"Global Warming is rubbish"

[russ1945]

In 17 years not one global warming model has been met, not one. Aktard cannot deal with facts, he is the tard plain and simple. 19,000 posts says it all and everyone a troll.

 

[festeringZit]

There isn't "a single one". There are thousands. That's why smart people consider it a fact and retards like you use conservative blogs.

Since you pretend to know what you're talking about, please tell us what you think is a reasonable interval of time to sample data to determine that the
earth is indeed warming. Also, please let us know in your own words how one should determine a baseline in order to determine this "warming."

Now, keep in mind that the earth is ~4.5 billion years old. Since you pretend to know what you are talking about, let us know how long we've been
tracking data which is relevant to this purported global warming, and then compare it to the age of the earth.

Once you've done that, please explain in your own words how to prove that 1. global warming is indeed occurring and 2. that the actions of mankind is responsible.

These are very straight-forward questions, so don't even try to copy/paste.

If you have problems in comprehension with the questions, I'm willing to help you there, since we're all familiar with the grade level at which you think.

Oh one more simple question: Please explain in your own words why, if global warming is indeed occurring did these same "scientists" claim that
the earth was cooling just a few short decades ago?

 

[akphidelt]

There are so many you can't cite a single one!

The 17-year pause in global warming is likely to last into the 2030s and the Arctic sea ice has already started to recover, according to new research.

A paper in the peer-reviewed journal Climate Dynamics – by Professor Judith Curry of the Georgia Institute of Technology and Dr Marcia Wyatt – amounts to a stunning challenge to climate science orthodoxy.

Not only does it explain the unexpected pause, it suggests that the scientific majority – whose views are represented by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) – have underestimated the role of natural cycles and exaggerated that of greenhouse gases.

97+% of papers on global warming show it exists. That's why smart people know it's a fact and dumb people like you don't.

 

[akphidelt]

Since you pretend to know what you're talking about, please tell us what you think is a reasonable interval of time to sample data to determine that the
earth is indeed warming. Also, please let us know in your own words how one should determine a baseline in order to determine this "warming."

Now, keep in mind that the earth is ~4.5 billion years old. Since you pretend to know what you are talking about, let us know how long we've been
tracking data which is relevant to this purported global warming, and then compare it to the age of the earth.

Once you've done that, please explain in your own words how to prove that 1. global warming is indeed occurring and 2. that the actions of mankind is responsible.

These are very straight-forward questions, so don't even try to copy/paste.

If you have problems in comprehension with the questions, I'm willing to help you there, since we're all familiar with the grade level at which you think.

I'm not a scientist, neither are you. If you want to prove your knowledge show real scientific research that is accepted and agreed upon that proves your theory.

 

[festeringZit]

I'm not a scientist, neither are you. If you want to prove your knowledge show real scientific research that is accepted and agreed upon that proves your theory.

I asked you some very simple questions, and you are dodging them. Why?

 

[SheriffJoe]

I asked you some very simple questions, and you are dodging them. Why?

Because the stupid uneducated troll can't articulate his positions.

The only things the poseur knows how to say is stuff like, "dumb people think like you, smart people think like me", "that's why you're besties with Sheriff Joe, Russ and Acebb" and "Obama is the epitome of perfection"

face)(*^%

 

[akphidelt]

I asked you some very simple questions, and you are dodging them. Why?

Im not a climatologists, neither are you. Your question is what dumb people ask. You should just stick to trolling.

 

[akphidelt]

Because the stupid uneducated troll can't articulate his positions.

The only things the poseur knows how to say is stuff like, "dumb people think like you, smart people think like me", "that's why you're besties with Sheriff Joe, Russ and Acebb" and "Obama is the epitome of perfection"

face)(*^%

Ive articulated my position perfectly. I'm not a climatologist so I listen to climatologists. Not degenerate conservatives who get their information from .com blogs.

 

[festeringZit]

Im not a climatologists, neither are you. Your question is what dumb people ask. You should just stick to trolling.

"Im (sic) not a climatologists"

I rest my case, this guy is a total fucking retard.

 

[SheriffJoe]

"Im (sic) not a climatologists"

I rest my case, this guy is a total fucking retard.

Every time someone gives the uneducated troll a little rope he hangs himself.

Every. Single. Time.

:hanging:

 

[The Guesser]

"Im (sic) not a climatologists"

I rest my case, this guy is a total fucking retard.

Spelling and grammar errors?? Really??? Really??? That's what you're sinkin too? His position is quite reasonable. He's not an expert, so he's listening to, and quoting experts, not political hacks, with an agenda.

 

[festeringZit]

Spelling and grammar errors?? Really??? Really??? That's what you're sinkin too? His position is quite reasonable. He's not an expert, so he's listening to, and quoting experts, not political hacks, with an agenda.

I asked some very simple, very basic questions about the subject, he had absolutely no clue. He has no position. His position is whatever his Messiah tells him to parrot.

 

[akphidelt]

I asked some very simple, very basic questions about the subject, he had absolutely no clue. He has no position. His position is whatever his Messiah tells him to parrot.

They are not simple questions at all. You don't even know the answers. And calling "I'm" a spelling error when I'm typing on a phone. Come on man. You are getting desperate.

 

[The Guesser]

I asked some very simple, very basic questions about the subject, he had absolutely no clue. He has no position. His position is whatever his Messiah tells him to parrot.

Nope, he's taking the position of the vast majority of Climatologists, and he's providing studies which show those figures of their 90+ % support. He's not the one that is politicizing this by using a ridiculous statement like "whatever his messiah is telling him to parrot". Your questions about the topic is beyond his scope, he's admitting that, and relying on those with more knowledge of the topic. This whole topic is simply based on who you believe, and what studies you choose to believe and discard, since Aki accurately stated that no one here is a scientist or climatologist.

 

[Acebb]

97+% of papers on global warming show it exists. That's why smart people know it's a fact and dumb people like you don't.

Um, no they don't. Again, you're a comically dimwitted scientific illiterate.

And notice, you can't cite a single, not 1, paper that "proves" global warming.

 

[Acebb]

Nope, he's taking the position of the vast majority of Climatologists, and he's providing studies which show those figures of their 90+ % support.

There are zero "studies" showing that there is 90% plus support for anything.

Why are you such a liar?

 

[Acebb]

. I'm not a climatologist so I listen to climatologists. Not degenerate conservatives who get their information from .com blogs.

Since I've quoted climatologists and never cited a .com blog while doing so, we can see your statement is laughably false.

 

[Acebb]

I'm not a scientist, neither are you. If you want to prove your knowledge show real scientific research that is accepted and agreed upon that proves your theory.

Your posts on this topic are a great example of what happens when low IQ meets topical ignorance.

Please keep going, this has been rather funny.

 

[akphidelt]

Since I've quoted climatologists and never cited a .com blog while doing so, we can see your statement is laughably false.

Yea, 3% of climatologists believe global warming isn't real. You found 1 of the few. Great job!

 

[akphidelt]

Your posts on this topic are a great example of what happens when low IQ meets topical ignorance.

Please keep going, this has been rather funny.

This is why you are on the retard bar...