wil,
I know you have nothing against me,
as you know I am a big proponent of the WA philosophy.... (I have started threads on this & the ethics of being a forum capper). Recently my comments preceded a STICKY you posted in the sports forums....
that being said, obviously, every sharp capper is gonna shop for the best available line.... it is common sense & the responsibility of every sharp capper to do so. So in a situation where 8 out of 10 books have a total of 51.5 & 2 of 10 have a total of 52.... IMO obviously my play would be 52 if I liked the UNDER, & posting a line of 52 IMO is not an exageration or an abuse, & in my books the capper should get credit for the WA philosophy.
FWIW, SIA currently has 52 on that game, not to mention every other line posted in ACE's thread is within the norm....
It is stretching a bit to claim that 52 in that game is not a WA number & did not deserve a disruption in the thread, IMO.
unless of course I am missing something?