Global Warming or Global Bullshit?

Search

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
51,839
Tokens
Al Gore: Spend $90 Trillion To Ban Cars From Every Major City In The World

Former Vice President Al Gore and former Mexican President Felipe Calderon are pushing for $90 trillion in spending to ban cars from every major city in the world and make them more dense.

Gore and Calderon presented a report from the Global Commission on the Economy & Climate (GCEC) and argued that fighting global warming will require making cities more compact and wholly reliant on public transit. This is the only way to make sure urban areas don’t contribute to global warming, the two politicians argued.

Calderon and Gore argued that $90 trillion is going to be spent anyways in the coming decades upgrading cities around the world. They argue that it should be spent on making cities more climate friendly.

“The mistake we made in Mexico was to let cities develop however they want, and it’s a mess,” Calderon told Business Insider.

GCEC’s study says that “more compact, better-connected cities with strong mass transit systems will help policy-makers tackle these pressing challenges. Such cities are more productive, socially inclusive, resilient, cleaner, quieter and safer.”

The study says that 70 percent of the world’s energy-use and greenhouse-gas emissions come from cities. Reducing emissions from ever-growing urban areas will show “that the goals of economic growth and climate change can work together,” according to GCEC.

Calderon and Gore made their presentation at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland where, ironically (or maybe not, at this point), some 1,700 private jets — which use petroleum — were used to shuttle in conference participants and others to discuss global warming and other pressing global issues.

There was such a big influx of air traffic, reports Newsweek, that the Swiss military had to open an air base for the private jets to land. At last year’s meeting in Davos, some 200 helicopters were used to bring in conference-goers.

Gore also used the conference to announce a massive concert to raise awareness about global warming. He and pop star Pharrell Williams are calling it “Live Earth” and it will be staged in six cities across the globe — not exactly a small carbon footprint.

The concert is supposed to build up support for an international climate treaty ahead of the United Nations summit in Paris later this year. Pharrell says he wants to “have humanity harmonize all at once.”

“It is absolutely crucial that we build public will for an agreement,” Gore told World Economic Forum participants. “The purpose is to have a billion voices with one message, to demand climate action now.”

Follow Michael on Twitter
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contactlicensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

gw-al-gore-fire.jpg
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,754
Tokens
[h=1]The most fuel inefficient mode of transportation in the history of mankind. But they're all against global warming, just let them tell you all about it.

Private Jets Descend on Davos For World Economic Forum[/h]
Billionaires, world leaders and pop stars are clogging up the skies with their private jets as they descend on the annual World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland to liaise over issues such as terrorism, the central banks and growing economic inequality.
Over the course of this week, approximately 550 are expected to fly into the region, resulting airport traffic increasing by 10% which means that landing spots are in short supply.
The Swiss Armed Forces have even opened up one of their military air bases for the first time to try and accommodate the increase in traffic. For private jet companies like PrivateFly, NetJets and VistaJet, this is by far their busiest time of year.

http://www.newsweek.com/private-jets-descend-davos-world-economic-forum-300451
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
51,839
Tokens

DE BLASIO: COULD BE BIGGEST EVER...
3,000+ flights canceled...
CT gov orders all cars off road by 9 PM...
RADAR...SATELLITE...WINTER STORM STATEMENTS...CRISIS MAP...



[SIZE=+7]BLIZZARD BLAST TO MAKE HISTORY
NYC-BOS BRACED[/SIZE]

[SIZE=+7]
[/SIZE]

"The best scientists in the world are all telling us that our activities are changing the climate, and if we do not act forcefully, we’ll continue to see rising oceans, longer, hotter heat waves, dangerous droughts and floods, and massive disruptions that can trigger greater migration, conflict, and hunger around the globe." -- Obama's State of Confusion

LMAOsmiley.gif
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
51,839
Tokens
Exposed EPA Memo: Tie Fighting Global Warming To Americans’ ‘Personal Worries’

“For many, environmental protection is about the caribou, polar bears, and sea otters,” reads the memo. ”While our work certainly impacts all of these creatures, it obviously does not reflect our day-to-day work. It is important for us to change this perception, particularly among those who are critically impacted by [environmental justice] issues – but are otherwise ‘unchurched.’ (By unchurched, I mean they are not affiliated with a group or effort that would self-identify as EJ or environmentalist.)”

