[h=6]- AUGUST 01, 2016 -[/h][h=1]TRUMP GOOD FOR JEWS, ISRAEL AND AMERICA[/h]Atlanta Jewish Times
"There are three major reasons why Donald Trump is the best candidate for Jews, Israel and America: He will secure the borders to stop illegal immigration, fight Islamic terror, and assist Israel in negotiating her own peace deal with Palestinians, not imposing a solution."
Donald Trump is dedicated to these three important issues, which is why he is the best candidate for us all. He will support Israel in negotiations and will make sure that their protection is secured just like it is in our country. Hillary Clinton supports policies that will compromise the safety of America and all her allies, not just for Jews, but for all Americans.
The answer to who to vote for seems very simple.
"There are three major reasons why Donald Trump is the best candidate for Jews, Israel and America: He will secure the borders to stop illegal immigration, fight Islamic terror, and assist Israel in negotiating her own peace deal with Palestinians, not imposing a solution."
Donald Trump is dedicated to these three important issues, which is why he is the best candidate for us all. He will support Israel in negotiations and will make sure that their protection is secured just like it is in our country. Hillary Clinton supports policies that will compromise the safety of America and all her allies, not just for Jews, but for all Americans.
The answer to who to vote for seems very simple.
[h=6]- AUGUST 01, 2016 -[/h]
[h=1]STATEMENT ON CLINTON FOUNDATION’S TIES TO CORPORATION FUNDING ISIS[/h]
“More than any major presidential nominee in modern history, Hillary Clinton is tied to brutal theocratic and Islamist regimes. Now we learn she has accepted money from a company linked to ISIS. All the while, she refuses to tell the truth about radical Islam's war against people of different beliefs, lifestyles and values.” – Stephen Miller, Senior Policy Advisor
The Clinton Foundation Received Money From A Company That Struck A Deal With ISIS To Continue Operating A Cement Works In Syria:
The Clinton Foundation Has Received Between $50,001 And $100,000 From Lafarge.(“Contributor And Grantor Information,” Clinton Foundation, Accessed 8/1/16)
According To Le Monde, Lafarge “Entered Into Deals With Armed Groups In Syria, Including The Islamic State (IS) Group, In Order To Protect Its Business Interests In The Country.” “French cement maker Lafarge entered into deals with armed groups in Syria, including the Islamic State (IS) group, in order to protect its business interests in the country, French daily Le Monde reported Tuesday.” (“French Cement Maker Lafarge 'Made Deals With IS Group In Syria',” France 24, 6/22/16)
The Deal With ISIS Centers On A Cement Works Lafarge Purchased In Syria In 2007. “At the heart of the ‘murky deals’ alleged by Le Monde is a cement works that Lafarge bought in 2007 some 150 kilometres (95 miles) northeast of Aleppo. The Jalabiya cement works went into operation in 2010, a year before the start of Syria's ongoing civil war.” (“French Cement Maker Lafarge 'Made Deals With IS Group In Syria',” France 24, 6/22/16)
Lafarge Purchased Licenses And Paid Taxes To ISIS To Allow For Access To Its Syrian Cement Works And The “Free Circulation Of Its Goods.” “In one case Lafarge – seeking access to its factory for workers and supplies – sent a man named Ahmad Jaloudi on a mission ‘to get permission from IS group to let employees past checkpoints.’ … In another case a ‘pass stamped with an IS group stamp and endorsed by the (group's) finance chief in the Aleppo region’ proves the company had struck a deal with IS group to allow for free circulation of its goods, the newspaper reported. In order to keep making cement Lafarge bought licenses from and paid taxes to IS group middle-men and oil traders, the newspaper alleged.” (“French Cement Maker Lafarge 'Made Deals With IS Group In Syria',” France 24, 6/22/16)
[h=1]STATEMENT ON CLINTON FOUNDATION’S TIES TO CORPORATION FUNDING ISIS[/h]
“More than any major presidential nominee in modern history, Hillary Clinton is tied to brutal theocratic and Islamist regimes. Now we learn she has accepted money from a company linked to ISIS. All the while, she refuses to tell the truth about radical Islam's war against people of different beliefs, lifestyles and values.” – Stephen Miller, Senior Policy Advisor
The Clinton Foundation Received Money From A Company That Struck A Deal With ISIS To Continue Operating A Cement Works In Syria:
The Clinton Foundation Has Received Between $50,001 And $100,000 From Lafarge.(“Contributor And Grantor Information,” Clinton Foundation, Accessed 8/1/16)
