As your sources on global warming keep getting busted over and over again about fudging and outright lying about their data...using abandoned stations...not using hard factual numbers but projections bases on false pretenses...
then you come in here and call others uneducated.
Biggest farce in the history of the RX you are. You must be proud.
Those aren't my sources. Those come from your sources. I have 10s of thousands of sources that say global warming is real. I'm glad out of all the thousands of real scientists and organizations you found one or two that fabricated their findings. That must mean the retarded Republicans are right, lol! You guys are funny people. Hard to believe there is actually an adult on the other side typing this shit up.
in case you all haven't heard by 2048 your options for escaping hurricanes and intense heat will be "very limited" 
talk about your tin-foil hat fear mongering...
Alaska Is Going To Be the Next Florida'
By P.J. Gladnick | September 25, 2014 | 1:50 PM EDT
Share it Tweet itMore Sharing Services
It's something you would expect from a sanity challenged fringe blog or from the usual suspects such as the Democratic Underground or the Daily Kos. Instead the latest example of global warming wackiness is coming from the Gray Lady herself, the New York Times. This is an actual unchallenged quote in a Times article by Jennifer A. Kingson “Alaska is going to be the next Florida by the end of the century.”
Got that? Not in millions of years but by the end of this century. Of course no data is provided to back up this assertion. In fact the rest of the wild predictions in the article also fail to be backed up by any data other than the claim that computer models project these outcomes. One thing to be said about the New York Times in Moonbat Mode is that their desperation to "prove" global warming can be hilariously entertaining as we shall see:
Besides the idea of Alaska becoming the new Florida, the most amusing aspect of this article is the absolute precision of its predictions...based on no data:
talk about your tin-foil hat fear mongering...
Alaska Is Going To Be the Next Florida'
By P.J. Gladnick | September 25, 2014 | 1:50 PM EDT
Share it Tweet itMore Sharing Services
0
shares
shares
It's something you would expect from a sanity challenged fringe blog or from the usual suspects such as the Democratic Underground or the Daily Kos. Instead the latest example of global warming wackiness is coming from the Gray Lady herself, the New York Times. This is an actual unchallenged quote in a Times article by Jennifer A. Kingson “Alaska is going to be the next Florida by the end of the century.”
Got that? Not in millions of years but by the end of this century. Of course no data is provided to back up this assertion. In fact the rest of the wild predictions in the article also fail to be backed up by any data other than the claim that computer models project these outcomes. One thing to be said about the New York Times in Moonbat Mode is that their desperation to "prove" global warming can be hilariously entertaining as we shall see:
Scientists trying to predict the consequences of climate change say that they see few havens from the storms, floods and droughts that are sure to intensify over the coming decades. But some regions, they add, will fare much better than others.
Forget most of California and the Southwest (drought, wildfires). Ditto for much of the East Coast and Southeast (heat waves, hurricanes, rising sea levels). Washington, D.C., for example, may well be a flood zone by 2100, according to an estimate released last week.
Instead, consider Anchorage. Or even, perhaps, Detroit.
I better purchase a beach blanket with a polar bear on it for sunbathing in Alaska. And now for the money quote:Forget most of California and the Southwest (drought, wildfires). Ditto for much of the East Coast and Southeast (heat waves, hurricanes, rising sea levels). Washington, D.C., for example, may well be a flood zone by 2100, according to an estimate released last week.
Instead, consider Anchorage. Or even, perhaps, Detroit.
“If you do not like it hot and do not want to be hit by a hurricane, the options of where to go are very limited,” said Camilo Mora, a geography professor at the University of Hawaii and lead author of a paper published in Nature last year predicting that unprecedented high temperatures will become the norm worldwide by 2047.
“The best place really is Alaska,” he added. “Alaska is going to be the next Florida by the end of the century.”
So if Alaska is going to become the tropical vacation spot of the nation in a few years what of Florida? Here is the answer which is again carefully data-free:“The best place really is Alaska,” he added. “Alaska is going to be the next Florida by the end of the century.”
In May, Miami was named one of the nation’s most vulnerable cities in the National Climate Assessment, the third in a series of federal reports on how global warming will play out across the country. The week the report was released, Miami Beach residents were wading through ankle-deep waters on some of their main thoroughfares.
