I don't believe any of them are at this point. People have made up their minds for a while now, so their favorite candidate "won" the debate in their minds.
In other words, had they taken a "who is your favorite candidate?" poll before the debate, the results probably would have been similar. I don't know if any of these debate performances are shifting opinions one way or another. That'd be a more insightful poll IMO..."which candidate are you now more likely to vote for?"
The GOPe is going to shove Barack-O Rubio or Jeb Bush down the people's throats whether they like it or not.
You can see it coming a mile away. These "elections" are, if not rigged, most certainly "guided" by the Washington Cartel, aided and abetted by a corrupt corporate-controlled gaystream media which is nothing more than a propaganda arm for the Ruling Class.
Yeah, I certainly agree. I'd also argue that a poll of people who frequent either breitbart and/or drudge is not representative of the Republican primary electorate as a whole. It's not surprising that your hard core conservative righties feel Trump and Cruz dominate each debate. I don't mean this to be rude, but Trump could take a dump on the stage and walk out without saying a word and many Trump supporters, including a few here, would tell you he won the debate.
I don't care about any of these unscientific polls after the debates.
Its just a bunch of people pressing buttons on websites propping up their favorite like American idol
The undecideds like me don't vote in polls like that .
Its just a bunch of people pressing buttons on websites propping up their favorite like American idol
The undecideds like me don't vote in polls like that .
Any idea why most of the lines are down here:
http://www.oddschecker.com/politics/us-politics/us-republican-primaries/new-hampshire-primary
http://www.oddschecker.com/politics/us-politics/us-republican-primaries/new-hampshire-primary
Certainly not scientific, before the debate even started I checked out the Drudge Report & the Drudge Poll already had
over 15,000 votes with Don Trump getting over 40%. But these online polls do show indicators. Rand Paul when I first checked
had only 7% before the debate started and now with almost 300,000 votes tallied he's at 15% Paul will get a bump in the
more sophisticated polls that will come out probably around Saturday.
After the 2nd debate in which Fiorina came in 2nd to Trump on Drudge she did get a momentary bump that made the
beltway republicans giddy but support for her was never really there. She was a paper tiger erected by the press.
Polls in late September were all just media created—poll numbers being pumped up by media of the
Beltway anti-Trump faction, hoping for almost anyone to slay the Trump dragon.
Rich Lowry for example after that debate embarrassed himself gleefully on Fox stating that Fiorina
'Cut Trumps balls off' in that debate showing how little his analysis amounts to. After the 3rd debate
Lowry realizing his newfound candidate Fiorina was a flop, found a new candidate in Rubio.
Lowry's amount of drooling for an anti-Trump candidate should come with a year’s supply of bibs.
Look the instant online polls do show trends and in fact show those trends far better than the
Beltway pundits who after every debate seem to show their crystal balls are lacking.
