*****G-Man's AFC/NFC CHAMPIONSHIP PLAYS.******

[G-Man!]

Cincinnati underrated as usual. Your “play of the week” was Titans -3.5….of course you’d crap like this.

Burrow going to exploit a shitty Kansas City secondary yet again

You act like the Chiefs didn’t even try that first game in Cincy. Bullshit. They just got torched in the second half

Number 9 or 10 team? LMAO

Maybe they compete next year? Uhhhhh they’re in the fucking AFC championship game

All you need to know is that KC will roll. If you think Cincy is that good, then tell me when they played the Browns in Clevelands one of 4 only healthy games this season, That Cleveland buried them 41-16. KC has all the weapons to do the same thing in this mismatch.

In addition - explain that KC put ip 4 Tds in the first half in Cincy.

Andy Reid is known for coasting in games with big leads and he did it in that game - but it came back to bite him in the ass. That wont happen again.

Burrow got sacked 9 times in the Tenn game. He also was sacked 4 times by KC. You cant bet on any team that cant protect the QB.
Especially those that scored only 19 points and 13 points and posted the 2 lowest scoring games of the weekend who won - same as San Fran. Another team that is going to get buried.

Titans also played way down to Cincy's level because another stupid coach decided to pass continuously behind the first down markers and abandon the run with the best RB in the league.

Coaches cant win games - they can only LOSE them with bad play calling.

Cincy played one game all year against the division that the opponent was healthy. Baltimore was depleted twice with no run game and qb , CLe once and Pitt twice.

THAT is a real fact of a soft schedule. Just remember the Browns blowout of Cincy 41-16 and thats all you need to focus on.

 

[brendanjack]

If your basing your plays on this seasons muscle memory then how do you not like the 49ers .? 31- 10 home 27-24 away Why would they want to play them again.

 

[G-Man!]

If your basing your plays on this seasons muscle memory then how do you not like the 49ers .? 31- 10 home 27-24 away Why would they want to play them again.

Completely different offensive system now with Beckham and Kupp passing game along with a healthy defense and LB Miller able to play at full speed. Watch and see.
The moment anyone considers SF as goos as Tampa - is the moment that they lose reality. Beckham will be the difference. as Miller also.
This line is the same line in week 18 and the public will do again - what was the same example I showed in the Alabama/ Georgia game - which is that the public always bets the SU under dog winner in the first game, in the rematches.

Do the four turnovers (FUMBLES) by the Rams mean anything? That game would have been a blowout without those/

This time -a different outcome.

Both Cincy and SF are under dog SU winners against these two teams and neither will win again. Thats my take.
Just like my play on Georgia/ Alabama.

 

[brendanjack]

Completely different offensive system now with Beckham and Kupp passing game along with a healthy defense and LB Miller able to play at full speed. Watch and see.
The moment anyone considers SF as goos as Tampa - is the moment that they lose reality. Beckham will be the difference. as Miller also.
This line is the same line in week 18 and the public will do again - what was the same example I showed in the Alabama/ Georgia game - which is that the public always bets the SU under dog winner in the first game, in the rematches.

Do the four turnovers (FUMBLES) by the Rams mean anything? That game would have been a blowout without those/

This time -a different outcome.

Both Cincy and SF are under dog SU winners against these two teams and neither will win again. Thats my take.
Just like my play on Georgia/ Alabama.

Good luck next Weekend nice write up

 

[Avocado33]

Completely different offensive system now with Beckham and Kupp passing game along with a healthy defense and LB Miller able to play at full speed. Watch and see.
The moment anyone considers SF as goos as Tampa - is the moment that they lose reality. Beckham will be the difference. as Miller also.
This line is the same line in week 18 and the public will do again - what was the same example I showed in the Alabama/ Georgia game - which is that the public always bets the SU under dog winner in the first game, in the rematches.

Do the four turnovers (FUMBLES) by the Rams mean anything? That game would have been a blowout without those/

This time -a different outcome.

Both Cincy and SF are under dog SU winners against these two teams and neither will win again. Thats my take.
Just like my play on Georgia/ Alabama.

Beckham played in both losses to the Niners, though he was new for the first one I guess

Niners have their number. Six in a row now

Beckham averaging like under 40 ypg, though getting a lot of touchdowns

 

[Avocado33]

All you need to know is that KC will roll. If you think Cincy is that good, then tell me when they played the Browns in Clevelands one of 4 only healthy games this season, That Cleveland buried them 41-16. KC has all the weapons to do the same thing in this mismatch.

In addition - explain that KC put ip 4 Tds in the first half in Cincy.

Andy Reid is known for coasting in games with big leads and he did it in that game - but it came back to bite him in the ass. That wont happen again.

