How the FUCK is long time Republican Mueller, in an atmosphere controlled by Republicans, a "dirty cop," you brainless putz?? What exactly is Mueller's motive for screwing over a Republican president if that president was actually innocent?:think2: And, I hate to break it to you, but something tells me that Mueller was just busted for lying when he gave him the deal-just like he took that into account with Papadop. Like they say in Vegas, "Trust EVERYBODY, but cut the cards." Mueller obviously has corroborating evidence in the case against Papadop(read: wired conversations), and he will with Flynn, too-probably in the form of all the records Flynn has to turn over, if he hasn't done so already. For all WE know, Flynn was taping all those secret meetings he had with Sergei. Yesterday I saw the number of people, Russian and American, implicated in secret meeting, and that number was NINETEEN, but YOU believe Twittler was completely unaware of all of that, which makes you a fucking moron.
How the FUCK is long time Republican Mueller, in an atmosphere controlled by Republicans, a "dirty cop," you brainless putz?? What exactly is Mueller's motive for screwing over a Republican president if that president was actually innocent?:think2: And, I hate to break it to you, but something tells me that Mueller was just busted for lying when he gave him the deal-just like he took that into account with Papadop. Like they say in Vegas, "Trust EVERYBODY, but cut the cards." Mueller obviously has corroborating evidence in the case against Papadop(read: wired conversations), and he will with Flynn, too-probably in the form of all the records Flynn has to turn over, if he hasn't done so already. For all WE know, Flynn was taping all those secret meetings he had with Sergei. Yesterday I saw the number of people, Russian and American, implicated in secret meeting, and that number was NINETEEN, but YOU believe Twittler was completely unaware of all of that, which makes you a fucking moron.
This one's gonna leave a mark on duhhhhhhhhhhfelch...
CNN: White House claims Obama admin approved Flynn calls with Russian ambassador
"The White House said on Friday that it was the Obama administration that authorized former national security adviser Michael Flynn's contacts with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak during President Trump's transition, according to CNN."
http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...obama-admin-approved-flynn-calls-with-russian
So, using duhhhhhhhhfelch logic, The Dirty Cop should investigate Obama?
CNN: White House claims Obama admin approved Flynn calls with Russian ambassador
"The White House said on Friday that it was the Obama administration that authorized former national security adviser Michael Flynn's contacts with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak during President Trump's transition, according to CNN."
http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...obama-admin-approved-flynn-calls-with-russian
So, using duhhhhhhhhfelch logic, The Dirty Cop should investigate Obama?
This one's gonna leave a mark on duhhhhhhhhhhfelch...
CNN: White House claims Obama admin approved Flynn calls with Russian ambassador
"The White House said on Friday that it was the Obama administration that authorized former national security adviser Michael Flynn's contacts with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak during President Trump's transition, according to CNN."
http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...obama-admin-approved-flynn-calls-with-russian
So, using duhhhhhhhhfelch logic, The Dirty Cop should investigate Obama?
Oh, the WHITE HOUSE says this, so, of course, it MUST be true, as they have such an outstanding record of transparency and honesty, right? ROTFLMAO!!!!! Sheriff Jagoff, wrong as usual...
Flynn’s plea doesn’t prove collusion (Sorry, Dems, 'Collusion' Outrage Is Running Out of Steam)
By Ed Rogers December 1 at 12:30 PM
Friday morning’s guilty plea from former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn is a major disappointment for Democrats.
Flynn admitting to having made false statements is nowhere near where the Democrats want this to go. Of course, the story is big and the fact that a former White House official has been charged with anything and pleaded guilty is consequential, but it doesn’t suggest any collusion occurred and it doesn’t even get close to confirming that Donald Trump or his campaign was somehow complicit in a nefarious scheme.
Democrats are already straining themselves trying to suggest that Flynn’s plea is just the beginning and that there is more to come. But as far as Flynn is concerned, that is unlikely. It is just wishful thinking on their part. It’s not as though he pleaded guilty only to leave unresolved matters for later.
Commentators are saying Flynn’s plea couldn’t come at a worse time for the president. As Republicans are on the brink of passing this administration’s most important legislative initiative with the GOP-led tax reform bill, some in the media have gone so far as to suggest Flynn’s admission of guilt may disrupt the tax bill’s vote count in Congress. Well, a note to the political geniuses in the liberal mainstream media: There isn’t one Republican member of Congress thinking, “Gee, Flynn pleaded guilty to something or another. Maybe I won’t vote for a tax cut.” It just doesn’t work that way.
Once the dust settles, the Democrats and their media allies will realize that there is nothing more to this story than what Flynn has admitted to. Commentators are saying Flynn has agreed to cooperate, as if that is something new. The fact is, there was never a time when Flynn wasn’t cooperating. He has been a cooperating witness since special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s investigation began.
