The understanding is like so super easy!
Despite the fact that they can't explain why the earth is no longer warming, that is.
Despite the fact that they IPCC is now projecting a continued pause in warming.
Despite the fact that the IPCC admits that while computer models forecast a decline in Antarctic sea ice, it has actually grown to a new record high. And,the IPCC cannot say why.
Despite the fact that they can't explain why the earth is no longer warming, that is.
Despite the fact that they IPCC is now projecting a continued pause in warming.
Despite the fact that the IPCC admits that while computer models forecast a decline in Antarctic sea ice, it has actually grown to a new record high. And,the IPCC cannot say why.
Still never explained what caused those massive climate changes a few hundred years ago, and the Ice age.....
What could have caused that?
Im guessing was the earths axis...... The Sun...... Natural occurances that happen every so often with nature.
You know, common sense stuff.
Unless it was the dinosaurs and those humans in the middle age, with all their pollutants, driving, burning stuff in factories
What could have caused that?
Im guessing was the earths axis...... The Sun...... Natural occurances that happen every so often with nature.
You know, common sense stuff.
Unless it was the dinosaurs and those humans in the middle age, with all their pollutants, driving, burning stuff in factories
This is very difficult... I mean on one side you have real life geniuses like Acebb, who doesn't even know what liquidate means and has trouble with basic division, scottcarter, a resident conspiracy theorists, and festeringZit (dude named himself festeringZit... enough said) or NASA and real life scientists?
Very very difficult. You guys all make such compelling arguments, lmao!! "But it's cold, global warming must not be true!!!"
Very very difficult. You guys all make such compelling arguments, lmao!! "But it's cold, global warming must not be true!!!"
Scientific evidence for warming of the climate system is unequivocal.
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Natural occurrences and human created global warming can both exist. It's not a false dichotomy. And I love how you think it's common sense to understand what happened a million years ago. The same scientists telling you right now, with all the technology we have, that man is causing the Earth to warm are the same scientists that will give you the closest understanding of what happened during previous climate changes. It's funny how you believe them more talking about stuff that happened a million years ago than what is happening now. You guys are funny people.
Its cause they have all the evidence AFTER THE FACT.... right now you have people on both sides, grasping straws, trying to determine whats causing it this time around. One side gets paid $$ and companies can make a profit if its man-made... on the other, no one can make a time, cause you cant change mother nature.
Easy to get the facts after everything has happened (Ice age, middle age warmth, little ice-age).
With all of those prior occurrences happening (I think the list is around 9) of real changes that effected the earth, ALL of them have been due to natural causes (Mother nature, sun, earths axis, etc) and NOT 1 has been man made.
So, that's why I am going with past proven science and those that have nothing to gain from stating it.
Why all of a sudden, this time its man made? Has never been man made before.
Ill put my money on the team that's won 9 championships in a row, vs a team that has never played or showed up before.
No, you have people on one side (scientists that study climatology) and then you have politicians and bloggers on the other side. We have the technology and ability to measure natural causes. The evidence points directly to an increase in CO2 caused by man pumping billions of tons of Co2 in the atmosphere. It's man made this time because man is pumping shit in to the atmosphere. It wasn't man made when the dinosaurs were around because man didn't exist. I can't believe that has to be explained to you, lol.
http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
2014, was Anchorage's first documented year in recorded history where there was not a single day with subzero temperatures. This is the craziest winter I've seen here. Had to shovel the driveway once and there is no snow on the roads. If I were a conservative I would say this is evidence of global warming. But I'm smarter than that, lol.
Yes, it's really simple math, lol... coming from the guy who has trouble with simple division. You're a funny clown.
A better fit could be obtained with three hyperbolic tangents, but the errors on the data do not justify it.
The resulting temperature change relative to 1700 due to fossil-fuels burning and non-fossil-fuels emissions is:
