"Global Warming is rubbish"

[scottcarter]

This is why you are on the retard bar...

ak educated bar is priceless. I am waiting for the 'proof Santa Clause exists' bar.

 

[Acebb]

Yea, 3% of climatologists believe global warming isn't real. You found 1 of the few. Great job!

Except there is no proof to support your idiotic claim.

 

[Acebb]

Since you pretend to know what you're talking about, please tell us what you think is a reasonable interval of time to sample data to determine that the
earth is indeed warming. Also, please let us know in your own words how one should determine a baseline in order to determine this "warming."

Now, keep in mind that the earth is ~4.5 billion years old. Since you pretend to know what you are talking about, let us know how long we've been
tracking data which is relevant to this purported global warming, and then compare it to the age of the earth.

Once you've done that, please explain in your own words how to prove that 1. global warming is indeed occurring and 2. that the actions of mankind is responsible.

These are very straight-forward questions, so don't even try to copy/paste.

If you have problems in comprehension with the questions, I'm willing to help you there, since we're all familiar with the grade level at which you think.

Oh one more simple question: Please explain in your own words why, if global warming is indeed occurring did these same "scientists" claim that
the earth was cooling just a few short decades ago?

This was a fantastic obliteration of the dumb little kid.

Of course he neither has the intelligence or honesty to admit that.

 

[akphidelt]

Except there is no proof to support your idiotic claim.

There's actually been two studies, one in 2009, one in 2013 that both prove 97% of climatologists support global warming. That's why you are on the retard bar!

 

[akphidelt]

This was a fantastic obliteration of the dumb little kid.

Of course he neither has the intelligence or honesty to admit that.

Answer the questions yourself since you are such a global warming expert, lol.

Armchair climatologists here, lol.

 

[Acebb]

There's actually been two studies, one in 2009, one in 2013 that both prove 97% of climatologists support global warming. That's why you are on the retard bar!

No there haven't.

Note: there isn't 1 single paper that "proves" global warming.

 

[akphidelt]

No there haven't.

Note: there isn't 1 single paper that "proves" global warming.

There's 1000s of papers that prove global warming exists. It is now a fact to the 90+% of the educated community. That's why you are on the retard bar with the likes of some very shoddy characters.

 

[akphidelt]

ak educated bar is priceless. I am waiting for the 'proof Santa Clause exists' bar.

A better question would be, "Was Obama born in America". I have a reasonable suspicion the graph would look the exact same. That's why you guys belong to the retard bar, lol.

 

[Acebb]

There's 1000s of papers that prove global warming exists.

Actually, there are zero. And if there were any, you'd cite one.

But of course you're a scientific illiterate so you'll just lie.

 

[scottcarter]

A better question would be, "Was Obama born in America". I have a reasonable suspicion the graph would look the exact same. That's why you guys belong to the retard bar, lol.

for the record ...

The whole birther thing is ridiculous. Personally I don't care if he was born in the USA, Kenya or in a test tube in outer space. I agree or disagree on each subject based on the facts presented. That is a major difference between us.

 

[akphidelt]

Actually, there are zero. And if there were any, you'd cite one.

But of course you're a scientific illiterate so you'll just lie.

There are thousands. That's why 97% of climatologists who write papers on climate change agree that it is happening.

http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence

 

[akphidelt]

for the record ...

The whole birther thing is ridiculous. Personally I don't care if he was born in the USA, Kenya or in a test tube in outer space. I agree or disagree on each subject based on the facts presented. That is a major difference between us.

Lol, well you should feel very comfortable here. Lot of people with weird thoughts! Like your boy Russ, lol.

 

[Acebb]

There are thousands.

No there are not, or you would post 1.

Scientific illiterate.

 

[Acebb]

That's why 97% of climatologists who write papers on climate change agree that it is happening.

This is another idiotic lie.

 

[akphidelt]

No there are not, or you would post 1.

Scientific illiterate.

There are thousands.

This is why I don't even bother arguing with you guys on this topic. Scientists are much smarter than you or I and the publications that prove global warming are very complex. Something that I don't even understand. If I don't understand, I know for a fact you have no fucking clue what it means.

Conclusions
We used a multi model archive to obtain fingerprints of atmospheric

temperaturechange.These
fingerprints are estimates of the climate

responses to external forcing by the combined effects of anthro-
pogenic factors, volcanoes, and solar irradiance. The primary

components of external forcing over the past century are human-
caused increases in well-mixed greenhouse gases, depletion of
stratosphericozone, andchanges inatmospheric burdensofvarious
aerosol particles (20, 57). Our
fingerprints, therefore, mainlyre

flecthuman in

fluences on climate (7, 19, 29).

When global mean changes were included in our detection
method, we were able to identify the model
fingerprints with high

statistical confidence in 53 of 55 model data comparisons. For

changes in TLS from 1979 to 2011, S/N ratios varied from 26 to 36,
depending on the choice of observational dataset. For changes in
TLT, S/N ratios ranged from roughly three to eight. Although the
TLT ratios are lower than for TLS, they are still highly significant.

There is literally no chance you understand anything going on in this paper. Which is why you guys quote .com bloggers who write things in stupid ways so that the retard bar crew will believe them.

http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/11/28/1210514109.full.pdf

 

[scottcarter]

There are thousands. That's why 97% of climatologists who write papers on climate change agree that it is happening.

http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence

again, why not 100%?

If 97% of experts claimed Salmon swim upstream to lay eggs, wouldn't you be curious as to why its not 100%. The fact is, 100% do agree. duh!

I will await your hysterical reply and insult.

 

[Acebb]

There is literally no chance you understand anything going on in this paper.

That comment is of course projection. That paper does not 'prove' global warming is happening, nor does it ever make any such claim.

You are a comically dimwitted individual.

 

[Acebb]

Which is why you guys quote .com bloggers who write things in stupid ways so that the retard bar crew will believe them.

Except you can't point to any example of me, ever, quoting any ".com blogger" on this topic.

You are a comically bad liar.

 

[akphidelt]

again, why not 100%?

If 97% of experts claimed Salmon swim upstream to lay eggs, wouldn't you be curious as to why its not 100%. The fact is, 100% do agree. duh!

I will await your hysterical reply and insult.

Because you can't replicate an atmosphere. It's just an analysis of data. 3% think the analysis of the data is not sufficient enough to make the claim that global warming is man made. 97% think the data is. That's why it's so easy for the retard bar to come up with bloggers that make ignorant cases that it isn't true. Because you can't test it.

 

[akphidelt]

That comment is of course projection. That paper does not 'prove' global warming is happening, nor does it ever make any such claim.

You are a comically dimwitted individual.

You are literally one of the dumbest people I've ever met, lol. It says it specifically...

The primary components of external forcing over the past century are human caused increases in well-mixed greenhouse gases.

What's funny is this is one of the publications that the NASA site uses to support their claim that global warming is real. It's not one of your .com blogs. Lol.

Damn you are dumb.