The Democrats won’t admit it, but they are throwing in the towel on collusion. Their only choice now is to prop up the convoluted claim of obstruction of justice, and that could go on forever. The ordeal may be bothersome for the White House, but it won’t be fatal.
Oh and by the way, let’s reflect on what has happened in this investigation so far. Paul Manafort and Rick Gates were indicted on matters associated with foreign-agent registration and money laundering that predated any engagement they had with Trump. Flynn has pleaded guilty to a crime that occurred after the campaign was over.
To be precise, none of this involves the president or his campaign. It’s all ugly and ragged, but this White House has a lot of ugly and ragged.
Even if Flynn says he was instructed by the president to be in touch with the Russians, so what? All that would mean is the president-elect told his national security adviser to do his job. Don’t be fooled by the breathless, desperate reaction from the usual suspects. As far as the White House is concerned, the Flynn guilty plea is a 4 on a scale from 1 to 10.
Sorry, Democrats. The investigations and “collusion” outrage are running out of steam, well short of reaching the president’s doorstep.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2017/12/01/flynns-plea-doesnt-prove-collusion/?utm_term=.d0a33cb1e992
By Ed Rogers December 1 at 12:30 PM
Friday morning’s guilty plea from former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn is a major disappointment for Democrats.
Flynn admitting to having made false statements is nowhere near where the Democrats want this to go. Of course, the story is big and the fact that a former White House official has been charged with anything and pleaded guilty is consequential, but it doesn’t suggest any collusion occurred and it doesn’t even get close to confirming that Donald Trump or his campaign was somehow complicit in a nefarious scheme.
Democrats are already straining themselves trying to suggest that Flynn’s plea is just the beginning and that there is more to come. But as far as Flynn is concerned, that is unlikely. It is just wishful thinking on their part. It’s not as though he pleaded guilty only to leave unresolved matters for later.
Commentators are saying Flynn’s plea couldn’t come at a worse time for the president. As Republicans are on the brink of passing this administration’s most important legislative initiative with the GOP-led tax reform bill, some in the media have gone so far as to suggest Flynn’s admission of guilt may disrupt the tax bill’s vote count in Congress. Well, a note to the political geniuses in the liberal mainstream media: There isn’t one Republican member of Congress thinking, “Gee, Flynn pleaded guilty to something or another. Maybe I won’t vote for a tax cut.” It just doesn’t work that way.
Once the dust settles, the Democrats and their media allies will realize that there is nothing more to this story than what Flynn has admitted to. Commentators are saying Flynn has agreed to cooperate, as if that is something new. The fact is, there was never a time when Flynn wasn’t cooperating. He has been a cooperating witness since special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s investigation began.
The Democrats won’t admit it, but they are throwing in the towel on collusion. Their only choice now is to prop up the convoluted claim of obstruction of justice, and that could go on forever. The ordeal may be bothersome for the White House, but it won’t be fatal.
Oh and by the way, let’s reflect on what has happened in this investigation so far. Paul Manafort and Rick Gates were indicted on matters associated with foreign-agent registration and money laundering that predated any engagement they had with Trump. Flynn has pleaded guilty to a crime that occurred after the campaign was over.
To be precise, none of this involves the president or his campaign. It’s all ugly and ragged, but this White House has a lot of ugly and ragged.
Even if Flynn says he was instructed by the president to be in touch with the Russians, so what? All that would mean is the president-elect told his national security adviser to do his job. Don’t be fooled by the breathless, desperate reaction from the usual suspects. As far as the White House is concerned, the Flynn guilty plea is a 4 on a scale from 1 to 10.
Sorry, Democrats. The investigations and “collusion” outrage are running out of steam, well short of reaching the president’s doorstep.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2017/12/01/flynns-plea-doesnt-prove-collusion/?utm_term=.d0a33cb1e992
Geez, Sick Brit Twit already posted this crap, brain dead schmucks think alike, huh? First of all, this clown doesn't seem to realize that Mueller, who knows a WEE bit more about Flipping Felons 101 than THIS putz, did the exact same thing with Papadog: many charges possible, but only ONE charge and a sharply reduced sentence. You clowns act like he's gonna put all his goodies in the complaint, doesn't work that way. Flynn has to cooperate FULLY, and if he slips up just a bit, all the other charges can be brought in-and this complaint doesn't say that his son is off the hook, in case you hadn't noticed. If Flynn wasn't able to get Mueller something substantial AND verifiable, why in the world would he plead him down to just one charge, Genius? Then again, you're the schmuck who just a few days ago was mocking the possibility of Flynn flipping, whereupon he did exactly that, so, you're on a real roll, aren't you?:hahahahahLoser!@#0Shush()*Flynn’s plea doesn’t prove collusion (Sorry, Dems, 'Collusion' Outrage Is Running Out of Steam)
By Ed Rogers December 1 at 12:30 PM
Friday morning’s guilty plea from former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn is a major disappointment for Democrats.
