelling in favor of the dangerous nonsense their candidate is spouting.
As Trump’s idea on Muslims circulated Tuesday, some Republican voices did speak out against it. They included Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback, who said, “I disagree with it. I question its constitutionality as well.”
Trump’s plan would violate the First Amendment’s guarantee of religious freedom and the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of equal treatment under the law.
It’s worthwhile to point out — if just to have some kind of hope to hang on to in this crazy political season — that the great majority of Americans do not favor the kind of ignorant bile Trump is peddling.
Yet his speech has real and dangerous effects around the globe.
Fomenting hate of Muslims plays into the hands of the Islamic State. It allows the extremists to claim Americans are opponents of the religious views held by hundreds of millions of Muslims.
Donald Trump is the best recruiting tool ISIS has today.
As Graham aptly noted, “He is helping the enemy of this nation. He is empowering radical Islam.”
That makes Trump appear to be something like a domestic terrorist. He has no business running for the White House, much less ever sitting in the Oval Office.

Trump calling a spade a spade. Trump exercising his First Amendment rights. Fortunately America is not governed by Sharia.

 

[The Guesser]

Trump calling a spade a spade. Trump exercising his First Amendment rights. Fortunately America is not governed by Sharia.

Yep, but under a Facist like Trump, the only thing 1st about the 1st amendment is that it will be the 1st one to go. And feeble minded idiots like you won't see it coming. What he is saying is helping ISIS and all Radical Islamic Groups. But you could care less while you're jacking to him and Putin.

 

[superbeets]

The Guesser
"He has no business running for the White House, much less ever sitting in the Oval Office"


Sorry to disappoint you, its known as democracy, and it is how it is, take your Sharia back with you to the lands of Muhammed where it belongs.

 

[The Guesser]

The Guesser
"He has no business running for the White House, much less ever sitting in the Oval Office"


Sorry to disappoint you, its known as democracy, and it is how it is, take your Sharia back with you to the lands of Muhammed where it belongs.

Idiot, I didn't say that, The KC Star Editorial eloquently stated it. You and your Sharia can go Fuck yourself when you're finished Fucking Your Trump and Putin Blow up Dolls, and passing them to the other sickos down here.

 

[The Guesser]

‘Trump Is White ISIS’: Daily Show Unloads on ‘Racist Maniac’ Trump

by Josh Feldman | 11:27 pm, December 8th, 2015
video 182

The Daily Show went all-out tonight absolutely savaging Donald Trump for his proposal for a Muslim entry ban. Trevor Noah said Trump has “evolved into a more gruesome form of himself” with this “flatly discriminatory” policy.
And what disturbs him the most isn’t that Trump is crazy, it’s that people are “following the crazy” and Trump is giving them permission to say plenty of insane, racist things.
But correspondent Hasan Minhaj, himself a Muslim, said Trump is absolutely right to keep Muslims out. Oh, not because they’re a danger, but because there’s a “racist maniac” on the loose.
And that was only the tip of the iceberg.
See, after a long explanation of how Trump’s “radical ideology” is trying to bring about a war between Islam and the West, he and Noah could only conclude one thing: “Donald Trump is white ISIS.”

Minhaj demanded that all the “moderate white conservatives” denounce Trump, saying that instead of appreciating the nuances of the ideology, “it’s just easier on my brain to be irrationally afraid of an entire group of people.”
Watch above, via Comedy Central.

 

[The Guesser]

Why Trump is playing right into ISIS' hands

By Jonathan Russell
Updated 4:15 AM ET, Wed December 9, 2015

Donald Trump defends Muslim ban proposal

MUST WATCH

Now Playing Donald Trump defends...

Source: CNN

Donald Trump defends Muslim ban proposal 01:09

Story highlights

• Donald Trump is wrong about the problem, but he is also wrong about the solution, writes Jonathan Russell
• Trump will contribute to Islamist radicalization, he says

Jonathan Russell is Head of Policy for the anti-radicalization think tank Quilliam. The views expressed in this commentary are solely those of the writer.

(CNN)With his comments, Donald Trump has confirmed that he is not a serious presidential candidate. If he were serious, he would know that preventing radicalization, extremism and terrorism is more important than soundbites, more complex than profiling, and more in need of a human rights-based approach than he seems able to contemplate.