However, if we shift from making this about the polar caps and about our neighbor with respiratory illness we can potentially bring this issue home to many Americans,” the memo adds. “There will be many opportunities to discuss climate-related efforts this year. As we do so, we must allow the human health argument to take center stage.”

http://dailycaller.com/2015/01/26/exposed-epa-memo-tie-fighting-global-warming-to-americans-personal-worries/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"unchurched"????? :neenee:

No shame.

Absolutely no shame how far this radical cult will go to con more people into believing The Great Modern Marxist Lie.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
51,839
Tokens
India Rejects Climate Deal With Obama

India has rejected pleas from the Obama administration to enter into an agreement to put a future limit on its greenhouse gas emissions in order to fight global warming.

http://dailycaller.com/2015/01/27/india-rejects-climate-deal-with-obama/

:aktion033
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Messages
2,924
Tokens
India Rejects Climate Deal With Obama

India has rejected pleas from the Obama administration to enter into an agreement to put a future limit on its greenhouse gas emissions in order to fight global warming.

http://dailycaller.com/2015/01/27/india-rejects-climate-deal-with-obama/

:aktion033

Just so you know they are not denying that it exists they are going to try to combat climate change with their own plan, just not Obamas.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
51,839
Tokens
Just so you know they are not denying that it exists they are going to try to combat climate change with their own plan, just not Obamas.

India is paying lip service to these nuts promising they'll develop 'green' solar energy.

"President Barack Obama went abroad hoping to strike a climate deal with India — the world’s third-largest greenhouse-gas emitter — in order to build support for an international global warming treaty ahead of a United Nations summit later this year. But India had other ideas."

"Secretary of State John Kerry went to India earlier this month trying to pave the way for a climate deal before Obama arrived, but he too was unsuccessful. The only agreement Kerry could make was to help fund India’s solar energy development."


Remember: "this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal..." -- Community Agitator 2007

obama-fail-smoke.jpg
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
51,839
Tokens
U.N. Climate Chief: We're 'Intentionally 'Transforming The World Economy

"This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years..."

http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/un-climate-chief-were-intentionally-transforming-world-economy

"Climate Change" = Communism 2.0

UNFlagLarge4-1-2.png


 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
India is paying lip service to these nuts promising they'll develop 'green' solar energy.

"President Barack Obama went abroad hoping to strike a climate deal with India — the world’s third-largest greenhouse-gas emitter — in order to build support for an international global warming treaty ahead of a United Nations summit later this year. But India had other ideas."

"Secretary of State John Kerry went to India earlier this month trying to pave the way for a climate deal before Obama arrived, but he too was unsuccessful. The only agreement Kerry could make was to help fund India’s solar energy development."


Remember: "this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal..." -- Community Agitator 2007

You are just too dumb. India does not reject Global Warming. They are unwilling to do anything about it because they fear it will make their already impoverished country even more impoverished. It's all about money, nothing to do with science. I'm glad that makes you feel like you are winning... solid victory, lol.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
51,839
Tokens
You are just too dumb. India does not reject Global Warming. They are unwilling to do anything about it because they fear it will make their already impoverished country even more impoverished. It's all about money, nothing to do with science. I'm glad that makes you feel like you are winning... solid victory, lol.

Publicly India is paying lip service to this loon theory because the US has a loon 'progressive' as its leader and India doesn't want to ruffle any feathers.

Privately India (like the rest of the world) hopes the American people come to their senses.

"global warming" - you are just too dumb...and fat, lol.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Publicly India is paying lip service to this loon theory because the US has a loon 'progressive' as its leader and India doesn't want to ruffle any feathers.

Privately India (like the rest of the world) hopes the American people come to their senses.

"global warming" - you are just too dumb...and fat, lol.

Publicly everyone is paying lip service at this point. No one wants to give up the money train. Not really that big of a deal and has nothing to do with the actual science of global warming. I'm glad this is how you base your decisions on what countries are choosing to sacrifice money for the future. Good luck with that, lol.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
51,839
Tokens
"China, on the other hand, only promised to peak its emissions by 2030 — something which some energy analysts said was on track to occur even without a government pledge. China also promised to increase its share of non-fossil fuel energy sources to 20 percent of its power supply by 2030 as well."

2030 LOL

Translation: Say whatever you need to say so these libtards ("this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow"
face)(*^%) can present something to their equally libtarded media and loony left wing base.

You are so incredibly dumb and gullible it's not even funny.