According To Le Monde, Lafarge “Entered Into Deals With Armed Groups In Syria, Including The Islamic State (IS) Group, In Order To Protect Its Business Interests In The Country.” “French cement maker Lafarge entered into deals with armed groups in Syria, including the Islamic State (IS) group, in order to protect its business interests in the country, French daily Le Monde reported Tuesday.” (“French Cement Maker Lafarge 'Made Deals With IS Group In Syria',” France 24, 6/22/16)
The Deal With ISIS Centers On A Cement Works Lafarge Purchased In Syria In 2007. “At the heart of the ‘murky deals’ alleged by Le Monde is a cement works that Lafarge bought in 2007 some 150 kilometres (95 miles) northeast of Aleppo. The Jalabiya cement works went into operation in 2010, a year before the start of Syria's ongoing civil war.” (“French Cement Maker Lafarge 'Made Deals With IS Group In Syria',” France 24, 6/22/16)
Lafarge Purchased Licenses And Paid Taxes To ISIS To Allow For Access To Its Syrian Cement Works And The “Free Circulation Of Its Goods.” “In one case Lafarge – seeking access to its factory for workers and supplies – sent a man named Ahmad Jaloudi on a mission ‘to get permission from IS group to let employees past checkpoints.’ … In another case a ‘pass stamped with an IS group stamp and endorsed by the (group's) finance chief in the Aleppo region’ proves the company had struck a deal with IS group to allow for free circulation of its goods, the newspaper reported. In order to keep making cement Lafarge bought licenses from and paid taxes to IS group middle-men and oil traders, the newspaper alleged.” (“French Cement Maker Lafarge 'Made Deals With IS Group In Syria',” France 24, 6/22/16)
PAGE likes?!?! ROTFLMAO!!!!!! how the fuck are you able to find your way home at night, Lying Lummox? I notice you didn't have much to say when I exposed Rump as a liar for saying HE blew off the Koch brothers(uh, other way around), a whole SHITLOAD of lies about Putin, and now being left with egg on his face after being exposed by the NFL. Fucking moron...
'She's the devil!': Trump goes all-in on bashing Hillary as he says Bernie Sanders 'made a deal with the devil' by endorsing her
NEW
Donald Trump called his Democratic rival 'the devil' on Monday in a high-profile escalation of his campaign rhetoric - at precisely the moment he needed to change the subject. Facing a four-day-long scandal over his criticism of the father of a Muslim soldier who died in combat, the Republican presidential nominee shifted gears. Sen. Bernie Sanders, Trump told an overflow crowd at a high school in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, 'made a deal with the devil' when he endorsed Clinton at last week's Democratic National Convention. 'She's the devil!' he added.
Donald Trump called his Democratic rival 'the devil' on Monday in a high-profile escalation of his campaign rhetoric - at precisely the moment he needed to change the subject. Facing a four-day-long scandal over his criticism of the father of a Muslim soldier who died in combat, the Republican presidential nominee shifted gears. Sen. Bernie Sanders, Trump told an overflow crowd at a high school in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, 'made a deal with the devil' when he endorsed Clinton at last week's Democratic National Convention. 'She's the devil!' he added.
'She's the devil!': Trump goes all-in on bashing Hillary as he says Bernie Sanders 'made a deal with the devil' by endorsing her
+4
'SHE'S THE DEVIL!': Donald Trump went all-in on Monday night as he said that when Bernie Sanders made an endorsement 'deal with the devil,' Hillary Clinton was the Satan figure
+4
DOES SHE WEAR PRADA? Friday may mark the first time in modern election history that one major-party nominee has called the other Satan
+4
DEAL WITH HER: Trump said Bernie Sanders made a 'deal with the devil' when he agreed to endorse Hillary Clinton during last week's Democratic National Convention
+4
NOT THE FIRST: Ben Carson connected Clinton to Beelzebub last month, saying at the Republican National Convention that her mentor Saul Alinsky had dedicated his book 'Rules for Radicals' to Lucifer
And Dr. Ben Carson, who may run the Department of Health and Human Services in a Trump administration, tried to tie Clinton to the devil two weeks ago during his Republican National Convention speech.
The former secretary of state, Carson said, was a disciple of far-left activist Saul Alinsky – who dedicated his book 'Rules for Radicals' to 'Lucifer, the original radical who gained his own kingdom.'