America is hurting following the worst terrorist attack on its soil since 9/11. Trump knows he can exploit this hurt politically, and his advisers will have told him that when he talks tough, he polls well. Perhaps, then, it is more apt to say Trump is serious about winning an election, even if he is not serious about being president.

Trump defends Muslim ban proposal (Part 1) 08:48

Trump defends Muslim ban proposal (Part 2) 07:54

The next U.S. President must consider radicalization of American Muslims an important issue for U.S. national security and must admit that it is more complex than Muslim immigration. The online communications strategy of ISIS means that American Muslims, once less vulnerable to jihadist recruitment than their European counterparts, are now part of that terrorist group's target audience.
READ: The truth about Muslims in America
The recent paper by George Washington University's Program on Extremism, "ISIS in America," reveals more than 250 Americans sought to join ISIS and 56 individuals have been arrested this year for ISIS-related activities -- a vast increase on comparable terrorist activity in previous years.
Further inspection of "ISIS in America" shows why Trump is wrong not right. The former director of the FBI Robert S. Mueller III said that the biggest threat comes from "self-radicalized, homegrown extremists in the United States" and that is backed up with current statistics that shows the FBI currently has 900 ongoing investigations against homegrown violent Islamist extremists linked to ISIS.
In other words, the national security threat and the support for ISIS in America is not coming from immigration or from refugees, but from a disparate set of people who are willing to change their behavior because they buy into the Islamist worldview propagated by ISIS and other organizations.
Trump warns: 'Many more World Trade Centers'
Maajid Nawaz's cursory look at perpetrators of terrorism on American soil shows that the San Bernardino terrorists were unknown to the authorities and one of them was female, the Boston bombers were white and of Caucasian heritage, and the 9/11 attackers purposefully shaved off their beards, attended strip clubs, and drank alcohol on practice flights. None of these people would be caught by the profiling proposed by Trump.
So Trump is wrong about the problem. But he is also wrong about the solution. He must know that counter-extremism policy is more complex than profiling, which would not only fail to make America safer (or indeed great again), it would likely exacerbate the extremist problem itself. The negative consequences of getting counter-extremism policy wrong can exacerbate radicalization in three main ways.

First, Trump has become a champion for the American far-right and their anti-Muslim rhetoric. He makes the mood music to which white supremacists dance. Those with a propensity to violence need an atmosphere in which their views have become normalized, and violence has become considered an appropriate option to action those views.
If Trump were to get elected, due to the fact that profiling and discrimination on the grounds of religion are completely unconstitutional and un-American, he would be unable to deliver this particular election promise. This will leave many of his anti-Muslim supporters unfulfilled, disenfranchised and motivated to act unilaterally in opposition to Muslims and Islam. He therefore won't just increase anti-Muslim sentiment, his actions will also prompt more anti-Muslim violence.
Secondly, Trump will contribute to Islamist radicalization as his comments will make Muslims feel unwelcome in America. This grievance will fuel their identity crisis, which when combined are a potent combination for the vulnerability that ISIS is so adept at exploiting with their Islamist narrative. We must counter this narrative, but must avoid exacerbating this vulnerability too. ISIS thrives on the polarization of communities in Western countries and will be relishing a recruitment surge if Trump's rhetoric continues.
Thirdly, Trump dominates conversations. While electorally, this may mean that he gets more airtime than his fellow Republican nominees, in counter-extremism conversations, it means that progressive evidence-based counter-extremism policy gets drowned out. It means these counter-extremists get smeared with accusations of wanting the same outcome as Trump and means that the whole domain gets dragged to the far-right.
We counter-extremism practitioners know that religious and anti-religious extremists feed off each other, and are both best countered from the centre, with a firm human rights basis, yet this is roundly ignored by this "presidential troll."
Donald J Trump is not serious. But if we are serious about opposing ISIS, preventing radicalization of American Muslims, and making "America Great Again", we should be serious about keeping Trump out of the White House.

Jonathan Russell is Head of Policy for the anti-radicalization think tank Quilliam. The views expressed in this commentary are solely those of the writer.

 

[The Guesser]

 

[superbeets]

The Guesser.

However much what Trump says hurts you. It is something that is not practised in the lands of Muhammed, it is called democracy and the right of the First Amendment is paramount.

