when it's from someone with whom I am consistently at odds on issues.
This is true. But one sign of intellectual decadence is the need to insult the other "side". I certainly don't believe in this type of dialectic, and even though sometimes we are all guilty of it, it should not be our goal to strive toward an oxymoron (i.e., intelletual decay or decadence).
This is true. But one sign of intellectual decadence is the need to insult the other "side". I certainly don't believe in this type of dialectic, and even though sometimes we are all guilty of it, it should not be our goal to strive toward an oxymoron (i.e., intelletual decay or decadence).
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Jesus Lander - you're a bigger idiot than Radiofree - you sound like a salesman in a used car lot - one lie after another. I had some respect for you starting this string - now I see you for the liar you are.
I won't go away mad - I'll just ignore you!<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Cripes man, 4 posts after the post on ad hominem attacks!
I won't go away mad - I'll just ignore you!<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Cripes man, 4 posts after the post on ad hominem attacks!
Ok Billy, I told you that you're wrong on calling me a "lib" ... so now I'm the idiot? you're the one with the "fact" all reversed. But hey, if changing the focus of my post makes you feel less stupid then by all means
btw - my favorite Bill Blight momement has to be when he said that all the eductors vote dem, but all the dem libs are idiots ...
.. let's see - USA has the best universities, thus implying the best educators, thus implying the most educated are the educators & those educated by the educators - whom you said all vote dem, but now the dems are all idiots
alright billy, no need to call names just because you're not amongst the most educated populous
btw - my favorite Bill Blight momement has to be when he said that all the eductors vote dem, but all the dem libs are idiots ...
.. let's see - USA has the best universities, thus implying the best educators, thus implying the most educated are the educators & those educated by the educators - whom you said all vote dem, but now the dems are all idiots
alright billy, no need to call names just because you're not amongst the most educated populous
Radiofree
first you say: "they're the ones who sent us ther
Nixon was a "dem"??????"
Then you say: "Yes yes...I know.
Thanks for schooling the "schooled".
Now, please tell me this: Are the troubles that happen in an administration entirely the president's doing?"
You obviously need to be schooled since you were trying to blame Vietnam on President Nixon. What I see here is more of the party line lies!
Now, please tell me this - when are you going to quit spouting the party line and start showing some original thought?
first you say: "they're the ones who sent us ther
Nixon was a "dem"??????"
Then you say: "Yes yes...I know.
Thanks for schooling the "schooled".
Now, please tell me this: Are the troubles that happen in an administration entirely the president's doing?"
You obviously need to be schooled since you were trying to blame Vietnam on President Nixon. What I see here is more of the party line lies!
Now, please tell me this - when are you going to quit spouting the party line and start showing some original thought?
Lander - You say you aren't a liberal - yet you toe the party line with every line you write. You can say the sky is pink, but I'll call it blue if you don't mind.
It seems to me that you put spin on everything - negative spin on posts that go against the party line and positive spin on posts that go for the party line.
You twist the meaning of a statement that someone makes, and attempt to have it seem as though it mean something else.
You try to act in a superior, elitist manner - as though you are the expert on what it is all about.
These are all party line tactics - right out of the DNC and the old Kremlin.
I will continue to point out that "If it ain't the truth, it's a lie!" I haven't seen much of the truth from you, only twisting of the facts - and in my book, that makes you a liar!
It seems to me that you put spin on everything - negative spin on posts that go against the party line and positive spin on posts that go for the party line.
You twist the meaning of a statement that someone makes, and attempt to have it seem as though it mean something else.
You try to act in a superior, elitist manner - as though you are the expert on what it is all about.
These are all party line tactics - right out of the DNC and the old Kremlin.
I will continue to point out that "If it ain't the truth, it's a lie!" I haven't seen much of the truth from you, only twisting of the facts - and in my book, that makes you a liar!
Originally posted by bblight:
Lander - You say you aren't a liberal - yet you toe the party line with every line you write.