Cruz reacts to Boehner's 'Lucifer in the flesh' insult
Progress: 0%
0:00
Play
Mute
Need Text
- Donald Trump said during a Pennsylvania rally that Bernie Sanders 'made a deal with the devil' by agreeing to endorse Hillary Clinton last week
- 'She's the devil!' he boomed
- Trump isn't the first politician to go there this year; former House Speaker John Boehner called Ted Cruz 'Lucifer in the flesh' in April
- Sanders' campaign manager had said it was Hillary who 'made a deal with the devil' by accepting millions of dollars from Wall Street donors
- SHARE PICTURE
+4
'SHE'S THE DEVIL!': Donald Trump went all-in on Monday night as he said that when Bernie Sanders made an endorsement 'deal with the devil,' Hillary Clinton was the Satan figure
+4
DOES SHE WEAR PRADA? Friday may mark the first time in modern election history that one major-party nominee has called the other Satan
+4
DEAL WITH HER: Trump said Bernie Sanders made a 'deal with the devil' when he agreed to endorse Hillary Clinton during last week's Democratic National Convention
- Dr. Ben Carson said during the Republican National Convention that Hillary Clinton's mentor Saul Alinsky dedicated his book to Lucifer
- SHARE PICTURE
+4
NOT THE FIRST: Ben Carson connected Clinton to Beelzebub last month, saying at the Republican National Convention that her mentor Saul Alinsky had dedicated his book 'Rules for Radicals' to Lucifer
And Dr. Ben Carson, who may run the Department of Health and Human Services in a Trump administration, tried to tie Clinton to the devil two weeks ago during his Republican National Convention speech.
The former secretary of state, Carson said, was a disciple of far-left activist Saul Alinsky – who dedicated his book 'Rules for Radicals' to 'Lucifer, the original radical who gained his own kingdom.'
Cruz reacts to Boehner's 'Lucifer in the flesh' insult
Loaded: 0%Progress: 0%
0:00
Play
Mute
Current Time0:00
/
Duration Time1:22
Fullscreen/
Duration Time1:22
Need Text
HaHa...Gawd damn...You are supposed to be a fucking man in at least his 50's and you fucking post facebook shit here like it is some kind of badge of honor...How many times do you need to be called out on it? No disrespect and I mean it,but you may have a fucking screw loose and a problem interacting with people in a normal way because you believe in this facebook shit so much...Regardless what you think,this is not normal for anyone over the age of 16...Do you really think facebook likes mean anything?How in the hell have we fallen so far in society when people actually think like that/
A star (or stars) and crescent featuring in some combination form the basis of symbols widely found across the ancient world, with examples attested from the Eastern Mediterranean, Persia andCentral Asia.[SUP][
[/SUP]
The symbol emerged into popular use during the 19th century as a modernistic national symbol for the Ottoman Empire during the Westernizing Tanzimat reforms.
The Ottoman flag of 1844 with a white "ay-yıldız" (Turkish for "crescent-star") on a red background continues to be in use as the flag of the Republic of Turkey with minor modifications.
Other states formerly part of the Ottoman Empire also used the symbol, including Libya (1951–1969 and after 2011), Tunisia (1956) and Algeria (1958).
The same symbol was used in other national flags introduced during the 20th century, including the flags of Azerbaijan (1918), Pakistan (1947), Malaysia (1948), and Mauritania (1959).
During the 1950s to 1960s, the symbol was re-interpreted as the symbol of Islam or the Muslim community.
By the 1970s, this symbolism was embraced by movements of Arab nationalism orIslamism, such as the proposed Arab Islamic Republic (1974) and the American Nation of Islam (1973).
Again, when Gallup says a Repub sucks, that's pretty bad-here, the first time since they began recording such things that a candidate when DOWN after his convention, lol, and it's not gonna improve after his hilariously stupid decision to go after the family whose son was killed:
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/poll-clinton-trump-dnc-2016-226507
[h=1]Gallup: Trump support tumbles after conventions[/h] By Nolan D. McCaskill
08/01/16 12:03 PM EDT
Updated 08/01/16 12:45 PM EDT
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/poll-clinton-trump-dnc-2016-226507
[h=1]Gallup: Trump support tumbles after conventions[/h] By Nolan D. McCaskill
08/01/16 12:03 PM EDT
Updated 08/01/16 12:45 PM EDT
In the wake of the Republican and Democratic national conventions, voters are more likely to support Hillary Clinton than Donald Trump, according to a Gallup poll released Monday.