As sea levels rise in the decades ahead, said Professor Mass of the University of Washington, “if there’s ground zero for where you don’t want to be, Florida is it.” Other particularly vulnerable places are the low-lying cities of the East and Gulf Coasts, he noted.
Sigh! It's called the tide. Specifically a very natural king tide that has been happening for years. Here is the explanation from the Miami Herald that doesn't fit into the New York Times mantra about rising seas due to global warming:As sea levels rise in the decades ahead, said Professor Mass of the University of Washington, “if there’s ground zero for where you don’t want to be, Florida is it.” Other particularly vulnerable places are the low-lying cities of the East and Gulf Coasts, he noted.
Leonard Berry, a professor at the Florida Center for Environmental Studies at Florida Atlantic University, said the king tides are natural phenomena lasting three to four days that affect areas like eastern Las Olas Boulevard in Fort Lauderdale in addition low-lying Miami Beach.
“The king tides are caused by a combination of the position of the moon and the sun and the earth,” he said.
Common sense would tell you that if the ocean is rising then the Miami Beach hotels, such as the Fountainebleau, which have been there 60 years or more would have sea water up by their pool decks. Instead, the ocean level is about where it was in the 1950s.“The king tides are caused by a combination of the position of the moon and the sun and the earth,” he said.
Besides the idea of Alaska becoming the new Florida, the most amusing aspect of this article is the absolute precision of its predictions...based on no data:
“The coasts are all going to be facing very hot temperatures,” Professor Mora said. Washington, D.C., will reach its tipping point the same year, under his model; Los Angeles has until 2048; San Francisco, 2049 and Chicago, 2052. Detroit has until 2051, and Anchorage, 2071.
Are you sure about that? Perhaps Detroit has until 2052 and San Francisco has until 2050. April 1 of that year to be exact.
fear ebola? how about terrorism? no, dems say it's climate change
- really are living in bizarroworld when a fabricated, fictitious "crisis" outpaces the real ones
The Pew Research Center/USA Today survey, conducted between Aug. 20 and 24, shows that 68 percent of Democrats said global climate change is THE “major threat” to the U.S.
Among Democrats, global climate change topped the list of greatest threats to the U.S. But among Republicans and Independents, it placed last on a list of nine "major threats."
The top major concerns for Democrats were global climate change, followed by extremist groups, North Korea's nuclear program , Iran's nuclear program, the rapid spread of infectious diseases from country to country, growing tensions between Russia and its neighbors, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and China's emergence as a world power.
posted this one in the ebola thread and will put here as i'm dumfounded at the idiocy of these people. would have loved if they put some other imaginary causes on the list like "zombie apocalypse" or "alien invasion" just to see where they would rate in a libby's mind.
;+)-
Washington (AFP) - The deep ocean may not be hiding heat after all, raising new questions about why global warming appears to have slowed in recent years, said the US space agency Monday.
Scientists have noticed that while greenhouse gases have continued to mount in the first part of the 21st century, global average surface air temperatures have stopped rising along with them, said NASA.
Some studies have suggested that heat is being absorbed temporarily by the deep seas, and that this so-called global warming hiatus is a temporary trend.
But latest data from satellite and direct ocean temperature measurements from 2005 to 2013 "found the ocean abyss below 1.24 miles (1,995 meters) has not warmed measurably," NASA said in a statement.
So-Sorry-935&
Remember, this is all settled science and these guys know exactly what is going on here.
Scientists have noticed that while greenhouse gases have continued to mount in the first part of the 21st century, global average surface air temperatures have stopped rising along with them, said NASA.
Some studies have suggested that heat is being absorbed temporarily by the deep seas, and that this so-called global warming hiatus is a temporary trend.
But latest data from satellite and direct ocean temperature measurements from 2005 to 2013 "found the ocean abyss below 1.24 miles (1,995 meters) has not warmed measurably," NASA said in a statement.
So-Sorry-935&
Remember, this is all settled science and these guys know exactly what is going on here.