Wrong again Billy, this make 5 straight FALSE posts addressed to me. If you have read my posts you will also see that I am clearly against Abortion (a liberal must), against gay marriages (another liberal must). You have ZERO idea how to comprehend anything except black and white, so the first time someone disagrees with your-sorry-self you label them as "liberal dems" ... as if the false label strengthens your usually suspect arguments. You further proceed to call ANYONE that's not 100% Converative Republican a "liar". You're hopeless Billy, hopeless.
You can say the sky is pink, but I'll call it blue if you don't mind.
Is this is the core of your argument?
I fell as if I'm talking with a 3 year-old that say "no it's not" to everying.
It seems to me that you put spin on everything - negative spin on posts that go against the party line and positive spin on posts that go for the party line.
What have a spun jerky?
I commended Bush for not legalizing gay mariages, I commended him for his *initial* response to 9/11 .. but he has done NOTHING else worthy of high praise since. He is destroying the economy with his delusional approach with "America's Budget - the Big fuking Credit Card", he's engaging in unproked, unnecessary, evil wars that we CANNOT afford. Wtf do you expect? I didn't praise Clinton for Bosnia or for making a circus out of the Lewinsky ordeal. Get over yourself and you silly bi-partisian thinking Bill, there exists a large majority between Bush & Clinton that you're either too blind, or frankly too stupid to acknowledge.
I will continue to point out that "If it ain't the truth, it's a lie!" I haven't seen much of the truth from you, only twisting of the facts - and in my book, that makes you a liar!
Whatever, more senseless rhetoric. I will take pride in knowing that NEITHER of states will be voting to GWB in 11/04 & knowing that imps like will continue to sulk through the entire process.
Lander - You say you aren't a liberal - yet you toe the party line with every line you write.
Wrong again Billy, this make 5 straight FALSE posts addressed to me. If you have read my posts you will also see that I am clearly against Abortion (a liberal must), against gay marriages (another liberal must). You have ZERO idea how to comprehend anything except black and white, so the first time someone disagrees with your-sorry-self you label them as "liberal dems" ... as if the false label strengthens your usually suspect arguments. You further proceed to call ANYONE that's not 100% Converative Republican a "liar". You're hopeless Billy, hopeless.
You can say the sky is pink, but I'll call it blue if you don't mind.
Is this is the core of your argument?
It seems to me that you put spin on everything - negative spin on posts that go against the party line and positive spin on posts that go for the party line.
What have a spun jerky?
I will continue to point out that "If it ain't the truth, it's a lie!" I haven't seen much of the truth from you, only twisting of the facts - and in my book, that makes you a liar!
Whatever, more senseless rhetoric. I will take pride in knowing that NEITHER of states will be voting to GWB in 11/04 & knowing that imps like will continue to sulk through the entire process.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by bblight:
More original thinking from your local left wing ideologue! Thank you Lander for proving my point!<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Billy H. Blight,
I'm not left wing, idiot
Seriously, wtf does it take to get something through your dense unless skull?
Thank God the rest of Mass will overshadow your incompetence next November.
PMS,
Must your-faggy-self stalk me across the entire forum? How many times have you said "I'm not responding to Lander anymore"
only to stalk me down 2.037 minutes later
More original thinking from your local left wing ideologue! Thank you Lander for proving my point!<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Billy H. Blight,
I'm not left wing, idiot
Seriously, wtf does it take to get something through your dense unless skull?
Thank God the rest of Mass will overshadow your incompetence next November.
PMS,
Must your-faggy-self stalk me across the entire forum? How many times have you said "I'm not responding to Lander anymore"
Actually, I've been coughing all day ...
I figure it's either
A. Common Cold
B. SARS
C. Part a biological terrorist attacked that will destroy America
In case I die tonight, I'm willing you my avatar
Ok, enough "debate" for today - I actually have to do some work around this joint. My boss doesn't want me gambling or some other facsist bs
what a prick ..