While 36 percent of adults are more likely to support Trump coming out of the GOP’s four-day event, 51 percent are less likely to vote for the real estate mogul afterit. The minus-15 net rating is the worst mark for the Republican nominee coming out of the party’s convention since Gallup began asking the question in 1984, though the 1984 and 1992 GOP conventions were excluded.
Last month’s Republican convention, however, is the only time respondents were overall less likely to vote for the candidate who was nominated. Previous lows for the Republican nominee were plus-2 with Mitt Romney in 2012 and plus-3 with President George W. Bush in 2004.
The convention has also shaped the views of the Republican Party. Fifty-two percent of those surveyed said they have a less favorable view of the GOP now, while 35 percent see the party more favorably.
After the Democratic convention, 45 percent of adults said they were more likely to back Clinton, though 41 percent said they’re now less likely to do so. While the percentage of respondents more inclined to vote for Clinton coming out of the convention is on par for Democratic nominees over the past two decades, the 41 percent who are less likely to vote for Clinton represents the highest mark since 1984.
Respondents were split on how the convention affected their overall view of the Democratic Party: Forty-four percent have a more favorable opinion of the party, while 42 percent see it less favorably.
While 36 percent of adults are more likely to support Trump coming out of the GOP’s four-day event, 51 percent are less likely to vote for the real estate mogul afterit. The minus-15 net rating is the worst mark for the Republican nominee coming out of the party’s convention since Gallup began asking the question in 1984, though the 1984 and 1992 GOP conventions were excluded.
Last month’s Republican convention, however, is the only time respondents were overall less likely to vote for the candidate who was nominated. Previous lows for the Republican nominee were plus-2 with Mitt Romney in 2012 and plus-3 with President George W. Bush in 2004.
The convention has also shaped the views of the Republican Party. Fifty-two percent of those surveyed said they have a less favorable view of the GOP now, while 35 percent see the party more favorably.
After the Democratic convention, 45 percent of adults said they were more likely to back Clinton, though 41 percent said they’re now less likely to do so. While the percentage of respondents more inclined to vote for Clinton coming out of the convention is on par for Democratic nominees over the past two decades, the 41 percent who are less likely to vote for Clinton represents the highest mark since 1984.
Respondents were split on how the convention affected their overall view of the Democratic Party: Forty-four percent have a more favorable opinion of the party, while 42 percent see it less favorably.
Along party lines, 81 percent of Democrats and those who lean Democratic — and 8 percent of Republicans and GOP leaners — said they were more likely to back Clinton after the Democratic convention. But only 73 percent of Republicans and leaners — and just 2 percent of Democrats — are more likely to vote for Trump coming out of the Republican convention.
Trump thanked “everyone for the wonderful reviews” of his speech and slammed Clinton’s “very long and very boring speech.” But Gallup’s results suggest the billionaire’s remarks were the worst-received in the past 20 years.
The response to Trump’s acceptance speech yielded similar results on opposite ends of the spectrum. While 18 percent said his speech was just OK, 35 percent thought it was excellent or good — the lowest percentage since ’96 — and 36 percent thought it was poor or terrible — the highest percentage since '96.
Forty-four percent of respondents said Clinton’s speech accepting her historic nomination was excellent or good. Two-in-10 said it was poor or terrible, and 17 percent thought it was just OK.
The Gallup poll of 1,000 adults was conducted July 23-24 and July 29-30, immediately after each convention, via landlines and cellphones. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.
Trump thanked “everyone for the wonderful reviews” of his speech and slammed Clinton’s “very long and very boring speech.” But Gallup’s results suggest the billionaire’s remarks were the worst-received in the past 20 years.
The response to Trump’s acceptance speech yielded similar results on opposite ends of the spectrum. While 18 percent said his speech was just OK, 35 percent thought it was excellent or good — the lowest percentage since ’96 — and 36 percent thought it was poor or terrible — the highest percentage since '96.
Forty-four percent of respondents said Clinton’s speech accepting her historic nomination was excellent or good. Two-in-10 said it was poor or terrible, and 17 percent thought it was just OK.
The Gallup poll of 1,000 adults was conducted July 23-24 and July 29-30, immediately after each convention, via landlines and cellphones. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.
:laughingb