:laughingb



 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
51,839
Tokens
The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever

New data shows that the “vanishing” of polar ice is not the result of runaway global warming

bear_3191458b.jpg


The “vanishing” of polar ice (and the polar bears) has become a poster-child for warmists. Photo: ALAMY


By Christopher Booker

10:15PM GMT 07 Feb 2015
comments.gif
14214 Comments


When future generations look back on the global-warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records – on which the entire panic ultimately rested – were systematically “adjusted” to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified.

Two weeks ago, under the headline “How we are being tricked by flawed data on global warming”, I wrote about Paul Homewood, who, on his Notalotofpeopleknowthat blog, had checked the published temperature graphs for three weather stations in Paraguay against the temperatures that had originally been recorded. In each instance, the actual trend of 60 years of data had been dramatically reversed, so that a cooling trend was changed to one that showed a marked warming.

This was only the latest of many examples of a practice long recognised by expert observers around the world – one that raises an ever larger question mark over the entire official surface-temperature record.

Following my last article, Homewood checked a swathe of other South American weather stations around the original three. In each case he found the same suspicious one-way “adjustments”. First these were made by the US government’s Global Historical Climate Network (GHCN). They were then amplified by two of the main official surface records, the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (Giss) and the National Climate Data Center (NCDC), which use the warming trends to estimate temperatures across the vast regions of the Earth where no measurements are taken. Yet these are the very records on which scientists and politicians rely for their belief in “global warming”.

Homewood has now turned his attention to the weather stations across much of the Arctic, between Canada (51 degrees W) and the heart of Siberia (87 degrees E).

Again, in nearly every case, the same one-way adjustments have been made, to show warming up to 1 degree C or more higher than was indicated by the data that was actually recorded. This has surprised no one more than Traust Jonsson, who was long in charge of climate research for the Iceland met office (and with whom Homewood has been in touch). Jonsson was amazed to see how the new version completely “disappears” Iceland’s “sea ice years” around 1970, when a period of extreme cooling almost devastated his country’s economy.


One of the first examples of these “adjustments” was exposed in 2007 by the statistician Steve McIntyre, when he discovered a paper published in 1987 by James Hansen, the scientist (later turned fanatical climate activist) who for many years ran Giss. Hansen’s original graph showed temperatures in the Arctic as having been much higher around 1940 than at any time since. But as Homewood reveals in his blog post, “Temperature adjustments transform Arctic history”, Giss has turned this upside down. Arctic temperatures from that time have been lowered so much that that they are now dwarfed by those of the past 20 years.


Homewood’s interest in the Arctic is partly because the “vanishing” of its polar ice (and the polar bears) has become such a poster-child for those trying to persuade us that we are threatened by runaway warming. But he chose that particular stretch of the Arctic because it is where ice is affected by warmer water brought in by cyclical shifts in a major Atlantic current – this last peaked at just the time 75 years ago when Arctic ice retreated even further than it has done recently. The ice-melt is not caused by rising global temperatures at all.

Of much more serious significance, however, is the way this wholesale manipulation of the official temperature record – for reasons GHCN and Giss have never plausibly explained – has become the real elephant in the room of the greatest and most costly scare the world has known. This really does begin to look like one of the greatest scientific scandals of all time.

 
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Messages
48,571
Tokens
Global warming, my ass.

I just came in from two hours of shoveling. It's about my fifteenth such stint in about two weeks. I not only have to shovel a four car driveway but three long walkways, two flights of stairs, and two porches (ya, the snow has been blowing right onto the open porches). I have a 150 sq ft upper deck that has snow above the deck rails. Almost five feet of snow against the door so I can't get onto said deck without a fifteen foot ladder from the ground. On top of those problems my roof is an ice dam machine. I have raked the areas of the roof that I can access from a ladder at least fifteen times. My elbow is killing me from working that longassed rake. Water is still coming in from the window housing in one room and ruining the ceiling in another room. It will find it's way n several other places before winter is done.

I am beat up and burned out.

It's still snowing about an inch or two an hour. The temperature is 14 degrees. That's warm compared to some recent days, many with windchills well below zero.

Did I say it's still snowing.

