She has been involved in govt for decades.....she was in the White House for 8 years.....she was a senator and Secretary of State. Of course she has an incredible grasp on the issues. That's really not even debatable. You might not agree with her decisions but whether she knows this shit front and back.....it's obvious that she does.
Now, I've answered your question.... You didn't answer mine and I know that's usually the case her but I will try again
does it matter to you that a non partisan group selected these debate dates back in September of 2015? Don't you think that makes this thread ridiculously idiotic?
http://www.debates.org/index.php?page=2016debates
Our Mission
The Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) was established in 1987 to ensure that debates, as a permanent part of every general election, provide the best possible information to viewers and listeners. Its primary purpose is to sponsor and produce debates for the United States presidential and vice presidential candidates and to undertake research and educational activities relating to the debates. The organization, which is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, 501(c)(3) corporation, sponsored all of the presidential debates in 1988, 1992, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008, and 2012.
Our Mission
The Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) was established in 1987 to ensure that debates, as a permanent part of every general election, provide the best possible information to viewers and listeners. Its primary purpose is to sponsor and produce debates for the United States presidential and vice presidential candidates and to undertake research and educational activities relating to the debates. The organization, which is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, 501(c)(3) corporation, sponsored all of the presidential debates in 1988, 1992, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008, and 2012.
Her debate skills are fine.....the people who already dislike her will just say that because of personal feelings towards her.
You think Clinton pushed for debate dates out of fear of an unknown candidate? And they sat in a room and said....lets go for that saints/ Falcons game.....we need to hide from those people in new orl and Atlanta. You gotta see how silly that sounds. Maybe if you said it out loud a light might go on.
She is more knowledgeable than Trump on the issues but she gets all "finger nails clawing a chalk board" sounding when she gets pissed, I have never heard a more irritating voice and Trump will definitely piss her off. She can be trained on debate strategy against Trump all she wants but all the PR people in the world can't keep her away from that irritating anger voice.
Even if Hillary wins the debate on points, she loses if she gets away from the false image that has been created.
You gotta know that has zero chance of happening. The debates will be better for Hillary than Trump. A very small segment of voters don't know who they are voting for yet....the majority has their mind made up. But Hillary will be able to speak more in depth and intelligent on every issue.
And Trump voters will call him the winner if he pissed his pants on stage.....they will remark how wonderful the piss stream was or something.
Hilary might know more about how the Govt works and has more knowledge about it ...But that can be a huge negative if your aligned with the present administration.. Trump will respond in only the way he can , about the security of the country , the debt , the trade agreements, etc.. Hilary can easily be put on the defensive with the current issues
it was a good speech. Dems had a great week of speeches. I mean, maybe not Scott Baio great but still great.
Cmon.....spend a few minutes listening to a Trump voter....it's pretty funny. Trump repeats the same tag lines over and over again and those voters jump around like he just said something meaningful.