Take you Sharia and shove it through your anal sphincter, into your rectum,into your sigmoid colon, into your descending colon, into your transverse colon,into your ascending colon,into your caecum,into your ileum, into your jejunum,into your duodenum,into your stomach,into your oesophagus and finally out of your mouth into the toilet pan.

 

[Samhain]

Islam, by law, is prohibited from US immigration
​

The Immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27, 1952 revised the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality for the United States. That act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and the intent of Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today. Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in Chapter 2 Section 212, is the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by "force, violence, or other unconstitutional means." This, by its very definition, rules out Islamic immigration to the United States, but this law is being ignored by the White House.

The laws prohibits entry of "Aliens who the consular officer or the Attorney General knows or has reason to believe seek to enter the United States solely, principally, or incidentally to engage in activities which would be prejudicial to the public interest, or endanger the welfare, safety, or security of the United States." It also prohibits the entry of Aliens who are members of or affiliated with any organization that advocates or teaches, the overthrow by force, violence, or other unconstitutional means of the US or of all forms of law, and Aliens who publish, circulate and distribute materials teaching or advocating the overthrow by force, violence or other unconstitutional means of the US Government or of all forms of law.

Islamic immigration to the US would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law and the Hadith all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the US government, the Constitution, and to the Republic. All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their life's guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government. Now the political correct crowd would say that Islamists cannot be prohibited from entering the US because Islam is a religion. Whether it is a religion is immaterial because the law states that Aliens who are affiliated with any "organization" that advocates the overthrow of our government are prohibited. It also prohibits those who distribute literature that advocates the overthrow of our country, which would include the Koran.

In fact, there are many verses in the Koran that command Islamists to kill those who do not submit to allah and the prophet. If Congress so desired to hold the White House accountable to the current immigration of refugees (which also must comply with the law), it has the Immigration and Nationality Act to cite. The Administration is breaking that law. The question is "does Congress have the political will to do something about it?"

To read the law, go to this link and scroll down to Chapter 2, Section 212:
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE...E-66-Pg163.pdf

 

[MantisToboggan]

When the statement comes from a known moron, you're goddamn right it sound serious. Just like ignoring roadrunner's massive lie about the attendance at a rally and focusing on a typo also makes you a hypocrite AND a fucking idiot.

Ha, that's rich coming from a dumb fuck who can't handle elementary school math and posts satire as breaking news (no surprise you took my old, white, conservative males in internment camps as serious as well).

 

[neverbend]

Yikes- so if you had the choice between Al-Bagdadi & Trump you'd choose the former!
Your a real oddball aren't you! Please help Trump 'Make America great again' by leaving
for another land as soon as Trump takes the helm, & when you leave be considerate enough
to bring with you a peace loving Muslim under very arm!

 

[superbeets]

'Trump's not wrong - we can't even wear uniform in our OWN cars': Five police officers claim US tycoon is RIGHT about parts of London being so 'radicalised' they are no-go areas

Officers from the Met have said 'Islamification' of the capital is 'real' and revealed they do need to be 'extra vigilant' in some areas and even abandon using uniforms. The US presidential contender Donald Trump has caused worldwide consternation after a string of incendiary remarks about Muslims, including in Britain when he said: 'We have places in that are so radicalised that police are afraid for their own lives.' But backing his claims a serving officer said today: 'Trump's not wrong. He pointed out something that is plainly obvious, something which I think we aren't as a nation willing to own up to'. It came as more than 200,000 people signed a petition demanding the tycoon is banned from Britain for being a 'hate preacher'.



Serving police officers today backed Donald Trump's claim that some Muslim communities in the UK are no-go areas because of extremism.
Several Met officers have said 'Islamification' of the capital means they must be 'extra vigilant' and can't wear uniforms for safety reasons - despite Scotland Yard claiming the tycoon 'couldn't be more wrong'.




Yesterday the US presidential contender caused worldwide consternation after a string of incendiary remarks about Muslims, including in Britain, and said: 'We have places in London and other places that are so radicalised that police are afraid for their own lives.'
But one serving officer said today Trump 'pointed out something plainly obvious, something which I think we aren't as a nation willing to own up to'.
Another policeman said that he and other colleagues fear being terror targets and spoke of the 'dire warning' from bosses not to wear a uniform 'even in my own car'.


A Lancashire Police officer told MailOnline: 'There are Muslim areas of Preston that, if we wish to patrol, we have to contact local Muslim community leaders to get their permission'.