Temperatures have risen about 0.85 degree Celsius (1.5F) since about 1900 but have been virtually flat since about 1998 despite higher emissions from factories, power plants and cars.
When your theory is that more CO2 in the atmosphere leads to higher temperatures and yet more CO2 in the atmosphere doesn't really lead to higher temperatures, you may want to get a new theory.
When your theory is that more CO2 in the atmosphere leads to higher temperatures and yet more CO2 in the atmosphere doesn't really lead to higher temperatures, you may want to get a new theory.
don't worry they'll pay some new group of scientists nicely to take the raw data and let a computer decide how this is still proof of global warming
the humorous part is the data was collected because these so-called scientists were so stuck on the global warming hiatus being contributed to the "ocean eating up the heat" that they spent a few more million dollars to prove "global warming deniers" right.
1) global warming hasn't happened for decades - fact
2) there is no proven causation b/w co2 levels and temperature change - fact
____________________________________________________________________
1) global warming is more threatening to the usa than terrorism, war or disease - leftist fiction
2) alaska will be the only place left in 30 years to escape the horrible wrath of heat and hurricanes brought on by global warming - leftist fiction
3) akped will end his nfl season with a record above .500 - leftist fiction
Here is the extent of global warming since 1880 when read by a typical thermometer.
http://suyts.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/image266.png
Pretty scary stuff! Let's abandon our whole way of life and the industries that have brought us out of poverty and strife.
http://suyts.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/image266.png
Pretty scary stuff! Let's abandon our whole way of life and the industries that have brought us out of poverty and strife.
It is simpleton logic to attack the location from which the graph is obtained. The source of the data is clearly cited and it is in fact the warmest of the five major global average temperature products. It would be much more intellectually honest of you to question what all the climate change fuss is about given the perspective the graph has illustrated.
http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/weather/Ice-cover-Poles-apart.html
The final results are in, and the Arctic ice cover reached its sixth-lowest extent this year in the era of satellite recordkeeping, dating to 1979, according to the National Snow and Ice Data Center.
While 2014 nudged last year to No. 7 on the list, the overall seasonal loss between the high and low points – March 21 and Sept. 17 – was the least since 2006, the center said.
The total areal coverage, 1.94 million square miles, was significantly higher than the 2012 nadir – 1.32 million square miles – but the center said that overall ice is vanishing at the rate of 13.3 percent per decade.
“This year was nothing surprising. Overall we’re continuing the long-term decreasing trend,” Walt Meier, research scientist at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, was quoted as saying in the center’s news release.
By contrast, at the other end of the world the snow-and-ice cover reached a record level at the Antarctic. As of Sept. 22, it stood at 7.76 million square miles, or about 8 percent above the 30-year average.
The snow-and-ice center said the reasons for the growth were uncertain. Said Ted Scambos, the center’s lead scientist: “What we're learning is, we have more to learn."
- - -
Boy, scientists admitting they still have a lot to learn? I thought this was all settled...because the last 30-50 years totally represents the entire history of the globe.
Cue the music..
The final results are in, and the Arctic ice cover reached its sixth-lowest extent this year in the era of satellite recordkeeping, dating to 1979, according to the National Snow and Ice Data Center.
While 2014 nudged last year to No. 7 on the list, the overall seasonal loss between the high and low points – March 21 and Sept. 17 – was the least since 2006, the center said.
The total areal coverage, 1.94 million square miles, was significantly higher than the 2012 nadir – 1.32 million square miles – but the center said that overall ice is vanishing at the rate of 13.3 percent per decade.
“This year was nothing surprising. Overall we’re continuing the long-term decreasing trend,” Walt Meier, research scientist at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, was quoted as saying in the center’s news release.
By contrast, at the other end of the world the snow-and-ice cover reached a record level at the Antarctic. As of Sept. 22, it stood at 7.76 million square miles, or about 8 percent above the 30-year average.
The snow-and-ice center said the reasons for the growth were uncertain. Said Ted Scambos, the center’s lead scientist: “What we're learning is, we have more to learn."
- - -
Boy, scientists admitting they still have a lot to learn? I thought this was all settled...because the last 30-50 years totally represents the entire history of the globe.
Cue the music..
