CO2 rates aren't even forecast to double until around 2080. The question was a non-scientific simple hypothetical question about CO2 rates doubling in a randomly generated 40 years. It's probably the dumbest thing to argue about, lol. If he made a peer-reviewed research paper suggesting this, that would be one thing. But a hypothetical question in an interview. Come on now. Get better material.
Ok, so no bet??
How about $10,000, that five years from this day, none of the next 5 years will break the record in 1934.
That record has been holding strong ever since the Global Alarmists have been screaming on their soapbox.
So, do you have enough faith in them to take the bet? Or are you gonna call me a loon/birther/etc. and throw a couple insults and not take it?
How about $10,000, that five years from this day, none of the next 5 years will break the record in 1934.
That record has been holding strong ever since the Global Alarmists have been screaming on their soapbox.
So, do you have enough faith in them to take the bet? Or are you gonna call me a loon/birther/etc. and throw a couple insults and not take it?
You can't even parody these people:
While doing research 12 or 13 years ago, I met Jim Hansen, the scientist who in 1988 predicted the greenhouse effect before Congress. I went over to the window with him and looked out on Broadway in New York City and said, “If what you’re saying about the greenhouse effect is true, is anything going to look different down there in 20 years?” He looked for a while and was quiet and didn’t say anything for a couple seconds. Then he said, “Well, there will be more traffic.” I, of course, didn’t think he heard the question right. Then he explained, “The West Side Highway [which runs along the Hudson River] will be under water. And there will be tape across the windows across the street because of high winds. And the same birds won’t be there. The trees in the median strip will change.” Then he said, “There will be more police cars.” Why? “Well, you know what happens to crime when the heat goes up.”
Didn’t he also say that restaurants would have signs in their windows that read, “Water by request only.”
Under the greenhouse effect, extreme weather increases. Depending on where you are in terms of the hydrological cycle, you get more of whatever you’re prone to get. New York can get droughts, the droughts can get more severe and you’ll have signs in restaurants saying “Water by request only.”
When did he say this will happen?
Within 20 or 30 years. And remember we had this conversation in 1988 or 1989.
Does he still believe these things?
Yes, he still believes everything. I talked to him a few months ago and he said he wouldn’t change anything that he said then.
Water by request only
LMFAO
Note: the "greenhouse effect" doesn't increase extreme weather at all. These laughable liars were insisting we would see more hurricanes. Of course that hasn't happened.
Climatologists aren't real scientists. Real scientists and meteorologists laugh at these money-grubbing Al Gore scaremongers.
Can we please defund these Big Govt leeches and stop funding the corrupt UN?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 1974, climatologists said that global cooling was going to kill us all.
Meteorologists at the time said that climatologists don’t know what they are talking about, and aren’t real scientists.
Fast forward to 201, and nothing has changed – except that climatologists now use the word “warming” instead of “cooling.”
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
aaaktard's kind of people!
Loser!@#0
Can we please defund these Big Govt leeches and stop funding the corrupt UN?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 1974, climatologists said that global cooling was going to kill us all.
Meteorologists at the time said that climatologists don’t know what they are talking about, and aren’t real scientists.
Fast forward to 201, and nothing has changed – except that climatologists now use the word “warming” instead of “cooling.”
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
aaaktard's kind of people!
Loser!@#0
You can't even parody these people:
While doing research 12 or 13 years ago, I met Jim Hansen, the scientist who in 1988 predicted the greenhouse effect before Congress. I went over to the window with him and looked out on Broadway in New York City and said, “If what you’re saying about the greenhouse effect is true, is anything going to look different down there in 20 years?” He looked for a while and was quiet and didn’t say anything for a couple seconds. Then he said, “Well, there will be more traffic.” I, of course, didn’t think he heard the question right. Then he explained, “The West Side Highway [which runs along the Hudson River] will be under water. And there will be tape across the windows across the street because of high winds. And the same birds won’t be there. The trees in the median strip will change.” Then he said, “There will be more police cars.” Why? “Well, you know what happens to crime when the heat goes up.”
Didn’t he also say that restaurants would have signs in their windows that read, “Water by request only.”
Under the greenhouse effect, extreme weather increases. Depending on where you are in terms of the hydrological cycle, you get more of whatever you’re prone to get. New York can get droughts, the droughts can get more severe and you’ll have signs in restaurants saying “Water by request only.”
When did he say this will happen?
Within 20 or 30 years. And remember we had this conversation in 1988 or 1989.
Does he still believe these things?
Yes, he still believes everything. I talked to him a few months ago and he said he wouldn’t change anything that he said then.
Water by request only
LMFAO
Note: the "greenhouse effect" doesn't increase extreme weather at all. These laughable liars were insisting we would see more hurricanes. Of course that hasn't happened.
Damn you're fucking dumb. We've already been through this. The reporter acknowledged he lied about saying 20 years. In fact the question was,
"When I interviewed James Hansen I asked him to speculate on what the view outside his office window could look like in 40 years with doubled CO2. I'd been trying to think of a way to discuss the greenhouse effect in a way that would make sense to average readers. I wasn't asking for hard scientific studies. It wasn't an academic interview. It was a discussion with a kind and thoughtful man who answered the question. You can find the description in two of my books, most recently The Coming Storm."
You guys are fucking retarded and will believe anything you read on the Internet. Hilarious.
Lmao!! And I quoted the reporter also. Also the reporter admitted to having the years wrong...
"Michaels also has the facts wrong about a 1988 interview of me by Bob Reiss, in which Reiss asked me to speculate on changes that might happen in New York City in 40 years assuming CO2 doubled in amount. Michaels has it as 20 years, not 40 years, with no mention of doubled CO2. Reiss verified this fact to me, but he later sent the message:
“I went back to my book and re-read the interview I had with you. I am embarrassed to say that although the book text is correct, in remembering our original conversation, during a casual phone interview with a Salon magazine reporter in 2001 I was off in years. What I asked you originally at your office window was for a prediction of what Broadway would look like in 40 years, not 20. But when I spoke to the Salon reporter 10 years later probably because I’d been watching the predictions come true, I remembered it as a 20 year question.“
You believe anything you read on the Internet... lmao!! Some peoples kids.
Some people need an IQ test before they should be allowed to use the Internet.
Bob Reiss reports the conversation as follows:
Bob Reiss reports the conversation as follows:
"When I interviewe**d James Hansen I asked him to speculate on what the view outside his office window could look like in 40 years with doubled CO2. I'd been trying to think of a way to discuss the greenhouse effect in a way that would make sense to average readers. I wasn't asking for hard scientific studies. It wasn't an academic interview. It was a discussion with a kind and thoughtful man who answered the question. You can find the descriptio**n in two of my books, most recently The Coming Storm."
James Hansen reports the conversation as follows:
"Reiss asked me to speculate on changes that might happen in New York City in 40 years assuming CO2 doubled in amount."
