Fore!

Search

New member
Joined
Nov 29, 2011
Messages
546
Tokens
Hey buddy, can you please explain your betting/scoring/results? I noticed you've hit a few longshots in the last couple months so went back to research your plays and I don't think I'm following... Or I don't think I know what "e.w." means. For instance, after your first two posts which were the Cadillac and Tampa Bay Championship it appears as though you were 0-13 for -13 units. But you listed 1-12 for 0 units. But then after Malaysia and Arnold Palmer you hit a nice one in Malaysia so I have you at 1-29 for +21 units but you have it as 3-27 +21. So units are the same, but record is different. Then after Trophy Hassan II/Houston Open it looks like you went 0-16 which would put you at 1-45 +5 units, but you have 5-41 +20 units, etc. See what I'm saying?

I thought "e.w" was an abbreviation for a sportsbook you use but perhaps it's a type of bet which is why I'm getting different numbers?

Thanks and keep up the good work! You've been hitting some nice ones...
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
1,503
Tokens
"e.w." is an "each way" bet, in which 1/2 of the stake is on a "Win" wager, and 1/2 the stake is on a "1/4 for Top 5" wager. My usual stakes are just $6.00 on the Win wager and $6.00 on the Top 5 wager, with some modest deviation. The "dead heat" rules apply when there are ties for multiple placings both within and without the Top 5 (i.e., a 3 way tie for 4th).

Two examples:

(1) With Brett Rumford last week, I won 80/1 on 0.5 units, and 20/1 on 0.5 units, for total winnings of (80 +20)/2 = 50 units.

(2) With Lucas Glover at 100/1 in the first week, I won nothing on 0.5 units, and 25/1 for 4th place on 0.5 units, for total winnings of (0 + 25)/2 = 12.5 units. By going 1-12 on my 13 e.w. wagers, I lost my stakes on 12.5 units, and got my stakes back on 0.5 winning units, so my 12.5 units of winnings "magically/ironically" were exactly equal to my 12.5 units of losing wagers, and I was +0.00*.

GL
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
1,503
Tokens
By the way, I did not hedge my wager on Lucas Glover last week, even when the odds were about -260 on "Not Win" on Saturday night, but that's the way I usually roll. A few exceptions, like maybe trying to get an "in-running" wager during a playoff, but even then I was "all in" last week with Rumford during his playoff.


GL
 

New member
Joined
Nov 29, 2011
Messages
546
Tokens
"e.w." is an "each way" bet, in which 1/2 of the stake is on a "Win" wager, and 1/2 the stake is on a "1/4 for Top 5" wager. My usual stakes are just $6.00 on the Win wager and $6.00 on the Top 5 wager, with some modest deviation. The "dead heat" rules apply when there are ties for multiple placings both within and without the Top 5 (i.e., a 3 way tie for 4th).

Two examples:

(1) With Brett Rumford last week, I won 80/1 on 0.5 units, and 20/1 on 0.5 units, for total winnings of (80 +20)/2 = 50 units.

(2) With Lucas Glover at 100/1 in the first week, I won nothing on 0.5 units, and 25/1 for 4th place on 0.5 units, for total winnings of (0 + 25)/2 = 12.5 units. By going 1-12 on my 13 e.w. wagers, I lost my stakes on 12.5 units, and got my stakes back on 0.5 winning units, so my 12.5 units of winnings "magically/ironically" were exactly equal to my 12.5 units of losing wagers, and I was +0.00*.

GL

Interesting. What books do you use for these each way plays?
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
1,503
Tokens
I almost forgot to post here . . .