Fuck you and global warming.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
51,839
Tokens

This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution," -- Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.'s Framework Convention on Climate Change

"No matter if the science of global warming is all phony...climate change provides the greatest opportunity to bring about

justice and equality in the world." -- Christine Stewart, former Canadian Minister of the Enviroment

“We’ve got to ride the global-warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing
in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.” --
Timoth Wirth, U.S./UN functionary, former elected Democrat Senator

"We redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy…Basically it's a big mistake to discuss climate policy
separately from the major themes of globalization...One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate
policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore." --
Ottmar Edenhoffer, high level UN-IPCC official

"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water
shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill....All these dangers are caused by human intervention....and thus the “real
enemy, then, is humanity itself....believe humanity requires a common motivation, namely a common adversary in order to
realize world government. It does not matter if this common enemy is “a real one or….one invented for the purpose." --
Club of Rome

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

akphi-idiot's type of people

:poop:
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
51,839
Tokens
Republicans To Investigate Climate Data Tampering By NASA

2:16 PM 02/20/2015
Are government climate agencies tampering with climate data to show warming? Some Republicans think so. California Republican Rep. Dana Rohrabacher says to expect congressional hearings on climate data tampering.

@caerbannog666 expect there to be congressional hearings into NASA altering weather station data to falsely indicate warming & sea rise
— Dana Rohrabacher (@DanaRohrabacher) February 20, 2015

Rohrabacher serves as the vice chairman of the House Science, Space and Technology Committee, which has jurisdiction over NASA and other agencies that monitor the Earth’s climate.

Rohrabacher has long been critical of the theory of man-made global warming. Lately, the California Republican has criticizing NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for allegedly tampering with temperature data to create an artificial warming trend. Such data is then used to justify regulations aimed at curbing fossil fuel use and other industrial activities.

@grngamine journalist investigation shows records of various weather stations altered by AGW advocates to make it appear to be warming.
— Dana Rohrabacher (@DanaRohrabacher) February 19, 2015

@caerbannog666 U seem unaware of latest revelation of data manipulation. NASA reported higher temp than what was record at weather stations
— Dana Rohrabacher (@DanaRohrabacher) February 19, 2015

Rohrabacher isn’t the only one to call for hearings on the science behind global warming. Oklahoma Republican Sen. Jim Inhofe has also promised to hold hearings on global warming data.

“We’re going to have a committee hearing on the science,”
said Inhofe, who chairs the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. “People are going to hear the other side of the story.”

For years, those skeptical of man-made global warming have argued that government agencies are altering raw temperature data to create a warming trend. Allegations of tampering have increased as satellite temperature readings show much less warming than land and ocean-based weather stations show.

Science blogger Steven Goddard (a pseudonym) has been a major critic of NASA’s and NOAA’s temperature measurements. Goddard points out that NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center makes the present look warmer by artificially cooling past temperatures to show a warming trend.

“NCDC pulls every trick in the book to turn the US cooling trend into warming. The raw data shows cooling since the 1920s,” Goddard told The Daily Caller News Foundation in an interview last month.


“NCDC does a hockey stick of adjustments to reverse the trend,” Goddard said. “This includes cooling the past for ‘time of observation bias’ infilling missing rural data with urban temperatures, and doing almost nothing to compensate for urban heat island effects.”


NOAA does make temperature adjustments, but it argues such adjustments are necessary to remove “artificial biases” in surface temperature data. The biggest adjustment made by

NCDC scientists is cooling past data to take into account the fact that there was a big shift from taking temperature readings in the afternoon to the morning.


“We get a lot of people questioning our data adjustments,” Thomas Peterson, NCDC’s principal scientist, told TheDCNF. There was an “artificial cool bias in the data,” Peterson said.

Switching the time of the day temperatures were taken from the afternoon, when temperatures are warmer, to the morning, when temperatures are cooler, caused a cooling bias in the data. Temperature data from nearby weather stations was used to help create a baseline temperature for different regions.

But there are some drawbacks in surface temperature readings from a few thousand weather stations, boats and buoys spread out across the world. Peterson said the weather station system is “only really good for the U.S.”

“The main problem is where there are a few stations in the middle of nowhere.” Peterson said, specifically referring to weather station data problems on St. Helena Island.


UK Telegraph writer Christopher Booker joined the fray recently, using work by Goddard and other bloggers to criticize climate agencies for data tampering.


“Of much more serious significance, however, is the way this wholesale manipulation of the official temperature record… has become the real elephant in the room of the greatest and most costly scare the world has known,”
Booker wrote. “This really does begin to look like one of the greatest scientific scandals of all time.”


Follow Michael on
Twitter and Facebook

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contactlicensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

cockingasnook()cheersgif

 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,118,714
Messages
13,558,657
Members
100,672
Latest member
nhacaihb88help
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com