LeadWeight2020 said:Ace,
Thank you for your reply. I think I'll just wait for the new spreadsheet. This is really great, and much appreciated.
I willl definitlely help out if I can, but I am not great with Excel. I would like to give back though, as you have given to me and others. Would it be of assistance for me to attempt a college spreadsheet? If yes, then I will. If more competent people are on it then I'll sit tight for most likely a better product.
I'm sending you an email now.
Knockout said:I'm just waiting for certain websites to start posting lines. Some places posted lines that had the chalk right next to it. So it instead of -3 -130, it read it as -133 when I imported the lines. Once I find a good site, should only take 1 day. I expect to be done w/in the next 2 weeks.
Toujours Pret said:Aces, being an almost total computer illiterate, I'll follow your lead and do 'em on paper. Finished my 32 sheets today. Now all I need is some data to put on 'em. Best wishes for '06.
ACE-ACE said:YOU DONT DO ANYTHING...A BYE WEEK IS JUST A BYE WEEK....MOST OF THE TIME IT ONLY STOPS 4 TEAMS OF THE 32 TEAMS....SO THOSE 4 TEAM GET NO STATS THAT WEEK...ITS THAT EASY
Trapstar said:So, for instance in Week 4, one team has already taken their bye and they are playing against a team that hasn't had a bye. Obviously, the team with more games should (potentially) have more penalties and could have more turnovers simply b/c they've played an extra game. If I am understanding correctly, the calculation of my line does not care about that fact and you compare the year's totals regardless of games played. Is that correct?
Thanks for your help and wisdom.
Drpzne said:Ace,
Have you tried putting in an average of all the stats for the previous games played for a team coming off a bye week? Does it make any difference?
-DZ-.