Wells Fargo:

Outrights:

Kyle Stanley(80/1) e.w.
Kevin Stadler(100/1) e.w.
John Huh(100/1) e.w.
Lucas Glover(66/1) e.w.
Bill Haas(28/1) e.w.
Sergio Garcia(22/1) e.w.
Russell Henley(66/1) e.w.
Lee Westwood(18/1) e.w.
- - The greens being what they are, I have no problem swerving away from the market leaders (Westwood and Simpson to be specific) for higher priced outsiders, although the prices have certainly fallen through attrition and such . . . I still be tracking Glover for Sawgrass, and a missed cut this week would sort of enhance that opportunity, but he can come good here instead, and sadly the weekend birdie rush for the contenders last week was a bridge too far . . . I've been waiting on Stanley, but it looks like I'm waiting no more, and he could arrive at this big boy venue with the training wheels off . . . Stadler IMO is clearly in the best form of his life, and the greens may well suit his chances . . . Huh was tracking decent IMO before the bounce that comes from finishing 11th at the Masters . . . Henley has tapped a solid vein of form and has really significant connections to this place . . . I don't think the greens favor Garcia's temperament, but I had my eyes on him coming in . . . Haas is not a million miles away . . . O.K., I'll let Westwood as a newly-minted 40-something carry my cash as the two-putt machine.

GL
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
1,503
Tokens
Interesting. What books do you use for these each way plays?

I have an internet acquaintance who can get my wagers on for me at most of the British books for any picks I finalize by early Wednesday evening, including all my wagers on specialty markets like Top European, First Round Leader, or Top Debutant, and then also my occasional in-running wager during the event, and any ante-post wagers made far in advance of the majors, and occasional plays on the LPGA or Champions Tours.

However, I do a lot of my capping on Wednesday night and Thursday morning when all my customary sources for INFORMATION and ANGLES have all weighed in, so only about 1/2 of my picks get sorted and finalized by early Wednesday evening. (Wednesday night and Thursday morning is also when I make the time to do any write-ups, although I find just posting my picks without comment has a far better track record of success for me over the years, so I get superstitious about furnishing commentary, even though I enjoy doing it.) So my plays from Wednesday night and Thursday morning are usually just made at 5dimes, where the Win odds are often much better and the Top 5 odds worse, but I still post my plays using the odds at the generally available British golf books at the time I post, even though I may have actually gotten a better price earlier in the week. (For instance I added John Huh this morning at 5dimes, with actual Win odds of 115/1, and Top 5 odds of only 22/1.) (Lucas Glover is the one exception to that rule, as I am on him every week, and his best price is down to 50/1 this morning.)


GL
 

New member
Joined
Nov 29, 2011
Messages
546
Tokens
Outrights YTD: 10-93 (+75.89*)
Matchups YTD: 10-10 (-0.05*)

Thanks, Rounder. :toast:

I hadn't been doing very well with my golf wagers for some time, but had definitely been putting in some full efforts since the start of this season, so I decided to start posting my plays on the forum, and it has worked out well so far. Maybe it will continue for a while, maybe not.


Volvo China Open:

Outrights:

Victor Dubuisson(33/1) e.w.
Paul Lawrie(40/1) e.w.
Brett Rumford(50/1) e.w.
David Howell(40/1) e.w.
Ignacio Garrido(125/1) e.w
Lian-Wei Zhang(200/1) e.w 1st Round Leader
- - At this point I'd say I'm liking the depth of my roster that is taking shape for Charlotte much more than my roster in China, but it really comes down to being right with just one selection . . . An expansive coastal Pete Dye course in smog-ridden industrial China that seems to have rather generous fairways and rather spacious and undulating greens amidst lots of hazards feels somewhat like an anachronism, and a style not easy to fit with many players . . . I can probably pick up my winning marker on Rumford, but I won't . . . Lawrie seems about ready to have his first big week of the season, and the venue doesn't turn me off from a possible match . . . Dubuisson seems more than capable . . . Garrido IMO seems in a better place with his game than he was when he finished 11th here last year . . . Howell is a cool dude amongst the teenagers . . . And May 2 is Zhang's birthday, and he may have a good turn in him.

GL

Rumford again!! Unreal... Nice work my man.
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
1,503
Tokens
Outrights YTD: 13-104 (+101.52*)
Matchups YTD: 10-10 (-0.05*)


ODDS and ENDS:

(A) I AM SO NOT DUE right now . . . I am never reluctant to post any of my plays before an event, although I do get particular about the order in which I post the plays on various forums, and then there are times when I won't post in-running plays because of the vibe it gives me about plays I've already posted. And I really do enjoy including comments and INFORMATION and such with my plays (it's the funnest part), even though that takes time away from my capping. But my real rituals about posting plays are when I'm in a slump, and then I really get in a mind set of posting only the plays, and not offering any cryptic comments or reasons, but at most offering some links or observations in an entirely separate post. But when I'm out of a slump, I often can't keep my yap shut. I AM SO NOT DUE right now.

