right but you think it would that the past legends numbers would be would exceed or even be comparable to today's greats?
Then why didn't fight Pacman 5 years ago ??
Back in the day, you fought the #1 contenders ... or lose your Belt...
sure you can bypass a little, but then you had to fight.
and you did say Majority ... so you know he ducked a few
There is little to no pride in boxing anymore, its all about the money. Similar problems with NBA and NFL, which is one reason many hardcore fans of those sports prefer college ball. Its all about branding yourself and no one has done a better job of that than Floyd.
you cant blame floyd solely for the fight not being made 5 or 6 yrs ago. all he did was ask for a drug test, which pac denied. also, if you notice, since then pac hasnt ko'd anyone. coincidence? prob not imo.
next i said majority bc his early fights were against top notch contenders. i dont buy the whole floyd ducking opponent thing. if thats the case, every fighter ducks someone at some point in their career.
you cant blame floyd solely for the fight not being made 5 or 6 yrs ago. all he did was ask for a drug test, which pac denied. also, if you notice, since then pac hasnt ko'd anyone. coincidence? prob not imo.
next i said majority bc his early fights were against top notch contenders. i dont buy the whole floyd ducking opponent thing. if thats the case, every fighter ducks someone at some point in their career.
Amir Khan is marginal. He has some hand speed but no jaw. Maybe if Floyd declined greatly he could beat him.
The reason Floyd didn't fight him a few years ago was because it would've looked awful to pick him based on recent resume. Then Maidana tied him up for a year and now we're here.