Evidence suggests Trump will be impeached

Search

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
Nothing to see here...







Reuters Politics



@ReutersPolitics










BREAKING: FBI raid on Monday included both office and residence of Trump lawyer Michael Cohen - law enforcement source

For this to happen a federal judge must have seen probable cause of at least one crime in order to approve. Hope this idiot has a good lawyer.

Anything to keep the false narrative of "Russian Collusion" going to give the sheep some hope to "Resist!".... BTW: "..... The search does not appear to be directly related to Mr. Mueller’s investigation, but likely resulted from information he had uncovered and gave to prosecutors in New York."

So what does this have to do with "Russia" again?
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,365
Tokens
Anything to keep the false narrative of "Russian Collusion" going to give the sheep some hope to "Resist!".... BTW: "..... The search does not appear to be directly related to Mr. Mueller’s investigation, but likely resulted from information he had uncovered and gave to prosecutors in New York."

So what does this have to do with "Russia" again?

Further evidence that Mueller was never appointed to "investigate possible collusion with Russia" but get Trump at all costs.

This raid was an intimidation move, just like Manafort.

Russia! Russia! Russia! LMFAO!
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Flynn’s plea doesn’t prove collusion (Sorry, Dems, 'Collusion' Outrage Is Running Out of Steam)
By Ed Rogers December 1 at 12:30 PM

Friday morning’s guilty plea from former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn is a major disappointment for Democrats.

Flynn admitting to having made false statements is nowhere near where the Democrats want this to go. Of course, the story is big and the fact that a former White House official has been charged with anything and pleaded guilty is consequential, but it doesn’t suggest any collusion occurred and it doesn’t even get close to confirming that Donald Trump or his campaign was somehow complicit in a nefarious scheme.


Democrats are already straining themselves trying to suggest that Flynn’s plea is just the beginning and that there is more to come. But as far as Flynn is concerned, that is unlikely. It is just wishful thinking on their part. It’s not as though he pleaded guilty only to leave unresolved matters for later.


Commentators are saying Flynn’s plea couldn’t come at a worse time for the president. As Republicans are on the brink of passing this administration’s most important legislative initiative with the GOP-led tax reform bill, some in the media have gone so far as to suggest Flynn’s admission of guilt may disrupt the tax bill’s vote count in Congress. Well, a note to the political geniuses in the liberal mainstream media: There isn’t one Republican member of Congress thinking, “Gee, Flynn pleaded guilty to something or another. Maybe I won’t vote for a tax cut.” It just doesn’t work that way.


Once the dust settles, the Democrats and their media allies will realize that there is nothing more to this story than what Flynn has admitted to. Commentators are saying Flynn has agreed to cooperate, as if that is something new. The fact is, there was never a time when Flynn wasn’t cooperating. He has been a cooperating witness since special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s investigation began.

The Democrats won’t admit it, but they are throwing in the towel on collusion. Their only choice now is to prop up the convoluted claim of obstruction of justice, and that could go on forever. The ordeal may be bothersome for the White House, but it won’t be fatal.


Oh and by the way, let’s reflect on what has happened in this investigation so far. Paul Manafort and Rick Gates were indicted on matters associated with foreign-agent registration and money laundering that predated any engagement they had with Trump. Flynn has pleaded guilty to a crime that occurred after the campaign was over.

To be precise, none of this involves the president or his campaign. It’s all ugly and ragged, but this White House has a lot of ugly and ragged.


Even if Flynn says he was instructed by the president to be in touch with the Russians, so what? All that would mean is the president-elect told his national security adviser to do his job. Don’t be fooled by the breathless, desperate reaction from the usual suspects. As far as the White House is concerned, the Flynn guilty plea is a 4 on a scale from 1 to 10.


Sorry, Democrats. The investigations and “collusion” outrage are running out of steam, well short of reaching the president’s doorstep.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2017/12/01/flynns-plea-doesnt-prove-collusion/?utm_term=.d0a33cb1e992

bjitte.jpg


2TZ6X_vSa9182QAxe0UtKNF9F7gzQPV3DwC0WgJH7mA.png

2TZ6X_vSa9182QAxe0UtKNF9F7gzQPV3DwC0WgJH7mA.png

Running out of steam, ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
Flynn’s plea doesn’t prove collusion (Sorry, Dems, 'Collusion' Outrage Is Running Out of Steam)
By Ed Rogers December 1 at 12:30 PM

Friday morning’s guilty plea from former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn is a major disappointment for Democrats.

Flynn admitting to having made false statements is nowhere near where the Democrats want this to go. Of course, the story is big and the fact that a former White House official has been charged with anything and pleaded guilty is consequential, but it doesn’t suggest any collusion occurred and it doesn’t even get close to confirming that Donald Trump or his campaign was somehow complicit in a nefarious scheme.


Democrats are already straining themselves trying to suggest that Flynn’s plea is just the beginning and that there is more to come. But as far as Flynn is concerned, that is unlikely. It is just wishful thinking on their part. It’s not as though he pleaded guilty only to leave unresolved matters for later.


Commentators are saying Flynn’s plea couldn’t come at a worse time for the president. As Republicans are on the brink of passing this administration’s most important legislative initiative with the GOP-led tax reform bill, some in the media have gone so far as to suggest Flynn’s admission of guilt may disrupt the tax bill’s vote count in Congress. Well, a note to the political geniuses in the liberal mainstream media: There isn’t one Republican member of Congress thinking, “Gee, Flynn pleaded guilty to something or another. Maybe I won’t vote for a tax cut.” It just doesn’t work that way.