(B) It's always been a rule of mine that I need a strong reason or belief to pick up a winning marker (one of the few examples which comes to mind was after Boo Weekley chipped in on the last two holes to win his first tournament at Harbour Town, when I was confident his chances were zero/nada/no way the following week, and I was absolutely right). Other than that, the winning marker stays, and now Brett Rumford has sweetly reinforced my notion . . . So now Adam Scott makes his first appearance since Augusta, and I don't really fancy his chances, but with his immaculate game, there is no way I'll be picking up his marker . . . I can't see me not giving him a chance to carry my cash at Merion, either.

(C) Three ANGLES are always my starting point for capping The Players: (1) From my 2006 notes:"Only four players have won more than once on the Stadium Course. Tiger Woods credits the diversity to "the nature of the design." "How Pete (Dye) designed it with the cutoff bunkers and the mounding that it just brings all of us together,” said Woods, who hasn’t earned a top-10 at The Players since his 2001 triumph. “We're all hitting the balls to the same spots. A lot of times for the longer hitters, it's 3-wood or 2-iron or some kind of utility club off the tees where the shorter guys are hitting drivers, so we're all in the same spot. With that in mind, it becomes a second shot course and see who can hit their irons the best and put themselves in positions where they can make putts.”"; (2) Even when you can find a few golfers that really seem to like the place (Stephen Ames or Ben Crane or Luke Donald as possible examples), the fact is that unlike Augusta or the U.S. Open which have some well-defined specialists, almost everyone has a spotty record at Sawgrass. In addition, it's a venue that definitely favors champions with some experience, including at least one good turn through the championship on their CV. On the other side of the coin, although there are some players who really love Sawgrass (being few and far between), you get the sense there is no shortage of players the venue just does not suit, and their record reflects it . . . I think other cappers have spotted similar trend lines and offered similar takes, and one set of observations I particularly like in 2012 and 2011: "7/10 winners International players,Ball strikers track,Bermuda Greens,course form does not seem that important,whilst being in decent current form does with the places littered with players with Good recent finishes,Winners have had Multiple runs at the course,Power not an issue,Total Accuracy has been a key stat . . . since 2003, the average number of starts for a winner before he broke through at THE PLAYERS was 7.57. (That included two-time champion, Davis Love III -- 1992, 2003 -- whose first triumph came in his seventh appearance.) Lo and behold, Tim Clark supported the theory that experience matters at TPC Sawgrass, as he emerged victorious in what was his eighth start"; and (3) I really don't have much of a problem swerving prices on the top tier of market leaders like Donald and Garcia, and if they get it done, more power to them. (NOTE: I thought that this week the Betfair forum offered an uncharacteristically smart capping discussion, and is worthy of a link: THE PLAYERS. > Betfair Community > Golf .)

(D) The Players championship IMO closely resembles the four majors in some significant attributes when it comes to capping, including my focus and approach of trying to track players for weeks or even months heading in for their chances of peaking at this extra large event. And when play begins, you better know the players will have a long week of grinding in front of them . . . This year I have an exceptionally large short list, and while I feel I've done a decent job of finding names I'm really comfortable dropping, it was a really long list(!) when I started on Sunday morning. . . And in another similarity with the majors, it's a fact I have a far better capping record in the four majors and The Players than I do in the week-in-and-week-out of the regular tours (although the U.S. PGA is the exception in that run of success), quite possibly because of the effort I give, but I think it's based more on a solid catechism of knowing what I like (and don't particularly like) around each of those events.