I figure it's either
A. Common Cold
B. SARS
C. Part a biological terrorist attacked that will destroy America
In case I die tonight, I'm willing you my avatar
Ok, enough "debate" for today - I actually have to do some work around this joint. My boss doesn't want me gambling or some other facsist bs
Igetp2s,
Name calling is what the liberals resort to when they're losing. They'll attempt to demean and shame you into losing control. Nazi is their usual favorite, but there are a host of other epithets your average left winger will resort to when frustrated.
What I really love about your average gutter level liberal is their zealotry in toeing the party line - the agenda just doesn't change. It's always the same thing - raising taxes, more give away programs - to people whio don't need them, more jobs for the liberal hacks who run these programs; etc., etc..
They also need someone to hate - back in the 70's it was Nixon, until Ronnie came along. Then after Ronnie left the stage in a very classy way, it was Newt - and after Newt it was Trent; now it's Bush the second - and have you noticed that these people are always reviled the same way - as uncaring rich people who will starve the elderly and needy - when the truth is, the programs they cut will force a liberal off of the government largesse and into a job in the dreaded private sector.
Take a good look at one of the ultimate liberal liars, rich boy Howard Dean who comes from a long line of stock brokers - when this guy ran for governor of Vermont, his motto was "Vermont for a change" - and Vermont did change - into a Republican stronghold! You can see bumper stickers in Vermont in obvious parody of New Hampshires "live free or die" - they say "live free or Dean"
Anyways, this guy, Dean is running as a Democrat Centrist - and you can't get any further to the left than this guy. Vermont legalized gay unions under his administration.
Waht I don't understand is how Lander can say that he isn't a liberal when it's as plain as the typing in this post!
Name calling is what the liberals resort to when they're losing. They'll attempt to demean and shame you into losing control. Nazi is their usual favorite, but there are a host of other epithets your average left winger will resort to when frustrated.
What I really love about your average gutter level liberal is their zealotry in toeing the party line - the agenda just doesn't change. It's always the same thing - raising taxes, more give away programs - to people whio don't need them, more jobs for the liberal hacks who run these programs; etc., etc..
They also need someone to hate - back in the 70's it was Nixon, until Ronnie came along. Then after Ronnie left the stage in a very classy way, it was Newt - and after Newt it was Trent; now it's Bush the second - and have you noticed that these people are always reviled the same way - as uncaring rich people who will starve the elderly and needy - when the truth is, the programs they cut will force a liberal off of the government largesse and into a job in the dreaded private sector.
Take a good look at one of the ultimate liberal liars, rich boy Howard Dean who comes from a long line of stock brokers - when this guy ran for governor of Vermont, his motto was "Vermont for a change" - and Vermont did change - into a Republican stronghold! You can see bumper stickers in Vermont in obvious parody of New Hampshires "live free or die" - they say "live free or Dean"
Anyways, this guy, Dean is running as a Democrat Centrist - and you can't get any further to the left than this guy. Vermont legalized gay unions under his administration.
Waht I don't understand is how Lander can say that he isn't a liberal when it's as plain as the typing in this post!
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Name calling is what the liberals resort to when they're losing. They'll attempt to demean and shame you into losing control.
What I really love about your average gutter level liberal is their zealotry in toeing the party line - the <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Is there anything lower than a hypocrite, a self-proven liar if you will?
What I really love about your average gutter level liberal is their zealotry in toeing the party line - the <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I find it ironic that bblight lives in Mass., perhaps one of the most liberal states in the union.
My question remains valid: Is the president to blame for every problem that occurs while he is in office?
Nixon was not a democrat, my point exactly, and he tried but failed to put a quick end to the Vietnam War.
Efforts are worthless in the realm of politics. You either succeed or you fail. I will not congratulate a failure, nor should we.
My question remains valid: Is the president to blame for every problem that occurs while he is in office?
Nixon was not a democrat, my point exactly, and he tried but failed to put a quick end to the Vietnam War.
Efforts are worthless in the realm of politics. You either succeed or you fail. I will not congratulate a failure, nor should we.