One officer from Yorkshire said on the online forum Police.Community: 'I'm not allowed to travel in half blues to work anymore IN MY OWN CAR as we're "All at risk of attack" - yet as soon as someone points out the obvious it's 'divisive.'
He added: 'In this instance he (Trump) isn't wrong. Our political leaders are best either ill-informed or simply being disingenuous.
'He's pointed out something that is plainly obvious, something which I think we aren't as a nation willing to own up to - do you think a US Police Department would ban officers from wearing their uniforms under jackets etc due to FEAR of their cops being killed by extremists?
'We implement half measures such as "No-one is allowed to come into work half blues, even in your own cars because if you get beheaded it'll be your own fault.
'It would be seen as un-American, un-democratic, not the done thing... In the UK though we accept it'.




One female officer in the Met said if a police officer was attacked it would be written off.
She said: 'Even if one of us did get killed or dragged off in a van. It would just be reported as a "one-off incident" and no reason to change the 'British style of policing.'



Another Met officer who resigned this year said: 'I was a PC in the Met for 11 years - I resigned as I couldn't handle it anymore
'Whilst provocative Trump's comments does carry some weight. PCs are not permitted to even come to work in "half Blues" (just wearing trousers and shirt) for fear of attack whilst going to work. That is a directive from Scotland Yard.
'PCs have come out to find police cars having the brake lines cut and sometimes their own personal cars damaged'.
Another serving police officer agreed and said: 'Same here regarding the dire warnings of wearing half blues even in my own car and I'm not in London'.

 

[Dave007inVegas]

As Graham aptly noted, “He is helping the enemy of this nation. He is empowering radical Islam.”
That makes Trump appear to be something like a domestic terrorist. He has no business running for the White House, much less ever sitting in the Oval Office.


This from a guy who is currently polling at 0.

 

[superbeets]

In 2014 Tom Winsor, Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Constabulary, caused a row when he claimed minority communities had turned their back on police.
He told The Times: 'There are some communities born under other skies who will not involve police at all.
'I am reluctant to name the communities in question but there are communities from other cultures who would prefer to police themselves.
'There are cities in the Midlands where the police never go because they are never called. They never hear of any trouble because the community deals with that on its own. They just have their own form of community justice'.
Mr Winsor said some forces get 'close to zero' calls in some areas.
He said: 'They don't know what injustices are being perpetrated. It's almost a closed book because we can't go there so don't know. It could be anything from low-level crime right up to murder are the most extreme example. That is murder. There is no honour in it.'

 

[superbeets]

• SHARE PICTURE

​

+8


Sit down: Donald Trump said in an interview with Barbara Walters on Tuesday he is not a bigot and does not regret his proposed ban on Muslims

+8


Explanation: He also said he has 'tremendous relationships' with many Muslims who completely agree with him on this issue

Picking fights: Mr Trump also took the time to call his critics 'foolish' on Twitter

Doubling down: He continued to talk about his plan and how important it was on Twitter Tuesday

 

[neverbend]

What are the limits on these props?

For all scalpers good scalp if you have money in 5D & Bookmaker on Republican nomination!

Bookmaker Trump to win +400
5 Dimes Field to win -335

 

[Dave007inVegas]

Why Obama wants Muslims to come to America.


Muslims are the fast growing religious group in the world, with 23 percent of the global population, and will take over Christianity as the top religion by the end of the century, according to Pew Research Center.


A review of Muslims by the nonpartisan organization also found that Muslims comprise a growing share of the immigrants granted permanent residency in the United States each year. Their share doubled from 5 percent of the annual permanent residency flow in 1992 to 10 percent in 2012, representing 100,000 Muslim immigrants granted permanent residency in the U.S. each year.


Pew also found that Muslim immigrants prefer more government services and that 70 percent lean Democratic. Just 11 percent identify with Republicans.

 

[The Guesser]

Yikes- so if you had the choice between Al-Bagdadi & Trump you'd choose the former!
Your a real oddball aren't you! Please help Trump 'Make America great again' by leaving
for another land as soon as Trump takes the helm, & when you leave be considerate enough
to bring with you a peace loving Muslim under very arm!

And you get this nonsense from??? Nazi's and ISIS are cut from the same cloth. Trump is a Nazi, and you will make a great Nazi, only following orders, not having the courage or guts to question the dreadful, unconstitutional, racist things he's saying.