(E) So my big scores in this championship have been Stephen Ames(150/1) in 2006, which was one of my strongest plays of that season; Adam Scott(33/1) in 2004; and Davis Love(6/1) in-running for Win Only on Friday night in 2003, which at a "whopping" $24.00 is still my largest wager ever on an "outright" play with "long shot" odds (and in my low stakes world, that wager paid off as well as a 33/1 e.w. wager using my normal stakes). . . . But what I most remember right now about my wagers in this event is that David Toms(80/1) was my strongest play all year in 2011, maybe one of my four or six strongest golf plays ever, had been building in my mind for weeks, and after brilliantly building a 3 stroke lead through the 7th hole on Sunday, it got away from him even though he really did very little wrong; then a bit of a repeat the next year when Zach Johnson(80/1) was one of my strongest golf plays in 2012, building in my mind for weeks, as Zach was rising from a disappointing 2011 campaign to establish what I was fairly certain were going to be his credentials for a place on the Ryder Cup team, and I was thankful he holed a long putt on the 72nd hole for a rock solid week at T2 . . . So now we get to 2013, and it's a fact that Lucas Glover is the name I've been tracking for this spot and for this event for even longer than I did Toms or Zach or Ames. However, as I've already noted, this event is like a major when it comes to the contenders having a long week of grinding in front of them, and now that G-Lover has sort of "popped early" two weeks ago, and to my way of thinking probably used up instead of built up his store of emotional capital last week in Charlotte, I just can't say this sets up the way I pictured it over the last two months. With the added development of his being ready to leave the course at the drop of the hat if his wife goes in to labor, I'm just thankful the price has help up pretty well on what I would no longer characterize as anything approaching a Toms-esque play.

(F) In my capping I know I'm still not using twitter like I could or should to mine for valuable nuggets of INFORMATION and ANGLES, and since golfobserver.com faded away, I don't have that library of media coverage just lying there for me to access whenever I make the time to do it. But for the umpteenth time I'll repeat that my richest vein of ANGLES and INFORMATION comes from what I see and hear while watching the television coverage, and from tracking the live scoring consoles for hours and seeing or thinking I'm seeing tell-tale signs, and in that regard my capping for the first four months of this season has been as diligent as any in recent years, and it seems the harder I've worked the luckier I've gotten. Accordingly, even my natural pessimism doesn't lead me to expect a cache of clunker picks this week, but I AM SO NOT DUE right now.

(G) I mentioned it was a long short list this week (I wish I could scan in my sheet and post a link sort of showing "twenty seven eight-by-ten colour glossy pictures with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one"), so I should probably give mention to some of the names left on the cutting room floor (so far), to-wit, Karlsson, Stanley, Donald, Van Pelt, and Streelman; and Garcia, Haas, O'Hair, Horschel and Zach: and Stricker, Pettersson . . .


OUTRIGHTS:

Jim Furyk(66/1) e.w.
- - I've been tracking the Pennsylvania native for the U.S. Open at Merion, certainly grinding for a chance to match the redemption Payne Stewart achieved at Pinehurst after his Olympic experience. But I'll give the Jacksonville area resident a shot at something else he covets, and have taken the excellent price that comes with it.

Ben Crane(110/1) e.w.
- - Value losers are common place. How about a value winner for a change?

Ian Poulter(70/1) e.w.
- - Many of the reasons to like his chances fit the profile of past winners, and being based in Florida only adds to his appeal.

Tim Clark(66/1) e.w.
- - Prominent on my radar since Hawaii, when Johnny Miller sort of raved about the big year he saw coming based on improvements in his swing. I wish his Masters had been a disappointment rather than a success, but I could be wrong about that.

Graeme McDowell(40/1) e.w.
- - I wish he was still trying to put a signature stamp on his season, but he still ticks boxes.

Lucas Glover(125/1) e.w.
- - I think there was enough substance in my months of tracking this play so it doesn't fall flat, but magic is what I'm after.

Brian Davis(150/1) e.w.
- - The Len Mattiace of my picks, whatever the hell that means

Stewart Cink(125/1) e.w.
- - In a season shaping up as a good one, sort of feels like the right time and the right place for another solid step, maybe it blossoms into a beauty.

Henrik Stenson(66/1) e.w.

- - With Scott, Clark and Stenson on my roster, I sort of concluded the prospects of landing a repeat champion don't seem all that remote to me.