Burrow got sacked 9 times in the Tenn game. He also was sacked 4 times by KC. You cant bet on any team that cant protect the QB.
Especially those that scored only 19 points and 13 points and posted the 2 lowest scoring games of the weekend who won - same as San Fran. Another team that is going to get buried.

Titans also played way down to Cincy's level because another stupid coach decided to pass continuously behind the first down markers and abandon the run with the best RB in the league.

Coaches cant win games - they can only LOSE them with bad play calling.

Cincy played one game all year against the division that the opponent was healthy. Baltimore was depleted twice with no run game and qb , CLe once and Pitt twice.

THAT is a real fact of a soft schedule. Just remember the Browns blowout of Cincy 41-16 and thats all you need to focus on.

Yeah why the hell would I put weight into that Browns game in the middle of the year??? Makes no sense

Chiefs weren’t in a position to “coast”. They never had the game nearly won. Cincy can go toe to toe with them

Maybe the Chiefs cover the 7, but let’s just stop acting like the Bengals are this shitty team that doesn’t belong.

You criticize backing a team that can’t protect their QB, yet they are 2-0 ATS in these playoffs. Bengals and Titans should’ve been a pick em. Just an absolute joke of a line

 

[DocHolliday]

Guy must be the biggest Browns fan in the world.

He probably lost more money betting the browns than any other team this year. And he made two big guarantee's this year on this forum. Both were on the browns, both he was wrong on.

 

[Malooka]

"then tell me when they played the Browns in Clevelands one of 4 only healthy games this season"

That game wasn't "in Clevelands" (sic) it was in Cincinnati.

 

[statman03]

Cincy on offense.......their biggest weakness is being # 32 in both sacks and sack yds plus #25 in yds per rush, but Burrow don't seem to care he just takes them and plays on.......KC doesn't sack to much though #27 avg 1.8 sacks, what did they have against Buff, 2 just above their average, they are also weak against yds per rush #30 at 4.67....so they kinda match up, but KC has a lot of holes in their defense too, the Bengals have the better defense and they should hold their own here. Just don't see a blow out. This is the biggest game for them ever, they weren't even born for the last Bengals Super Bowl......for Kansas City it's just another game that they play every year. By the way look for KC to have a fumble on offense this week.

 

[statman03]

by the way does everybody know who the best sacking teams are ?
#1 Pittsburgh 58 avg 3.22 per game
#2 San Francisco 58 avg 3.05 per gm
#3 Minn 51 3.00 per game
#4 LA Rams 52 2.89 per gm

how about sack yards ?
#1 San Francisco 423 yds 22.74 per game
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6 LA Rams 382 yards 21.22 per game

guess Arron Donald and Von Miller aren't any better than Bossa and the boys

 

[crownreserve]

Cincy on offense.......their biggest weakness is being # 32 in both sacks and sack yds plus #25 in yds per rush, but Burrow don't seem to care he just takes them and plays on.......KC doesn't sack to much though #27 avg 1.8 sacks, what did they have against Buff, 2 just above their average, they are also weak against yds per rush #30 at 4.67....so they kinda match up, but KC has a lot of holes in their defense too, the Bengals have the better defense and they should hold their own here. Just don't see a blow out. This is the biggest game for them ever, they weren't even born for the last Bengals Super Bowl......for Kansas City it's just another game that they play every year. By the way look for KC to have a fumble on offense this week.

Why do you say they have a fumble? might be a good prop play

 

[Serbone]

Cincinnati underrated as usual. Your “play of the week” was Titans -3.5….of course you’d crap like this.

Burrow going to exploit a shitty Kansas City secondary yet again

You act like the Chiefs didn’t even try that first game in Cincy. Bullshit. They just got torched in the second half

Number 9 or 10 team? LMAO

Maybe they compete next year? Uhhhhh they’re in the fucking AFC championship game

Not even a nice try.
You just do not get it, that teams do not always go all out late in the season for seeding. I advised against a lot of teams week 14 & 15 & 16 and often the team that the idiot broadcasters said were fighting for seeding even though they had clinched a playoff or even clinched their division failed to cover, even lost the game. There is a long list, KC @ Cincy is just one of them.
Earlier you say Buffalo played a weak schedule, but then you say Cincy has a better defense.
Well Buffalo SOS is 31, Cincy 28. And Buffalo defense was rated #1, Cincy, #18, and they are dinged.
So: wrong, and wrong.
Burrow is good but will be a sitting duck, 9 sacks vs Titans, it will be similar this game, yes he can run straight ahead but Allen was spectacular, he is a fast, shifty, and powerful QB runner, they ran set plays he ran 11 times for 68 yards, Allen is what tore up KC. No way Burrow is in that category.
And, again, Cincy was very lucky to win both of those games, lots of calls for them vs LV and fluke plays + very poor coaching by the Titans.
KC (SOS 12) has been here before, better receivers, better QB, experienced in the big games, and will be able to deal with Burrow much better than the spectacular Allen, Cincy will be exposed, KC 41-20.