Flynn admitting to having made false statements is nowhere near where the Democrats want this to go. Of course, the story is big and the fact that a former White House official has been charged with anything and pleaded guilty is consequential, but it doesn’t suggest any collusion occurred and it doesn’t even get close to confirming that Donald Trump or his campaign was somehow complicit in a nefarious scheme.
Democrats are already straining themselves trying to suggest that Flynn’s plea is just the beginning and that there is more to come. But as far as Flynn is concerned, that is unlikely. It is just wishful thinking on their part. It’s not as though he pleaded guilty only to leave unresolved matters for later.
Commentators are saying Flynn’s plea couldn’t come at a worse time for the president. As Republicans are on the brink of passing this administration’s most important legislative initiative with the GOP-led tax reform bill, some in the media have gone so far as to suggest Flynn’s admission of guilt may disrupt the tax bill’s vote count in Congress. Well, a note to the political geniuses in the liberal mainstream media: There isn’t one Republican member of Congress thinking, “Gee, Flynn pleaded guilty to something or another. Maybe I won’t vote for a tax cut.” It just doesn’t work that way.
Once the dust settles, the Democrats and their media allies will realize that there is nothing more to this story than what Flynn has admitted to. Commentators are saying Flynn has agreed to cooperate, as if that is something new. The fact is, there was never a time when Flynn wasn’t cooperating. He has been a cooperating witness since special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s investigation began.
The Democrats won’t admit it, but they are throwing in the towel on collusion. Their only choice now is to prop up the convoluted claim of obstruction of justice, and that could go on forever. The ordeal may be bothersome for the White House, but it won’t be fatal.
Oh and by the way, let’s reflect on what has happened in this investigation so far. Paul Manafort and Rick Gates were indicted on matters associated with foreign-agent registration and money laundering that predated any engagement they had with Trump. Flynn has pleaded guilty to a crime that occurred after the campaign was over.
To be precise, none of this involves the president or his campaign. It’s all ugly and ragged, but this White House has a lot of ugly and ragged.
Even if Flynn says he was instructed by the president to be in touch with the Russians, so what? All that would mean is the president-elect told his national security adviser to do his job. Don’t be fooled by the breathless, desperate reaction from the usual suspects. As far as the White House is concerned, the Flynn guilty plea is a 4 on a scale from 1 to 10.
Sorry, Democrats. The investigations and “collusion” outrage are running out of steam, well short of reaching the president’s doorstep.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2017/12/01/flynns-plea-doesnt-prove-collusion/?utm_term=.d0a33cb1e992
Hi everyone, hope you all had happy holidays. Listen to this libtard talking shit about our president...
Steve Bannon on the Trump Tower Russia meeting: “Even if you thought that this was not treasonous, or unpatriotic, or bad shit, and I happen to think it’s all of that, you should have called the FBI immediately.”
https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news...n-michael-wolff#click=https://t.co/clYYaK7UDT
Steve Bannon on the Trump Tower Russia meeting: “Even if you thought that this was not treasonous, or unpatriotic, or bad shit, and I happen to think it’s all of that, you should have called the FBI immediately.”
https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news...n-michael-wolff#click=https://t.co/clYYaK7UDT
Look in the mirror when you utter those words, Numbnuts: YOU'RE the one who is too stupid to understand that "making up" quotes like this in a book that will be widely released would result in a sure fire lawsuit, particularly from somebody as confrontational as Bannon. And YOU'RE the schmuck who believed that racist pedophile Moore prosecuted KKK murderers more than half a century ago, ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is wrong my friend, there are certain demographics that vote Democratic no matter what, and those IMPOVERISHED CRIME STICKEN HIGH SCHOOL DROP OUT NEIGHBORHOODS will always be blue
Nothing to see here...
Reuters Politics
@ReutersPolitics
BREAKING: FBI raid on Monday included both office and residence of Trump lawyer Michael Cohen - law enforcement source
For this to happen a federal judge must have seen probable cause of at least one crime in order to approve. Hope this idiot has a good lawyer.
Reuters Politics
@ReutersPolitics
BREAKING: FBI raid on Monday included both office and residence of Trump lawyer Michael Cohen - law enforcement source
For this to happen a federal judge must have seen probable cause of at least one crime in order to approve. Hope this idiot has a good lawyer.
Nothing to see here...
Reuters Politics
@ReutersPolitics
BREAKING: FBI raid on Monday included both office and residence of Trump lawyer Michael Cohen - law enforcement source
For this to happen a federal judge must have seen probable cause of at least one crime in order to approve. Hope this idiot has a good lawyer.
What does this have to do with Russian collusion???
Was Stormy a secret Russian agent???
Desperate times for the dirty cop calls for desperate measures.
Loser!@#0