Steve Stricker(50/1) e.w.
- - Despite what I said above about names left on the cutting room floor, this is the first one I added back, as his late odds suddenly strike me as almost stunning vis-a-vis the character of his 2013 campaign to date.

U.S. Open:
Jim Furyk(50/1) e.w.
- - I've been tracking the Pennsylvania native for the U.S. Open at Merion, certainly grinding for a chance to match the redemption Payne Stewart achieved at Pinehurst after his Olympic experience. But I'll give the Jacksonville area resident a shot at something else he covets, and take the excellent price that comes with it.


MATCHUPS:

McDowell(-120) over Snedeker (Tournament)
Walker(-150) over Harrington (Tournament)


GL
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
1,503
Tokens
Outrights . . .

Adam Scott(18/1) e.w.

- - Not picking up his winning marker; see discussion above.

GL
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
1,503
Tokens
Outrights YTD: 14-115 (+92.61*)
Matchups YTD: 11-12 (-1.80*)


Madeira Islands Open:

Outrights:

Alvaro Velasco(50/1) e.w.
Damien McGrane(50/1) e.w.
Daniel Vancsik(100/1) e.w.

GL
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
1,503
Tokens
Byron Nelson:

Outrights:

Marc Leishman(20/1) e.w.
Charley Hoffman(55/1) e.w.
J.J. Henry(125/1) e.w.
Jordan Spieth(35/1) e.w.
Fredrik Jacobson(45/1) e.w.
Justin Leonard(200/1) e.w.
Tim Herron(200/1) e.w.
Sean O'Hair(125/1) e.w.

GL
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
1,503
Tokens
Volvo Matchplay:

Brett Rumford(28/1)(1/2 for 1-2)
- - Forgot to let it ride, rectified now, but not lilely to cash.

GL
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
1,503
Tokens
Outrights YTD: 14-127 (+80.61*)
Matchups YTD: 11-12 (-1.80*)


BMW PGA Championship:

Outrights:

Ross Fisher(66/1) e.w.
Marcel Siem(50/1) e.w.
David Howell(110/1) e.w.
David Horsey(66/1) e.w.
Steve Webster(150/1) e.w.
Richard Sterne(50/1) e.w.
Colin Montgomerie(400/1) e.w.
Chris Wood (75/1) e.w.

GL
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
1,503
Tokens
Outrights:


Crowne Plaza (Colonial):

Tim Clark(50/1) e.w.
Ryan Palmer(40/1) e.w.
Ben Crane(40/1) e.w.
Zach Johnson(14/1) e.w.
David Lingmerth(110/1) e.w.
Justin Leonard(175/1) e.w.
Marc Leishman(33/1) e.w.


Senior P.G.A.:

Rocco Mediate(18/1) e.w.


GL
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
1,503
Tokens
Outrights YTD: 15-142 (+66.86*)
Matchups YTD: 11-12 (-1.80*)


Nordea Masters:


Outrights:

Joost Luiten(70/1) e.w.
Mikko Ilonen(33/1) e.w.
Darren Clarke(160/1) e.w.
Anders Hansen(50/1) e.w.
Romain Wattel(80/1) e.w.
Johan Edfors(125/1) e.w.
Thomas Levet(300/1) e.w.
David Drysdale(125/1) e.w.

GL
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
1,503
Tokens
The site was down . . . my plays . . .

Memorial:

Outrights:

Charl Schwartzel(33/1) e.w.
Kevin Streelman(80/1) e.w.
Kyle Stanley(125/1) e.w.
Marc Leishman(100/1) e.w.
Lucas Glover(200/1) e.w.
Bo Van Pelt(60/1) e.w.
Ricky Barnes(250/1) e.w.

GL
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
1,503
Tokens
Outrights YTD: 17-155 (+89.61*)
Matchups YTD: 11-12 (-1.80*)


Lyoness Open:

Outrights:

Thomas Bjorn(20/1) e.w.
Mark Tullo(66/1) e.w.
Rhys Davies(80/1) e.w.

GL
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,120,379
Messages
13,581,076
Members
100,978
Latest member
vijayhomeservices
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com