Once the dust settles, the Democrats and their media allies will realize that there is nothing more to this story than what Flynn has admitted to. Commentators are saying Flynn has agreed to cooperate, as if that is something new. The fact is, there was never a time when Flynn wasn’t cooperating. He has been a cooperating witness since special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s investigation began.

The Democrats won’t admit it, but they are throwing in the towel on collusion. Their only choice now is to prop up the convoluted claim of obstruction of justice, and that could go on forever. The ordeal may be bothersome for the White House, but it won’t be fatal.


Oh and by the way, let’s reflect on what has happened in this investigation so far. Paul Manafort and Rick Gates were indicted on matters associated with foreign-agent registration and money laundering that predated any engagement they had with Trump. Flynn has pleaded guilty to a crime that occurred after the campaign was over.

To be precise, none of this involves the president or his campaign. It’s all ugly and ragged, but this White House has a lot of ugly and ragged.


Even if Flynn says he was instructed by the president to be in touch with the Russians, so what? All that would mean is the president-elect told his national security adviser to do his job. Don’t be fooled by the breathless, desperate reaction from the usual suspects. As far as the White House is concerned, the Flynn guilty plea is a 4 on a scale from 1 to 10.


Sorry, Democrats. The investigations and “collusion” outrage are running out of steam, well short of reaching the president’s doorstep.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2017/12/01/flynns-plea-doesnt-prove-collusion/?utm_term=.d0a33cb1e992

bjitte.jpg


2TZ6X_vSa9182QAxe0UtKNF9F7gzQPV3DwC0WgJH7mA.png

2TZ6X_vSa9182QAxe0UtKNF9F7gzQPV3DwC0WgJH7mA.png

It never had steam since day 1....

Can anyone name 1 person on Trumps Campaign, Transition team or Administration that has been indicted or charged with any "Russian" collusion, meddling , or interference? .... I bet no one can name 1 single person.

All the left has is dwindling hope... lies, and deflection from the facts... then the insults cause they dont want to face reality lol
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,365
Tokens
It never had steam since day 1....

Can anyone name 1 person on Trumps Campaign, Transition team or Administration that has been indicted or charged with any "Russian" collusion, meddling , or interference? .... I bet no one can name 1 single person.

All the left has is dwindling hope... lies, and deflection from the facts... then the insults cause they dont want to face reality lol

Nothing more than opposition research for 2020 on behalf of the Democrats and YOU are paying for it.

Mueller and his deep state hacks are truly despicable human beings. Almost as bad as Crooked Hillary and the Kenyan Degenerate.

How is this raid remotely legal? What is the crime??
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
90,924
Tokens
Evidence suggests that 919 should be committed.

Asshole Liberal
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,365
Tokens
New York Times: Trump impeachment 'neither a sensible nor a winning issue'

by Eddie Scarry

November 07, 2018 11:30 AM

The left-leaning New York Times editorial board is cautioning Democrats, who just regained power in the House after Tuesday's elections, against seizing on the chance to impeach President Trump with their new majority.

"Impeachment is neither a sensible nor a winning issue to open with," the paper said Wednesday. "Even many Americans who dislike Mr. Trump will, absent overwhelming evidence of impeachable offenses, balk at efforts to remove a sitting president."

Though Democrats took enough seats to win back the House, Republicans expanded their majority in the Senate, making Trump's removal from office all but impossible if politics has anything to do with the decision.

Some Democrats, including Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., have aggressively called for impeachment. The Times said if findings by special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation implicate Trump directly, impeachment could still be an option.

"Democrats would do well to wait and see if the investigation by the special counsel, Robert Mueller, turns up high crimes and misdemeanors before deciding whether to pursue the painful and divisive path of impeachment," said the Times. "If so, they’ll want to bring along at least some of their Republican colleagues."

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...chment-neither-a-sensible-nor-a-winning-issue

 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,365
Tokens
Heh heh heh...that sound you hear is the Rat base deflating.

Fortunately, rats are not sensible. They will likely follow the Mad Maxine approach and go full retard on impeachment.

Which will backfire on them...yuuuuuuugely!
 

Never bet against America.
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
8,491
Tokens
Hope they try now for impeachment. Makes for good theatrical comedy watching them behave the way they do.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,365
Tokens
Democrats are about to impeach a popular president for...obstructing a hoax. Seriously... face)(*^%

Good luck finding those 18 Republican votes, you sore losers.

Poor Pelosi has been extremely cautious about going full retard on impeachment because she knows it's all for show and voters are going to stick it right up their asses, but she can't control the bartender, the Mooslim terrorists and other radical nuts apparently now running the Democrat party.

looney_left_1_xlarge.jpg
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,877
Tokens
Only someone who is mentally handicapped would bump this thread about a party line vote for impeachment regarding a matter that was not public record when the thread was created.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,121
Tokens
evidence in this case? a partisan house

WINNING

PS: you know the OP was aiming much higher, and his political sidekicks are disappointed in the results
 

Never bet against America.
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
8,491
Tokens
And where are we now on this HOT topic?

Who got it wrong and who got it right? Heh heh
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,814
Messages
13,573,565
Members
100,877
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com