 

[G-Man!]

"then tell me when they played the Browns in Clevelands one of 4 only healthy games this season"

That game wasn't "in Clevelands" (sic) it was in Cincinnati.

You are misreading the sentence. lOL I never said the game was IN cleveland. It stated that in Cleveland's 1 of 4 games when they were healthy, they buried the Bengals.

 

[G-Man!]

Not even a nice try.
You just do not get it, that teams do not always go all out late in the season for seeding. I advised against a lot of teams week 14 & 15 & 16 and often the team that the idiot broadcasters said were fighting for seeding even though they had clinched a playoff or even clinched their division failed to cover, even lost the game. There is a long list, KC @ Cincy is just one of them.
Earlier you say Buffalo played a weak schedule, but then you say Cincy has a better defense.
Well Buffalo SOS is 31, Cincy 28. And Buffalo defense was rated #1, Cincy, #18, and they are dinged.
So: wrong, and wrong.
Burrow is good but will be a sitting duck, 9 sacks vs Titans, it will be similar this game, yes he can run straight ahead but Allen was spectacular, he is a fast, shifty, and powerful QB runner, they ran set plays he ran 11 times for 68 yards, Allen is what tore up KC. No way Burrow is in that category.
And, again, Cincy was very lucky to win both of those games, lots of calls for them vs LV and fluke plays + very poor coaching by the Titans.
KC (SOS 12) has been here before, better receivers, better QB, experienced in the big games, and will be able to deal with Burrow much better than the spectacular Allen, Cincy will be exposed, KC 41-20.

TRUE!

 

[Avocado33]

Not even a nice try.
You just do not get it, that teams do not always go all out late in the season for seeding. I advised against a lot of teams week 14 & 15 & 16 and often the team that the idiot broadcasters said were fighting for seeding even though they had clinched a playoff or even clinched their division failed to cover, even lost the game. There is a long list, KC @ Cincy is just one of them.
Earlier you say Buffalo played a weak schedule, but then you say Cincy has a better defense.
Well Buffalo SOS is 31, Cincy 28. And Buffalo defense was rated #1, Cincy, #18, and they are dinged.
So: wrong, and wrong.
Burrow is good but will be a sitting duck, 9 sacks vs Titans, it will be similar this game, yes he can run straight ahead but Allen was spectacular, he is a fast, shifty, and powerful QB runner, they ran set plays he ran 11 times for 68 yards, Allen is what tore up KC. No way Burrow is in that category.
And, again, Cincy was very lucky to win both of those games, lots of calls for them vs LV and fluke plays + very poor coaching by the Titans.
KC (SOS 12) has been here before, better receivers, better QB, experienced in the big games, and will be able to deal with Burrow much better than the spectacular Allen, Cincy will be exposed, KC 41-20.

Buffalo’s defense was overrated all season long. They beat the crap out of shitty teams and lost all close games. Their defense was PATHETIC against the Chiefs all night long. I don’t care about their ranking because it is a pure reflection of them laying it on bad teams.

Burrow had no offensive line and very little run game, yet still managed to go 28-37 for 350 against a better defense than he’ll face Sunday — especially considering the health of Chiefs DB’s. Spags loves to blitz and I think he’s too stubborn to go away from that. Good luck, because the Bengals have better weapons than the Bills. Burrow eats the blitz alive

Allen is a great player and obviously a wonderful performance this weekend, but I would argue Burrow had the better season. In fact, it’s pretty hard NOT to argue that. Burrow is not just good — he’s fucking great. And he’s already torched Kansas City once

I do think the Chiefs experience is an advantage for them and something to take seriously. I’m not discounting the possibility that they do win convincingly for that reason, though the match up here suggests a close game.

 

[BoutMyMoney]

Both games will be blowouts.

Chiefs big

Rams Bigger

 

[statman03]

I should have said lose a fumble.....KC is #32 in the league in fumbles lost at 0.72......although they were credited with a fumble against Buffalo they did not lose possession......their last lost fumble was against Pittsburgh......so they are overdue.....0.72 lost per game and none last game.....bingo they should lose one this game

 

[statman03]

yes I am predicting turnovers now

 

[BigLouReturns]

Chiefs -7 over Bengals.
Absolutely No Contest.

Rams ML -170 over San Fran.
Double Revenge Game.

Why play the money line when the SU winner in the conference finals is 89-12-1 ATS s/'70?

 

[brendanjack]

Why play the money line when the SU winner in the conference finals is 89-12-1 ATS s/'70?

Exactly Lou shouldn’t you be playing the alternate line so your on the + side of the dollar